Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

1 roll of Ilford Delta Pro 100 with Flektogon 4/20 MC black
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 11:24 pm    Post subject: 1 roll of Ilford Delta Pro 100 with Flektogon 4/20 MC black Reply with quote

Digital pixel-peepers, look away Very Happy

It's now cleaned, re-lubed and adjusted - my Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 20mm f/4. This is the first roll I ran through the Bessaflex just to test everything was allright, and sure it was- it was serviced by a very reliable Zeiss enthusiast. Perfect landscape lens for my Bessaflex, and now in perfect working condition with modern grease.

I am very satisfied with the results and particularly the almost complete absence of barrel distortion so typical of this focal length. If I am too harsh and compare this lens to modern lenses of the same focal length I find myself less satisfied with the corners, as stopping down to f8-f/11 doesn't make them good (satisfactory at the most). This is no way to be interpreted as discredit the Flek, it costs a fraction of what the Nikkor 14-24/2.8G or 17-35/2.8D do and it's a much older design.

All in all, I find this prime enjoyable on the Bessaflex, and well worth its price. Colors are a little on the cooler side, very suitable for what I intend to use it for: b&w and Velvia landscapes on my Bessaflex.

On digital: I only tested the Nikon side (D3). With a mechanical adapter (no infinity) it shows, unsurprisingly, barrel distortion at close focus. I don't mind, as I really do not consider close-focus performance a reason to buy wide-angles. The near minimum focusing limit barrel distortion is all gone at medium to long distance. I agree this lens is suitable even for architecture as long as you don't confuse perspective distortion (useful) and lens distortion (bad).

With a glass adapter results were quite unsatisfactory, in fact this is the only lens that I have found suffers too much from the use of a glass (infinity) adapter on Nikon. I suspect the light hitting the sensor at steep angle combined with a magnifying glass in between makes for poor to medium corners no matter how good the lens is.

Pics?

Sorry, forgot Very Happy

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mureena/sets/72157617311097582/


PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm happy that my lens has found a new loving owner, Vilhelm. Very Happy
That copy which you own now, has given me some great images, that still make me very happy:

http://www.oriofoto.net/temp/piacenza_natale_2006/slides/01-400D_pc-flek4-20_061223_01.html
http://www.oriofoto.net/temp/piacenza_natale_2006/slides/03-400D_pc-flek4-20_061223_03.html
http://www.oriofoto.net/temp/piacenza_natale_2006/slides/05-400D_pc-flek4-20_061223_05.html
http://www.oriofoto.net/temp/piacenza_natale_2006/slides/26-400D_pc-flek4-20_061224_01.html

and it's good to see that in a completely different environment, it keeps rendering great images Very Happy

I wonder how much and how long these old lenses have traveled and changed hands... oh if lenses could only speak! Smile


PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, Orio, it's intriguing - what stories we cannot listen to Very Happy

Thanks for a great lens! That roll of Delta 100 was taken on April 11th, since then Spring has decided to arrive and now it is +17C on my window. Time to load a roll of Velvia Cool