| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dani9batan
Joined: 19 Jan 2012
Posts: 218
Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 4:08 pm Post subject: Planar 1.4/85 and Softbox 60x60 |
 |
|
dani9batan wrote:
Planar T* 1.4/85 is a great option to studio photography. This picture is only a test with my new softbox.
Regards.
Dani
_________________
Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Contax 167MT
Contax Distagon T* 2,8/28
Contax Planar T* 1,7/50 (x2)
Contax Planar T* 1,4/85
Contax Sonnar T* 2,8/135
Last edited by dani9batan on Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smoli4
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
Posts: 606
Location: Haifa, Israel
Expire: 2013-06-07
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Smoli4 wrote:
I love softboxes  
diffused light makes me silly 
i think in your image try to use less intensity and more of polorized filter type of look? i dunno just saying.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Looks works very well, congrats!
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dani9batan
Joined: 19 Jan 2012
Posts: 218
Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dani9batan wrote:
| Smoli4 wrote: |
I love softboxes
diffused light makes me silly
i think in your image try to use less intensity and more of polorized filter type of look? i dunno just saying.. |
Yes, the light is very high but... a polarized filter on portrait? 
_________________
Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Contax 167MT
Contax Distagon T* 2,8/28
Contax Planar T* 1,7/50 (x2)
Contax Planar T* 1,4/85
Contax Sonnar T* 2,8/135
Last edited by dani9batan on Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:16 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 1855
Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Great portrait  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Smoli4
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
Posts: 606
Location: Haifa, Israel
Expire: 2013-06-07
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Smoli4 wrote:
quote="dani9batan"]
| Smoli4 wrote: |
Yes, the light is very high but... a polarized filter on portrait? |
Nooo i meant if you try and use less intensity it will look as if you are using a polo filter with unique skin tones and detail! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dani9batan
Joined: 19 Jan 2012
Posts: 218
Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dani9batan wrote:
Ok, ok! hahaha I've understood it now 
_________________
Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Contax 167MT
Contax Distagon T* 2,8/28
Contax Planar T* 1,7/50 (x2)
Contax Planar T* 1,4/85
Contax Sonnar T* 2,8/135
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10471
Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
the softbox seems very small and give harsh light, I think bouncing on the wall will look better
_________________
T* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dani9batan
Joined: 19 Jan 2012
Posts: 218
Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dani9batan wrote:
| poilu wrote: |
| the softbox seems very small and give harsh light, I think bouncing on the wall will look better |
From to the softbox or without the softbox?
Thanks poilu
_________________
Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Contax 167MT
Contax Distagon T* 2,8/28
Contax Planar T* 1,7/50 (x2)
Contax Planar T* 1,4/85
Contax Sonnar T* 2,8/135
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jesito
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 5745
Location: Olivella, Catalonia, (Spain)
Expire: 2015-01-07
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jesito wrote:
Too much light, Dani.
You should either reduce the flash power or move it away from the subject.
Otherwise the portrait is very good, interesting expression catched, sharp and well composed.
Regards.
Jes.
_________________
Jesito, Moderator 
Jesito's backsack:
Zooms Sigma 70-300, Tamron 35-135 and 70-210 short, 70-210 long, 28-70 CF Macro, 35-70, 35-80, Vivitar 70-210 KA, Tamron 70-250.
Fixed Industar-50, , Tamron 24mm, Tamron 135mm, Sands Hunter 135mm, Pancolar 50mm, Volna-3, many Exakta lenses
DSLR SIGMA SD9 & SD14, EOS 5D, Sony A700 and NEXF3, Oly E-330, E-400, E-450, E-1
TLR/6x6/645 YashicaMat, Petri 6x45, Nettar, Franka Solida, Brilliant
SLR Minolta X300, Fuji STX II, Praktica VLC3, Pentax P30t, EXA500, EXA 1A, Spotmatic(2), Chinon CM-4S, Ricoh, Contax, Konica TC-X , Minolta 5000, 7000i, 3Sxi, EOS 500 and CX
Rangefinders Chinon 35EE, Konica C35 auto, Canonet 28, Yashica Lynx, FED-2, Yashica electro 35, Argus C3 & C4, Regula Cita III, Voigtlander Vitoret (many), Welta Welti-I, Kodak Signette 35, Zorki-4, Bessa-R & L, Minolta Weathermatic, olympus XA2
Compact Film Konica C35V, Voigtlander Vitorets, Canon Prima Super 105, Olympus XA2 and XA3
Compact Digital Olympus C-5050, Aiptek Slim 3000, Canon Powershot A540, Nikon 5200, SIGMA DP1s, Polaroid X530, IXUS55, Kodak 6490, Powershot G9 and G10
CSCCanon EOS-M, Samsung NX100 and NX210, Lumix G5, NEX-F3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10471
Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
| dani9batan wrote: |
From to the softbox or without the softbox?
|
without, but I don't know a lot about flash
I made the comment because for me flash is too visible in your pic
in 2007, I tried to get some results
but since I got my planars, I never touch flash again
_________________
T* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dani9batan
Joined: 19 Jan 2012
Posts: 218
Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dani9batan wrote:
OK thanks everyone!
_________________
Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Contax 167MT
Contax Distagon T* 2,8/28
Contax Planar T* 1,7/50 (x2)
Contax Planar T* 1,4/85
Contax Sonnar T* 2,8/135
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dani9batan
Joined: 19 Jan 2012
Posts: 218
Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dani9batan wrote:
Second attempt; Planar T* 1,4/85 and softbox 60x60.
It is a self-portrait
_________________
Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Contax 167MT
Contax Distagon T* 2,8/28
Contax Planar T* 1,7/50 (x2)
Contax Planar T* 1,4/85
Contax Sonnar T* 2,8/135
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 3215
Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
There is no glass on those spectacles.
_________________
Moderator Himself |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
