View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
piticu
Joined: 04 Aug 2008 Posts: 591 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:50 pm Post subject: Asahi Super Takumar 55mm 1.8 |
|
|
piticu wrote:
After a CLA (fungus on inner front lens; managed to move the infinity to almost 6m, from 4, on a nikon body) i've taken this lens to a test. Too bad that was cloudy and sun almost set, but the first impression i got is positive.
_________________ www.atelierelealbe.eu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10469 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
great shots peticu!
the portrait is so cute! _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zewrak
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1212
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
Yes, sir. Lovely lens. And lovely shots. _________________ My homepage, all manual shots |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blunderstein
Joined: 12 Jul 2008 Posts: 74 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blunderstein wrote:
That lens is quite obviously no good, you might as well give it away... to me.
Seriously, great shots. The rose is one of the finest b/w shots that I've ever seen.
/Erik |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3209 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
I like the portrait too. Well done.
poilu wrote: |
great shots pe(i)ticu!
|
You changed a letter mon pote and it's already another meaning. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
piticu
Joined: 04 Aug 2008 Posts: 591 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
piticu wrote:
Himself wrote: |
You changed a letter mon pote and it's already another meaning. |
that's ok the new word "peticu" means "the patch" _________________ www.atelierelealbe.eu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Looks like a keeper. I too love the portrait
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
piticu
Joined: 04 Aug 2008 Posts: 591 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
piticu wrote:
Blunderstein wrote: |
The rose is one of the finest b/w shots that I've ever seen.
Erik |
Thanks Erik. I like it too. In fact, as soon as i receive my new load of Piezography inks that picture will be one of the first printed _________________ www.atelierelealbe.eu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
The rose in black and white is splendid. _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
piticu
Joined: 04 Aug 2008 Posts: 591 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
piticu wrote:
That rose as recorded by camera. All CameraRaw sliders set to 0. The bw version has no selective editing nor dodging/burning
_________________ www.atelierelealbe.eu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterm1
Joined: 06 Dec 2007 Posts: 224
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterm1 wrote:
It has the reputation of being one of Pentaxes sharper lenses and lives up to it pretty well. _________________ PeterM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jesito
Joined: 24 Aug 2007 Posts: 5745 Location: Olivella, Catalonia, (Spain)
Expire: 2015-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jesito wrote:
You did a very good work with the lens!.
And also with the pictures
Congrats!
Jes. _________________ Jesito, Moderator
Jesito's backsack:
Zooms Sigma 70-300, Tamron 35-135 and 70-210 short, 70-210 long, 28-70 CF Macro, 35-70, 35-80, Vivitar 70-210 KA, Tamron 70-250.
Fixed Industar-50, , Tamron 24mm, Tamron 135mm, Sands Hunter 135mm, Pancolar 50mm, Volna-3, many Exakta lenses
DSLR SIGMA SD9 & SD14, EOS 5D, Sony A700 and NEXF3, Oly E-330, E-400, E-450, E-1
TLR/6x6/645 YashicaMat, Petri 6x45, Nettar, Franka Solida, Brilliant
SLR Minolta X300, Fuji STX II, Praktica VLC3, Pentax P30t, EXA500, EXA 1A, Spotmatic(2), Chinon CM-4S, Ricoh, Contax, Konica TC-X , Minolta 5000, 7000i, 3Sxi, EOS 500 and CX
Rangefinders Chinon 35EE, Konica C35 auto, Canonet 28, Yashica Lynx, FED-2, Yashica electro 35, Argus C3 & C4, Regula Cita III, Voigtlander Vitoret (many), Welta Welti-I, Kodak Signette 35, Zorki-4, Bessa-R & L, Minolta Weathermatic, olympus XA2
Compact Film Konica C35V, Voigtlander Vitorets, Canon Prima Super 105, Olympus XA2 and XA3
Compact Digital Olympus C-5050, Aiptek Slim 3000, Canon Powershot A540, Nikon 5200, SIGMA DP1s, Polaroid X530, IXUS55, Kodak 6490, Powershot G9 and G10
CSCCanon EOS-M, Samsung NX100 and NX210, Lumix G5, NEX-F3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I would not have the courage to take a lens apart for fear of turning it into a paperweight.
Good work! _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
piticu
Joined: 04 Aug 2008 Posts: 591 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
piticu wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
I would not have the courage to take a lens apart for fear of turning it into a paperweight.
Good work! |
Start with an unusable lens. That's what i did: i got from a friend a 50mm 1.9 fujika that nobody wanted. You'll see that it's an easy job — just have patience. _________________ www.atelierelealbe.eu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lazzaros
Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Posts: 975
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lazzaros wrote:
I've got one and I love it. Very sharp and i like the bokeh too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
I got my Super-Takumar 1.8/55 (dated 1964) on Friday and shot my first two rolls of film with it, using a Bessaflex TM. This time of year daylight equals barely handheld at ISO 400 and it's only available for 2-3 hours so subjects were limited. I would also have loved to use Delta 400 but my fridge only had Ilford HP5 400 and photo stores were closed all weekend for Independence Day celebrations.
@ f/2 handheld
@ f/1.8 handheld
Velvia 50 isn't the obvious choice for color film when you must do long exposures but it was the only color film in 135 size I had available. Bare with some of the shots that exhibit an overly green hue.
@ f/2 16s
@ f/4 6s
@ f/5.6 3s
I find the bokeh at medium distances nice, but close to the near focusing limit or when shot wide open it gets very wild
@ f/1.8 handheld
Don't know how "radio-active yellow" my lens is, I will find out when I shoot a color chart using digital.
I've uploaded these and more to Flickr in original size, you can access them here as thumbnails
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mureena/sets/72157610844846303/
or view them as a full-screen slideshow here
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mureena/sets/72157610844846303/show/ _________________ Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57839 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Great series! I especially like park picture taken by night! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Hienot Helsinkikuvat. The 55 is such an excellent lens. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
Thank you!
Yes, I agree this lens is outrageously good price/quality ratio. €20-30 for this build quality and performance is a steal Look forward to a more thorough trial run on digital, will post photos once weather is permitting again. _________________ Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2106 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
People in here often praise this Takumar 55/1.8, so I clicked BIN today.
it was just $29.95 plus shipping $11.80?
Just start waiting for a Super Takumar 55/1.8 to get to my home,
it is not S-M-C Takumar 55/1.8.
Any difference? One is more radio-active than the other? _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
The 55/1.8 isn't radioactive - the 50/1.4 is.
I have somewhere around here a couple of photos with an AUTO-Takumar and a SMC-Takumar 55/1.8 side by side, showing the effects of multi coating.
In practice, most of the time, there's not enough difference to really bother about. Sometimes I want more bloom to light, sometimes I want less... _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
Is 55/1.8 sharper at f/1.8, than 50/1.4? Some time ago I saw a test and 55/1.8 should be harper, but... _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spystyle
Joined: 28 Sep 2008 Posts: 107 Location: Lewiston, Maine, USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spystyle wrote:
The portrait is adorable |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Excellent pictures. Winter in the far north! Brrrr
I recommended this lens to Laurence a few days ago, you made me feel glad I did!
I'm interested in the film. I haven't made my mind up about Delta 400 or HP5+. The roll of Delta I did last year was great. The HP5 was too grainy, but I'm not sure I got the development right. Why do you prefer the Delta?
And about the green shot of the park, is there a reason for the green that you know about? I had some green shots like that recently using cheap neg film, but only with one particular lens. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
Thank you.
Winter here has not started yet. We don't have any snow in Helsinki and it's still +1C... In January it will get much colder. Lucky for me I have a 1-month assignment in Asia for January
Last summer I did a comparison between Ilford HP5 and Ilford Delta 400 films. I found the HP5 more contrasty (as in less shadow detail) and the Delta 400 to have finer grain. Delta 400 photos also look smoother when printed large (20x30 or bigger). Second test I developed at photostore developing machine, same results. Delta 400 also takes longer time to develop than HP5.
The green hue in the park photo is because of Velvia 50 characteristics. From the Velvia 50 technical data there is note that it is not calibrated for exposure times longer than 3-4 seconds. Any exposure longer than 3-4 seconds will gradually introduce a green hue (or sometimes red, depending on which color of light). This green hue can be disturbing in very long exposures. Sometimes it can look nice, like in the 16s exposure in the park photo: I think it works for the park photo which had green grass and blue/green street light.
If you want to do long exposures with Velvia I recommend you use the Velvia 100 (old or new recipe doesn't matter). Velvia 100 can take long exposure times much better than Velvia 50, without color hue.
EDIT: High Wycombe, whoa! My sister lives in your neighbour. Very nice area, I've been there many times. _________________ Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|