View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
PaulC
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 2318
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:25 pm Post subject: Making progress |
|
|
PaulC wrote:
Here's my latest shot with the Micro-Nikkor 55/3.5 from the 60s or 70s. What a delight this lens is! I briefly switched to some $1,000+ AF lenses but the quality just doesn't compare.
And I think I've maybe finally cracked the problem that has plagued me for years over lighting for food...
_________________ View or buy my photos at:
http://shutterstock.com/g/paulcowan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Nice! I wish to eat! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Good shot!
Funny, here's what I just wrote in another thread!
http://forum.mflenses.com/my-problem-with-food-photos-is-t24397.html#213450 _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulC
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 2318
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PaulC wrote:
Ha ha! Yes, it does get eaten. Eventually. But I really should be shooting it much faster than we can eat it.
My problem with food photography has always been the lighting. And my problem with my belly has been the photography!
At least the family gets a varied diet of fresh-cooked food. _________________ View or buy my photos at:
http://shutterstock.com/g/paulcowan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
So Paul, what lighting did you use? A lot of folks build light boxes for even lighting of smaller subjects. I haven't tried it yet, but the results I've seen sure are pleasing.
Very appetizing looking photo by the way. It's lunch time here and my stomach is growling.
I too am a big fan of the early Micro Nikkors. I have one that was built during the 60s, and it is just a fantastic lens for close-up work. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulC
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 2318
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PaulC wrote:
Light table, one flash underneath, one to one side with a reflector on the other side. _________________ View or buy my photos at:
http://shutterstock.com/g/paulcowan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heartcat
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Posts: 371
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
heartcat wrote:
What a delicious looking quiche and salad!
Oh, and great photo too... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Great shot with a legendary lens. That micro lens from nikkor has hardly been beaten even by today's monstrously expensive offerings. I see Nikon has added IS/VR to its latest micro offering ?
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dakoo
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 603
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
dakoo wrote:
Nice to see a thread on food photography..
I am myself trying a few shot of late to make my own photography blog, inspired from Alessandro.
But not too good results at all.
Would be great to get some advice from member on setup lights etc..
Lenses used Flek 35/2.4 (curry ofcourse ) on first, Takumara 50/1.4 on other. The second one is meant to show a country side bread called Bhakri
_________________ Yashica ML 2.4/24, ML 2.4./28,
Zeiss Distagon 35/1.4, Planer 1.4/50, Planer 1.7/50,
SMC Tak 1.4/50,Tessar 2.8/50, Jupiter2/85
CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200
Canon Tns 24/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
My wife is a chef and I like to cook, so we've collected MANY cookbooks over the years. Other than food photographers doing indecent things to food to get the shots they think look best, my next biggest complaint is a lack of depth of field. When you're taking a picture of your food, my advice is that the entire plate should be in focus.
I suppose some food photographers would argue that selective focus is a good thing. Yeah, maybe so, but I don't like it with food photography. I want to see everything on that plate in sharp focus. Just my two pfennig.
I haven't taken a lot of food photos, but here's one of them (barbecue brisket, Texas style):
_________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulC
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 2318
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
PaulC wrote:
Dakoo - it's not easy at all, is it? The natural assumption about food photography is that you just slap the plate down and hit the button and you're done. In reality, I think it is one of the hardest kinds of photography to get right.
You get all sorts of different results depending on the direction you light it from, and the number of lights you use. I think the most important thing is how you handle the shadows (and reflections - the reflection really kills the soup shot). You need shadows to give texture to the food but you don't want them to cast big black smudges.
Soft tight from above kills shadows, both nasty ones and nice ones. A lot of people use that to get pictures that look flat. Hard light from the side gives hard shadows, but they can be softened with a second flash or a reflector. Soft light from the side gives softer-edged shadows, but you still need to lighten them in some way.
When focusing you need to remember that two thirds of the DoF falls behind the focus point, so focus more towards the front of the subject. However much you stop down, viewed at 100% your DoF is going to be minimal so you need to choose the right point.
The use of colours is critical, brown food is very hard to get looking appetising. And, of course, you also need to pay attention to the composition on the plate and to any props you may be using. That's food "styling".
Even when you know how to handle all these things, an awful lot depends on how critically you can assess what you see in your photos. At every stage in your development it is easy to be impressed with how much better today's shots are than those you made six months ago and to think you are doing really well, so you need to compare your own work against the very best glossy magazine food shots you can find (the Australian Women's Weekly cookery magazines usually - but not always - have exceptional photography).
Above all, keep trying things out and see how they turn out.
Cooltouch - I don't think you can be dogmatic about focus. I deliberately reduced the DoF on the one I posted in order to avoid the salad distracting too much from the quiche. In other shots I went for the maximum DoF because there was nothing to distract from the subject - as in this one:
As you can see, even at this size and shot around f16 or f22 the DoF doesn't carry right to the back, in fact at full size it only extends something like an inch. Sometimes the old-timers would have used a large format camera with tilt to get the whole subject in focus. As most people don't have T/S lenses for 35mm that generally isn't an option. _________________ View or buy my photos at:
http://shutterstock.com/g/paulcowan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Thanks for that brief course on food photography
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I keep wanting to take a bite out of the screen. Good shots! I must try some of the lighting techniques and invest in/make a light table. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dakoo
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 603
|
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dakoo wrote:
Thanks a lot PaulC,
Since i am just starting with Food photography, this is very helpful indeed.
Already check the Australian Women weekly food photographs.
Shall keep posting my work here for critiques from you. _________________ Yashica ML 2.4/24, ML 2.4./28,
Zeiss Distagon 35/1.4, Planer 1.4/50, Planer 1.7/50,
SMC Tak 1.4/50,Tessar 2.8/50, Jupiter2/85
CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200
Canon Tns 24/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|