View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ltolias
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:22 am Post subject: M42 Lenses on Nikon DSLRs, Restoring Infinity Focus |
|
|
ltolias wrote:
I am looking to clarify the issue of infinity focus when using M42 mount lenses on nikon DSLRs.
From what I have gathered, the problem stems from a difference of about 1mm in the flange to focal plane distances for the Nikon F mount and the M42 mount.
This problem is sometimes alleviated by using a mount adapter with corrective optics. I do not particularly like this approach.
I have also found mention scattered around a few sites on the web that it is possible on many M42 mount lenses (particularly russian lenses like the Jupiter 9 and the Helios 40), to simply unscrew the rear optical element of the lens a few turns. In these lenses the rear element is in a thread of its own that can easily be unscrewed by a spanner. Unscrewing it moves the rear optical group backwards, reducing the flange to focal plane distance. This seems to be useable as a method for accounting for the 1mm discrepancy.
I was wondering therefore, if anyone could confirm that this method of unscrewing the rear element works reliably.
In addition, after looking through many many pages of M42 lens images, it seems that all of them have a moveable rear element. Does this mean that almost all of them can be easily adapted to work perfectly on Nikon DSLRs? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I think some M42 lenses may have enough adjustment on them to use on a Nikon, but probably 99%+ will not. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
Remember that it's not just the 1mm register difference of the mounts you need to make up for, but also the thickness of the adapter you are using. I doubt you will be able to reach infinity on most lenses, but do let us know if you succeed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10543 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Sounds to me like it could work, but by adjusting rear group by the thickness of the adapter plus 1mm, wouldn't then the helical have to turn more to move front group (adjustment + 1mm) closer to the rear group, to achieve infinity focus? I think a helical adjustment will also be necessary. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gurdie
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 997 Location: Finland
Expire: 2013-02-20
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gurdie wrote:
Some M42 lenses can be modified to reach infinity with Nikon bodies.
Helios-44 takes some machning.
http://forum.manualfocus.org/viewtopic.php?id=12363
Here´s a link, how to remove the stop screw from a Carl Zeiss Jena 135/3.5
http://forum.manualfocus.org/viewtopic.php?id=15919
There must be many others modifiable, I believe. _________________ Markku
Give me two hours a day of activity, and I'll take the other twenty-two in dreams.
― Salvador Dali
----------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:46 pm Post subject: Re: M42 Lenses on Nikon DSLRs, Restoring Infinity Focus |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
ltolias wrote: |
This problem is sometimes alleviated by using a mount adapter with corrective optics. I do not particularly like this approach.
|
have you actually tried? Works fine for me. close 1,5 to 2 stops down amd you'd never know. Of you're after shallow DOF its not going to make any difference anyway. I found only one lens that will work if you move the rear element. I think by moving an element you are entering the same territory as using corrective optics. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nick_cool
Joined: 04 Mar 2013 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
nick_cool wrote:
Yes, you can move back the inner lens, and also remove the stop screw from the inside the lens.
I adapted some M42 with great success:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nick_cool2000/6960323923/in/set-72157627250905996/
But I am still fighting with others...
Anyway I am happy with the results. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zylkan
Joined: 08 Apr 2015 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zylkan wrote:
Hi guys,
I realize these are all older threads but I just replied to this one here:
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1445500.html#1445500
I have a S-M-C Takumar 200mm F4 that I'm trying to adapt to my Nikon body but moving just the helicoidal was not enough for me.
The rear element approach seems good to me btw. I did notice by looking at the back of my lens that there's a couple of threads in an inner "tube" to fit a spanner wrench. Maybe I could try unscrewing this a bit?
Cheers |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Just remember, than when you adjust distance between lens front and rear part (most of them are double gauss type), you're worsening image quality, since lens inner distances were calculated in a way to cancel distortions and abberations as much as possible. When you distrupt this, you'll get more CA, coma, and sometimes geometrical distortions. _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zylkan
Joined: 08 Apr 2015 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zylkan wrote:
Ooops...
I see your point. That just blew everything out of the water!
Damn... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|