View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
WolverineX
 Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1695 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 8:41 pm Post subject: testing my lenses - part 71 - Olympus 35mm/2 |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
 _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WolverineX
 Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1695 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
new samples with E-M5
 _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Minolfan
 Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3424 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Nice samples with very good colours. Quite a lens! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WolverineX
 Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1695 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
yes, it is. 35mm/2 is one of my favorites.
most of these samples were taken in the ZOO pavillions that were dark and through glass, but with this lens (and camera) it was like i was shooting in daylight. with E-520 i couldn't get shots in there without motion blur _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vlousada
 Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 346 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
yes, it is. 35mm/2 is one of my favorites.
most of these samples were taken in the ZOO pavillions that were dark and through glass, but with this lens (and camera) it was like i was shooting in daylight. with E-520 i couldn't get shots in there without motion blur |
Yes, well done. Both camera and lens did perform very well (sure the photographer did it too)  _________________ Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ilguercio
 Joined: 08 Mar 2012 Posts: 415 Location: Southern Italy-Calabria!
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ilguercio wrote:
What serial number is it?
MC version?
I can buy one but since i've read different opinions about this lens (mostly negative) i'd love to have yours too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ManualFocus-G
 Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6674 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Very nice shots indeed, I love number 4 of the new series...he looks very relaxed if a little grumpy  _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WolverineX
 Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1695 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
ilguercio wrote: |
What serial number is it?
MC version?
I can buy one but since i've read different opinions about this lens (mostly negative) i'd love to have yours too. |
serial number is 146857
yes it is MC version
as i said i like it a lot. i don't have anything negative to say about it _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ilguercio
 Joined: 08 Mar 2012 Posts: 415 Location: Southern Italy-Calabria!
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ilguercio wrote:
Thanks, the fact is i only run into negative comments on the net and most of the people say it's not a stellar lens compared to other Zuikos.
Do you have any full size image at f/2? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WolverineX
 Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1695 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
ilguercio wrote: |
Thanks, the fact is i only run into negative comments on the net and most of the people say it's not a stellar lens compared to other Zuikos.
Do you have any full size image at f/2? |
well most of these new samples were taken wide open
here is an address for original size of the lizzard shot
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7235/7269462704_4da8f3bdc9_o.jpg _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html
Last edited by WolverineX on Fri May 25, 2012 10:39 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ilguercio
 Joined: 08 Mar 2012 Posts: 415 Location: Southern Italy-Calabria!
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ilguercio wrote:
Uhm, i'd love to see how it performs from f/2 onwards in front of a test scene, to be honest.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gmonkman1
Joined: 08 Jun 2011 Posts: 45 Location: se of Winnipeg Manitoba
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gmonkman1 wrote:
nice photos Wolverine. looks like a good lens.
It is a good thing that most of us do not rely on personal
opinions regarding quality of lenses....otherwise each of us
would not own so many...we like to find out by ourselves.
Old lenses with not good reputation on film will often shine with
some of the new digital sensors.
"if you are not using what you already have ,
you won`t use what you think you need."
Ken Duncan |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ilguercio
 Joined: 08 Mar 2012 Posts: 415 Location: Southern Italy-Calabria!
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ilguercio wrote:
What you say is sort of true but remember that we share our experience so everybody knows what could be a nice purchase and what to avoid.
I'm here asking about this lens because he has the very same version i'd love to buy but, after i had found very little infos about it and most of them rated it poorly, i wanted to know what his experience was.
I am looking at the pictures but i would like to see full res pictures, crops at different apertures, maybe a comparison with another 35 of the same league.
I know that could be bothersome but think of it as a favor that will be returned in the future somehow, when you're looking for infos about something and somebody has his thoughts already layed down at your disposal.
We know this is a tricky field and that we must gather as much informations as possible so nothing gets lost and people can enjoy a nice purchase if they're tight on budget.
Of course, there's nothing bad in buying a lens you never heard of and start looking at it from scratch but that's another story.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gmonkman1
Joined: 08 Jun 2011 Posts: 45 Location: se of Winnipeg Manitoba
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gmonkman1 wrote:
Well said ilguercio....I have been taught much from the people at this site
and at this time I want to thank all the people here , moderators and whoever
started this site to expand this great hobby...Thank You. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TijmenDal
 Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TijmenDal wrote:
Nice! This lens is one of the highest on my list of lenses to test! I've got the Samyang 35mm f/1.4 now, which is absolutely amazing, but this one also doesn't seem to be too bad  _________________ //Tijmen
http://cargocollective.com/tijmendal |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skida
 Joined: 02 Mar 2012 Posts: 1902 Location: North East England
|
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skida wrote:
Great shots WolverineX. All the shots, and especially the full size lizard, tell me all I need to know about the quality of this lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57939 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Excellent samples from a lovely lens. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hoanpham
 Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2577
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
Nice samples.
Same here, my is mc and I love my too. I can't recall any negative about this lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rafa1981
 Joined: 15 Jul 2010 Posts: 142
|
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
rafa1981 wrote:
Having tested some of the big-brand 35 f2 in the market: ais 35 f2, fd 35 f2, fd-n 35 f2, ST 35 f2, SMC-K 35 f2 and the MC Zuiko 35 f2 (had 3 copies), I would say that the zuiko is one of, if not the weakest of all, at least when used in FF.
It's not that bad as they say, but the corners and vignetting at first apertures are a bit lacking. I suppose that in crop formats is not that bad.
On the other hand, it has a very good form factor. _________________ My flickr.
Gear: Constantly evolving. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ilguercio
 Joined: 08 Mar 2012 Posts: 415 Location: Southern Italy-Calabria!
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2012 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ilguercio wrote:
Any 100% crop at f/2 and/ot full res picture? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|