| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
egidio
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 222
Location: slovenia
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:55 pm Post subject: testing bokeh of some 35mm lens |
 |
|
egidio wrote:
1. Flektogon 35mm : 2.8
2. Mir24H 35mm f2 (at 2.8.)
3. Mir1b 37mm f2.8
I made a tilt shift adapter out of mir1b lens because of incredible bokeh:
_________________
I use: Flektogon 2.8/20, Flektogon 2.8/35, planar 50mm/1.4, Takumar 1.4/50mm, Takumar 1.9/85, MIR 24H, Mir1v, Industar-50-2, Helios-44-2, Pentacon 2.8/135, cyclop 85 1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CarbonR
Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 1969
Location: Clermont-Ferrand, France
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CarbonR wrote:
The last one is incredible  How did you do your tilt adapter ?
_________________
Cameras : Canon 5D, Pentax K100D, Pentax 6x7, Spotmatic
Lenses : 15mm to 1000mm (24x36)
My websites : [FR & ENG]Takumar - the eyes of the Spotmatic : info about all Takumar lenses // Kogaku - My photo site
I am selling : Takumar lenses and rare Pentax bodies, pm me if you're interested in something [MFLenses feed-back]
Information on Takumar lenses with samples :
Wide angle : Takumar 15/3.5 15mm, Takumar 17/4 17mm, Takumar 18/11 18mm, Takumar 20/4.5 20mm, Takumar 24/3.5 24mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V1 28mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V2 28mm, Takumar 35/2 V1 35mm, Takumar 35/2 V2 35mm, Takumar 35/2.3 35mm, Takumar 35/3.5 35mm, Takumar 35/4 35mm
Standard : Takumar 50/1.4 V1 50mm, Takumar 50/1.4 V2 50mm, Takumar 50/3.5 50mm, Takumar 50/4 50mm, Takumar 55/2 55/1.8 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V1 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V2 55mm, Takumar 58/2 58mm, Takumar 58/2.4 58mm
Short tele : Takumar 83/1.9 83mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85/1.9 85mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85mm, Takumar 100/2 100mm, Takumar 100/3.5 100mm, Takumar 100/4 100mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V1 105mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V2 105mm, Takumar 120/2.8 120mm
Telephoto : Takumar 135/2.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/2.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 150/4 V1 150mm, Takumar 150/4 V2 150mm
Long tele : Takumar 200/3.5 200mm, Takumar 200/4 200mm, Takumar 200/5.6 200mm, Takumar 300/4 V1 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V2 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V3 300mm, Takumar 300/6.3 300mm, Takumar 400/5.6 400mm, Takumar 500/4.5 500mm, Takumar 500/5 500mm, Takumar 1000/8 V1 1000mm, Takumar 1000/8 V2 1000mm
Zoom : Zoom-Takumar 45~125/4 , Zoom-Takumar 70~150/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 85~210/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 135~600/6.7
Achromatic : Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 85/4.5 , Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 300/5.6 300mm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
If all taken from the same spot, does this suggest Flek is also 37mm? Very interesting tilt effect. I too would like to see how you accomplished it.
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007
Posts: 2190
Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Great use of the mir 1B's oof swirl. It's much harder to get with the mir than the helios. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
egidio
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 222
Location: slovenia
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
egidio wrote:
| woodrim wrote: |
| If all taken from the same spot, does this suggest Flek is also 37mm? Very interesting tilt effect. I too would like to see how you accomplished it. |
camera wasn't directly on the same spot (zeiss was few cm closer), but as far as I can see, zeiss has a little smaller bokeh circles than other two at same distance
I'll post pictures of adapter later, I'm very busy right now.
_________________
I use: Flektogon 2.8/20, Flektogon 2.8/35, planar 50mm/1.4, Takumar 1.4/50mm, Takumar 1.9/85, MIR 24H, Mir1v, Industar-50-2, Helios-44-2, Pentacon 2.8/135, cyclop 85 1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 733
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
The MIR-24 N looks good! Good close focus too (0.24m right?).
H is the Cyrillic character for N, so the correct designation is MIR-24 N 2/35. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16628
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Wrong thread! There is one for "crazy bokeh lenses" 
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
egidio
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 222
Location: slovenia
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
egidio wrote:
You are right, its Мир-24Н so its N. I actually know this alphabet for a long time, but I wasn't aware.
Its a great walkaround lens, nice colors, close focus is really good, but zeiss Flektogon has the same close focus capabilities. Мир-1b has bad close focus, but since I use tilt shift adapter I can go to macro if I want
Adapter is similar to this one http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=27718&view=next , just the lens is stripped(I removed mount and focus ring system) so the real element can go deeper in a camera therefore achieve infiniti while shifting. Yes I did hit mirror several times:)
_________________
I use: Flektogon 2.8/20, Flektogon 2.8/35, planar 50mm/1.4, Takumar 1.4/50mm, Takumar 1.9/85, MIR 24H, Mir1v, Industar-50-2, Helios-44-2, Pentacon 2.8/135, cyclop 85 1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 2475
Location: South West UK
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
| egidio wrote: |
You are right, its Мир-24Н so its N.
|
I wouldn't worry about it. The manufacturer sometimes mixed the two alphabets ....
Click here to see on Ebay
_________________
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Berlin, DE
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
Out of these three, I'd pick Mir-24 any day 
_________________
List of lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djmike
Joined: 01 Apr 2009
Posts: 930
Location: Taiwan
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
You have bad copy of Flek? Or this surprises me....
_________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6950
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
That doesn't look the same a the images that come out of my Flek, but it is the later F2.4.
Out of the 3 samples I'd have to pick #3. Russian lenses never cease to amaze me.
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
symphonic
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 550
Location: SE Europe, Croatia
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
symphonic wrote:
| aoleg wrote: |
| Out of these three, I'd pick Mir-24 any day |
For me just the opposite... I like bokeh from #3 - Mir1b the most, followed very closely by the Flek. Colors are also much better with them.
Btw. nice composition.
_________________
Toni,
EOS 450D
CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 MC | Pancolar 50/1.8 MC
Contax Planar 50/1.4 AEJ | Contax Sonnar 135/2.8 AEJ
Yashica ML 28/2.8 | Zuiko 28/3.5
Vivitar Series1 105/2.5 OM
AF: Tokina 12-24 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 733
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
I agree that the colors on the Flek and Mir1B look better; Mir24 is very warm. I wonder how close you can get them with some PP/WB correction. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Posts: 2106
Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Oh, OP has a relatively rare thing (iron kettle).
Sorry for not the bokeh impression.... 
_________________
Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joosep
Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 305
Location: Estonia, Tallinn
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joosep wrote:
I own both Mir-1 and Mir-24.
The 24 is SOOOO much better. Its really hard to explain it.
The build quality is good, minimal focus is 0,3m, so you can really use that smoooooth bokeh.
The 1 is just compact, thats all. Dont like the aperture system, the focusing ring is to close to the camera, minimal focus distance is 0,7m.
Im gonna develop some photos from the 24 soon. Then I can say more about the picture quality.
Edit:
Picture with Mir-24M from my 30D and another one.
_________________
The future is analogue.
23 cameras, 25 lenses and counting.
Last edited by Joosep on Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:26 pm; edited 8 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
The MIR-24 for my taste.
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator 
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vulko
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vulko wrote:
| AhamB wrote: |
| I agree that the colors on the Flek and Mir1B look better; Mir24 is very warm. I wonder how close you can get them with some PP/WB correction. |
You can get them right, believe me as a Mir-24 fan
Bokeh is much smoother, doesn't drag that much attention as bokeh of flek and mir1. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alegen
Joined: 06 Aug 2010
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alegen wrote:
| Quote: |
The 1 is just compact, thats all. Dont like the aperture system, the focusing ring is to close to the camera, minimal focus distance is 0,7m.
|
There is a version of Mir-1 with minimal focus distance 0.24mm: Mir-1A.
It is pretty rare and maybe not so cheap, but amazing.
Few samples:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jeff Zen
Joined: 17 Jun 2009
Posts: 262
Location: Northwest USA
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jeff Zen wrote:
Very interesting post. Thank you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
