Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

TTH Cooke Anastigmat f/4.5 5 1/2"
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think my point was really concentrating on the lenses available to the general public rather than "cutting edge" government sponsored research like the satellites and the Hubble. If I take my mac computer of 1985 and compare it with the one on my desk - well you simply cant compare them. But if I take my relatively new 28/2.8 AFD lens and compare it with my 28/2.8 AIS - an age difference of probably 20 years - the older lens actually blows the newer one away. I am sure the newer lens is much much cheaper to produce and feels very flimsy by comparison, but the only thing I am interested in (the picture quality) has actually gone retrograde.
However, the very fresh review of nikon's new 24-70 seems to imply that finally someone has applied newer technologies to a real advantage.

All of this ignores the other side of the camera - the medium, which has of course advanced by impossible leaps and bounds.


PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ballu wrote:

Veijo, I want to be a "real" blasphemous, and asking for the market price of this lens....


Well, it's hard to tell whether there is a market price as there really isn't a market for lenses like this which can be used only by tinkerers as they have no shutter and no focusing mechanism. I was the only bidder for my copy, which looked bad and was correctly advertised as having some small scratches on the back element, I paid the starting price of 12 UKP, which I felt was quite reasonable. Later I noticed there had been a perfect looking copy on sale in Spain - it went for 12 Euros or so. A 5" f/3.5 was sold for 29 UKP. To use the lens, you need a bellows and one or two sets of extension rings depending on the bellows. So the price goes up, very soon to the neighbourhood of 100 Euros, which may or may not be reasonable. With a 90 years old lens, you never know the condition for sure before you test it. I wouldn't say my triplet is perfect - even without the scratches. The bokeh isn't any too good wide open though it may improve when I stop down to f/8, but I haven't tested yet and then the background must, of course, be rather far away in order to go soft.

Veijo


PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have now finished the adaptation as follows. After correctly positioning the lens at the end of the extension tube, I fixed it with kneadable two-component epoxy (Repair Express). Now the lens was rigidly mounted, but the result didn't look very aesthetic:



I had also added 20 mm more extension between the lens and the bellows so the focusing range now extends from slightly past infinity down to about 1:1.6, i.e. a 24 mm x 36 mm size subject area covers the whole frame of the 350D. While searching for a suitable tube to cover the mess, I noticed that the extension tube set from which I had already used the bayonet section was almost exactly what I was searching for. I glued it to the back of the lens mounting plate and fixed the other end to the extension tube with the same "Plastic Metal" epoxy I had used to attach the bayonet:



The result looked quite respectable, and now the only thing missing was a suitable lens hood and a method of mounting it in a practical way. First I made a reasonable hood from a plastic jar cutting off the bottom and covering the inside with black, flocked plastic foil. The mouth of the jar is smaller than the lens mounting plate but slightly larger then the aperture scale ring. Then I took a second similar jar having an inner diameter only slightly larger than the outer diameter of the extension tube set, removed the bottom and the mouth sections, and attached the remaining cylinder to the lens end of the hood. Now I have got a quite reasonable push-on hood, externally covered with gray ventilation tape for the time being:



Veijo


PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm just amazed every time at what you are able to do, Veijo!