View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8982 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Not bad....thanks for showing me what can be done.
If it remains open sky and no clouds I may have another go tonight...and play with the settings...and take the mozzie repellent
I have a few 2x converters in my box of goodies should I try one of those on the Tamron? _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Mo, many congratulations on these shots. I've tried several times to get decent moon pics and it's not easy at all. I think you totally eclipsed my efforts! _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10471 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
great lunar series Mo! _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Mo I'd say go ahead and give the teleconverters a try, but I think you'll find that there is no improvement in detail -- just a larger image. I've found this to be true with my Tamron 2x and 1.4x, my Vivitar 2xs and my Nikon TC14b. Unfortunately. On the plus side, I've found that with a good TC the image degradation caused by its use is usually negligible. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8982 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Well I used the vivitar 3x converter,first I had to find the moon Then wondered why I could not see any images when i took a photo...I had to change the speed to a very slow speed...and that caused some shake in most photos I am not sure if they are worth showing? You were right Michael the 3X brought the moon into full frame...very impressive but the camera shake was more evident through the viewfinder.I have to read the K200D manual and see if there are any settings to help in this area.
TamronSP500 + Vivitar 3 X Tele converter
Here are 2 images the first is about the best I could get with the shake and the 2nd was mucking around with the speed from fast down to slow...interesting effect the speed has on the image! I really kick myself for not getting an earlier image of the moon on the horizon with the native gum trees silhouetted against the moon...this at least can try again to capture.
#1
#2
_________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arninetyes
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 312 Location: SoCal
Expire: 2013-03-26
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arninetyes wrote:
Yeah....been looking forward to the lunar eclipse for months. But I live in Southern California, where it never rains, but.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
mo wrote: |
Well I used the vivitar 3x converter,first I had to find the moon Then wondered why I could not see any images when i took a photo...I had to change the speed to a very slow speed...and that caused some shake in most photos I am not sure if they are worth showing? You were right Michael the 3X brought the moon into full frame...very impressive but the camera shake was more evident through the viewfinder.I have to read the K200D manual and see if there are any settings to help in this area.
|
Moira, in my 27-some-odd years of photography, I've never owned nor used a 3x TC. Mostly because I've never heard much good about them, I suppose. And when using one when taking shots of the moon, things can get tricky. You've already mentioned the two main problems: losing shutter speed and camera shake. With a 3x, you're losing 3 stops of light. So the 1/125 second @ f/8 @ ISO 100 becomes 1/15 second with the 3x. I consider 1/15 second to be borderline when it comes to shooting the moon because of the speed of the Earth's rotation. And at 1500mm, the slightest bump with even a sturdy tripod is gonna show a wild amount of gyrations of the image. So at this speed and magnification, really I would recommend a remote release because I don't think a 10-second self-timer will be long enough before the image settles down all the way. If your camera has any provisions for mirror lock up or pre-release, you should also use that. The big challenge then becomes focusing and having to deal with all the shake while doing so.
Of course, if your camera handles higher ISO settings well, then by all means, bump up the ISO. My camera starts showing noticeable noise at ISO 200, which is why I try to work within that constraint. But if you don't have this problem, then there isn't any reason why you shouldn't increase your ISO to incease your shutter speed.
But I still think that, after all's been said and done, when you compare the images taken with the TC to those taken without one, the TC's images are not gonna contain any more information than the original 500mm image will, and will probably contain less. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8982 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Thanks for the Advice,I have been reading the camera manual...something I should have done before I started taking moon shots
Apparently the K200D has a 12 sec timer...not sure what difference 2 secs makes...but at least I have the option of using this feature and will see what the difference is next time around (now to wait on the clouds to part and another full moon).I did learn something else the manual mentioned about turning off the IS on the Pentax when doing these night shoots and when using a tripod... something I did not think about. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|