Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Tomioka, Zeiss, Mamiya and 55/1.4 design.
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

...

Last edited by Pancolart on Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:36 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I had some doubts that the Porst 55/1.2 PK could be using the same formula as the Tomioka 55/1.2, I opened mine:


This is the rear optics of the lens. On the right the outer rear element, on the left a block which is behind the diaphragm (diaphragm should be on top of it). This is a block of 3 elements, including two cemented ones (the black line is between those two elements).
Verdict: 4 rear elements, including two cemented ones. With the 3 front elements that is a total of 7 elements and not 6, which points to the fact that it could indeed be the same formula as the Tomioka 55/1.2.


PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some 1,2/50-55 lenses have 7 elements. But we have to see if the distance between elements, class and curvature of glass, location of the blades, etc, are the same too.

Difficult things. Rino.


PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you very much. I hope this will end the doubts of this discussion:

http://forum.mflenses.com/so-i-got-this-from-a-2nd-hand-site-porst-55-1-2-t22842,start,75.html


PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:25 am    Post subject: Auto Mamiya/Sekor 55mm F1.4 (Cosina) Reply with quote

I'm currently pretty intrigued with Cosina-made all-black touch-radioactive Mamiya/Sekor 55mm F1.4.
Just as I've guessed from Flickr shots, it is not that good when it comes to carrying bokeh quality into the distance, but relative close ups are ranging from ok to impressive.
Inside, it's a solid build too.














My question is: was there ever a multicoated 55/1.4 by Cosina? (under any branding)
I'm aware of multicoated Tomiokas, and Mamiya-made 55/1.4s are likely all multicoated, but I'm interested in this exact optical block.
I haven't found one so far, but it was produced in so many shells and under so many brands, I might be missing some.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe the Auto Revuenon 55mm f1.4.
While mine are not labelled MC, the coatings look multi coated to me.
Tom


PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This Porst seems the be Multi-coated and Cosina
http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/605-porst-color-reflex-mc-auto-55mm-f-1-4-16-v1

and here a Super Carenar: http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/1367-carenar-super-carenar-mc-55mm-f-1-4-16

Here is a post of a Tomioka made Multi coated Chinon and A single coated Cosina. https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/porst-and-cosina-55mm-f-1-4--m42--50205

The Cosina multi-coateds don't seem to have the distinctive green coating layer.

There is a lot of confusion on the Internet over what is Tomioka and what Cosina. The main difference in probably the aperture ring. Lenses with red diamond focus marks are probably always Tomioka. If it has a Lolipop it depends on the aperture ring. I think Cosina and Tomioka problaby coöperated. Their are Tomioka branded Cosinas. Probably Tomioka glass in a Cosina body.


Last edited by D1N0 on Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:12 am; edited 2 times in total


PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oldhand wrote:
Maybe the Auto Revuenon 55mm f1.4.
While mine are not labelled MC, the coatings look multi coated to me.
Tom

Is there a sure way to tell if is something is MC or not?

Among the many 55/1.4 Reuvenons that existed I think just these two were by Cosina:
http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/266-revuenon-auto-revuenon-55mm-f-1-4-22
http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/554-revuenon-auto-revuenon-55mm-f-1-4-16-v4a
Is yours one of these?

The Revuenon labelled as MC is definitely Tomioka.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

aidaho wrote:
Is there a sure way to tell if is something is MC or not?

Looks like on the internet people are counting reflection colors while shining flashlight into the lens.
Using this method, two supposedly SC lenses I have (Mamiya 55/1.4 and Helios 44-2), indeed have only two color reflections.
But my pre-MC Zuiko 100/2.8 has 3-colored reflections. So I'm not sure how accurate this is.

Could be that I'm in possession of a non-MC-labelled Zuiko from an early multicoated batch, or this coating detection method just doesn't work.
Having more SC lenses would have helped, but mine are overwhelmingly multicoated.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

D1N0 wrote:
This Porst seems the be Multi-coated and Cosina
http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/605-porst-color-reflex-mc-auto-55mm-f-1-4-16-v1

and here a Super Carenar: http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/1367-carenar-super-carenar-mc-55mm-f-1-4-16

Thank you!


PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

aidaho wrote:
Oldhand wrote:
Maybe the Auto Revuenon 55mm f1.4.
While mine are not labelled MC, the coatings look multi coated to me.
Tom

Is there a sure way to tell if is something is MC or not?

Among the many 55/1.4 Reuvenons that existed I think just these two were by Cosina:
http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/266-revuenon-auto-revuenon-55mm-f-1-4-22
http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/554-revuenon-auto-revuenon-55mm-f-1-4-16-v4a
Is yours one of these?

The Revuenon labelled as MC is definitely Tomioka.


OK, I have two.
Neither is marked MC, but the coatings look multicoated not single coated.
Both have the flat rear element of the Tomioka design
Tom


#1


PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oldhand wrote:


So it is a v4b by m42 database classification: http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/266-revuenon-auto-revuenon-55mm-f-1-4-22

I'd say the left shell was made by Cosina.
I see some tell-tale DNA of distance scale, markings, fonts and shape of the A/M switch, which implies my Mamiya/Sekor was made by the same company.
This does not guarantee the optics to be the same, but the shell for both was made by the same people.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

aidaho wrote:
Oldhand wrote:


So it is a v4b by m42 database classification: http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/266-revuenon-auto-revuenon-55mm-f-1-4-22

I'd say the left shell was made by Cosina.
I see some tell-tale DNA of distance scale, markings, fonts and shape of the A/M switch, which implies my Mamiya/Sekor was made by the same company.
This does not guarantee the optics to be the same, but the shell for both was made by the same people.


I think both Tomioka but different body design. The Cosinas have an aperture ring that protrudes over the focus scale with a cut out of about a third of the ring for viewing the focus marks. I Also have a Yashinon-DS 50mm 1.7 with an identical rubber grip to the left lens (Yashica owned Tomioka). The right lens seems to be a Revuenon or maybe Chinon. What is the branding on the left one?


PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

aidaho wrote:

I'd say the left shell was made by Cosina.

That lens literally screams "I'm Cosina!". It's like 268% Cosina. At least.
Very Happy


PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alex TG wrote:
aidaho wrote:

I'd say the left shell was made by Cosina.

That lens literally screams "I'm Cosina!". It's like 268% Cosina. At least.
Very Happy


I think so.

The DOF marks are in the Mamiya (cosina) way.
The right one has tomioka's marks.


PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2022 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've found a good SX 55mm 1.4 mamiya for good price , but already have sime other 1.4 , so I am wondering if this one would really be any different to Nikon, mamiya ef, FD SSC etc, not in sharpness but in character? The 135 SX is a very nice one and could pair it with the 55mm, of course is only an excuse ...


PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2022 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A note of 55mm f1.2 lenses. There are at least three that I know of. There is the famous M42 Tomioka, sold under the names (at least) Tominon, Yashinon, Cosinon. Then there is the Porst, also sold under several names. Then there is another Cosina lens, sold as Revuenon MC or Cosina MC, that was made in PK mount. The supposition was that this is also a Tomioka design. It can be identified by having a 58mm front filter ring, instead of the 55mm thread of the Porst. For me personally, this last one is the best of the lot. Here are some shots with that one
#1


#2


#3


#4


#5


#6


#7

#1


#2


#3


#4


PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2022 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, you're really applied a lot of processing to those images. That makes it impossible to tell much about the character of the lens you used.


PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2022 8:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Wow, you're really applied a lot of processing to those images. That makes it impossible to tell much about the character of the lens you used.


Not much processing. Slight sharpening and microcontrast boost. I'm definitely not a SOOC guy, not with modern lenses and not with vintage lenses.


PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2022 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Microcontrast has a lot of influence on bokeh as you can see in these images. I am not a fan of using it in images with a lot of OOF areas. When a lens is very sharp and contrasty by itself you can use it to smoothen busier bokeh a bit without loosing too much subject contrast. Enhanced definition in OOF areas just makes it grainy and busier.


PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2022 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Depends on one's taste, I'd say. My particular taste runs to really busy, nisen bokeh YMMV


PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2022 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kymarto wrote:
Not much processing. Slight sharpening and microcontrast boost..


Please don't take us for fools by blatant lying.

Those images have been very heavily processed, anyone can see that.

So heavily that it makes no difference what lens was used.


PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2022 11:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
kymarto wrote:
Not much processing. Slight sharpening and microcontrast boost..


Please don't take us for fools by blatant lying.

Those images have been very heavily processed, anyone can see that.

So heavily that it makes no difference what lens was used.


Nope. It makes an absolute difference which lens was used. Processing does nothing but enhance what is already there. It cannot create anything. I have a few f1.2 lenses, and they all respond differently to what processing I do. I'll give you an example, since I don't have the Cosina with me. Here is a shot SOOC and then with my typical processing, shot with the Aires Coral-S 4.5cm f1.5 lens. If you think you could get a similar result with the majority of lenses of this focal length, you are dead wrong.


#2


#1


PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2022 11:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Auto Revuenon 55mm f1.2

#1


#2


#3


PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2022 12:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kymarto wrote:
Nope. It makes an absolute difference which lens was used. Processing does nothing but enhance what is already there. It cannot create anything. I have a few f1.2 lenses, and they all respond differently to what processing I do. I'll give you an example, since I don't have the Cosina with me. Here is a shot SOOC and then with my typical processing, shot with the Aires Coral-S 4.5cm f1.5 lens. If you think you could get a similar result with the majority of lenses of this focal length, you are dead wrong.


So you lied about the original images you posted and are now compounding that lie by refusing to admit you lied.

You processed the hell out of those images and it was really obvious.

No way are you going to get away with lying like that here, we are far too experienced to not spot such obvious heavy processing.