| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RenseH
 Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 571 Location: Zetten - The Netherlands
Expire: 2013-01-14
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:13 pm Post subject: Todays hike with the Helios-44K-4 (8 photos) |
|
|
RenseH wrote:
Last week, I ordered a K-mount Helios-44K-4, since I love my M42 Helios-44M, and I sold my 44M-4 to a friend... It arrived yesterday from Latvia, and I mounted it on my camera today to join me during a hike through Northeastern Twente, NL. These shots are all made during this hike, and all with the above mentioned lens. All but the mushroom are made at f/2, the max aperture of this lens. The mushroom was made at about f/4.
I think I'll keep this copy.....
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
 _________________ Rense
My Blog - My Website - My PPG |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
symphonic
 Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 566 Location: SE Europe, Croatia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
symphonic wrote:
Very nice shots!  _________________ Toni,
EOS 450D
CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 MC | Pancolar 50/1.8 MC
Contax Planar 50/1.4 AEJ | Contax Sonnar 135/2.8 AEJ
Yashica ML 28/2.8 | Zuiko 28/3.5
Vivitar Series1 105/2.5 OM
AF: Tokina 12-24 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davidus
 Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 190 Location: Prague, CZE
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Davidus wrote:
Nice. You have really good copy. _________________ Sony A7, Pentax P30t
MF: Pentax-M 35/2, Pentax-M 50/1.4, Pentax-M 135/3.5
AF: Sony 28-70/3.5-5.6 OSS
Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57939 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| Davidus wrote: |
| Nice. You have really good copy. |
Don't think so, seek Rense pictures he can make any lens to Gold..  _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davidus
 Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 190 Location: Prague, CZE
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Davidus wrote:
I guess, Attila, you're right
BTW I have a 44-2 and its optical quality is more than good. Unfortunately have little mechanical problem and sometimes about a third of pic is not sharp as rest of it. It is fixable, but I'm not able to do it  _________________ Sony A7, Pentax P30t
MF: Pentax-M 35/2, Pentax-M 50/1.4, Pentax-M 135/3.5
AF: Sony 28-70/3.5-5.6 OSS
Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57939 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Dirt cheap lens and pretty common take an another one, this is most economical way in my opinion. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rbelyell
 Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4286 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
while it is true, all of renses photos are wonderful, i have to say the mushrooms really pop. i wonder if you think its because that one was stopped down to f4? _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
poilu
 Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10576 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
| symphonic wrote: |
Very nice shots!  |
+1, great rendering _________________ T* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57939 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Stopped down always help a lot in my opinion , I did start to test all lenses at F5.6 as common sense for speed and availability for most lenses. When I saw many great photos taken at F8 with common lenses like Helios 44 I did start to use F8 at least if possible. I guess my success ratio is highly increased. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29658 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
It is difficult and also not really correct to make a general statement, because every lens is a world apart, but, usually, f/8 is a point where most lenses except for modern big slow AF zooms have past their optimal peak "spot" performance, but usually have still good spot performance coupled with more uniform rendition over the whole frame.
In other words, the best point (sweet spot) of a typical lens whose widest aperture is between f/2 and f/2.8, is found at f/5.6 (and usually in the centre); while the most uniform rendition is found at f/8, where the centre is a bit weaker than f/5.6 but the edges are better than f/5.6
Like I said, this is a generalization, which is not really good, because each lens is a case apart.
Besides, many fast lenses have their sweet spot earlier, like at f/2.8 or f/4
Another thing to consider, this generalization works better for full frame cameras. For crop cameras, which usually pack more sensor cells in a smaller space, diffraction enters the scene earlier. For instance, while a 5D is safely shot also at f/11, a 50D (camera that I own) begins to show diffraction already at f/8.
For Micro 4/3 the situation might be even worse, I have no sure data but I would not be surprised if a micro 4/3 sensor would cause diffraction to appear already at f/5.6
So to recap, on a full frame camera, or on a film camera, an aperture of f/5.6 (or earlier if the lens is very fast) can be considered the best choice to show the maximum sharpness in the best area of the image. While an aperture of f/8 can be considered the best choice if you want to emphasize the whole frame performance (including corners) rather than the single sweet spot point performance.
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rbelyell
 Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4286 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
my totally non technical probably silly rule of thumb was/is sweet spot of any lens for non infinity focus is double its open aperture, eg a 2.0 lens is best at 4.0, a 2.8 open ap lens best at 5.6 etc. and then add 1 more stop to that to get the best of that same lens at infinity focus. so the 2.0 lens best at infinity at 5.6; the 2.8 at 8.0 etc
again that is just my silly rule that helps me, but it probably is totally unsupportable!
 _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davidus
 Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 190 Location: Prague, CZE
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Davidus wrote:
| Attila wrote: |
| Dirt cheap lens and pretty common take an another one, this is most economical way in my opinion. |
Yes. The question is, if I get one in (at least) same optical quality. _________________ Sony A7, Pentax P30t
MF: Pentax-M 35/2, Pentax-M 50/1.4, Pentax-M 135/3.5
AF: Sony 28-70/3.5-5.6 OSS
Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Excalibur
 Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5041 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
| rbelyell wrote: |
my totally non technical probably silly rule of thumb was/is sweet spot of any lens for non infinity focus is double its open aperture, eg a 2.0 lens is best at 4.0, a 2.8 open ap lens best at 5.6 etc. and then add 1 more stop to that to get the best of that same lens at infinity focus. so the 2.0 lens best at infinity at 5.6; the 2.8 at 8.0 etc
again that is just my silly rule that helps me, but it probably is totally unsupportable!
 |
Couldn't use your rules yesterday as the sun is getting weak in the UK at 12 o'clock, 100asa was F5.6 @ 1/60 sec and the lens was 65mm and WO is F4.5..... and I didn't have a tripod. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rbelyell
 Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4286 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
wow! that IS some weak sun! typically in mid day sun 100 asa at 5.6 yields shutter speed of 1000!
of course there are many reasons to shoot at apertures other than the lens 'sweet' spot; and many more reasons not to use my silly rule! _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nikos
 Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1170 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
| Orio wrote: |
Another thing to consider, this generalization works better for full frame cameras. For crop cameras, which usually pack more sensor cells in a smaller space, diffraction enters the scene earlier. For instance, while a 5D is safely shot also at f/11, a 50D (camera that I own) begins to show diffraction already at f/8.
For Micro 4/3 the situation might be even worse, I have no sure data but I would not be surprised if a micro 4/3 sensor would cause diffraction to appear already at f/5.6
|
Even worse, many compact digital cameras do not even have f/8.
Most have a smallest aperture of f/7.1 or so. _________________ Νίκος • www.diafragma.gr
Cameras: Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Sony α7R, Sony NEX-5N
MF lenses:
SLR:
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4, Zeiss 2.8/21 ZE, Zeiss 2/28 Contax, Zeiss 2/35 ZE, Zeiss 1.4/50 Contax, Zeiss 1.4/85 Contax, Zeiss Makro 2/100 ZE,
Zeiss 2/135 Contax, Zeiss 2.8/135 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 35-70 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 100-300 Contax, Zeiss F-Distagon Rollei, Canon FD 24mm f2, Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm f2.8
Rangefinder:
Zeiss 4.5/21 C Biogon ZM, Zeiss 2/35 Biogon ZM, Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar L39, Leica Tele-Elmarit 2.8/90mm, Zeiss 2/45 Contax G, Zeiss 2.8/90 Contax G, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM
AF lenses: Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, Canon 70-200 f/4 L, Canon 300 f/4 L IS, Canon 100 f/2.8 macro
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57939 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| Davidus wrote: |
| Attila wrote: |
| Dirt cheap lens and pretty common take an another one, this is most economical way in my opinion. |
Yes. The question is, if I get one in (at least) same optical quality. |
90% chance yes. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RenseH
 Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 571 Location: Zetten - The Netherlands
Expire: 2013-01-14
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RenseH wrote:
| Attila wrote: |
| Davidus wrote: |
| Attila wrote: |
| Dirt cheap lens and pretty common take an another one, this is most economical way in my opinion. |
Yes. The question is, if I get one in (at least) same optical quality. |
90% chance yes. |
Probably even more! Thanks for looking and commenting all of you! _________________ Rense
My Blog - My Website - My PPG |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davidus
 Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 190 Location: Prague, CZE
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Davidus wrote:
One question, Rense.
What do you think? Is 44-4 better then 44-2? _________________ Sony A7, Pentax P30t
MF: Pentax-M 35/2, Pentax-M 50/1.4, Pentax-M 135/3.5
AF: Sony 28-70/3.5-5.6 OSS
Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RenseH
 Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 571 Location: Zetten - The Netherlands
Expire: 2013-01-14
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RenseH wrote:
| Davidus wrote: |
One question, Rense.
What do you think? Is 44-4 better then 44-2? |
I really don't know, never had the 44-2. I have the 44M, and the 44K-4 now.... _________________ Rense
My Blog - My Website - My PPG |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davidus
 Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 190 Location: Prague, CZE
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Davidus wrote:
Never mind. I think, 44-2 will be good again. _________________ Sony A7, Pentax P30t
MF: Pentax-M 35/2, Pentax-M 50/1.4, Pentax-M 135/3.5
AF: Sony 28-70/3.5-5.6 OSS
Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|