View previous topic :: View next topic |
Which 135 lens is the most beautiful one? |
CZJ Triotar 135/4 |
|
3% |
[ 7 ] |
CZJ Sonnar 135/4 |
|
4% |
[ 9 ] |
CZJ Sonnar zebra 135/3.5 |
|
2% |
[ 5 ] |
CZJ Sonnar MC 135/3.5 |
|
15% |
[ 33 ] |
Jupiter-11 135/4 |
|
7% |
[ 16 ] |
Jupiter-37A/AM 135/3.5 |
|
4% |
[ 10 ] |
Tair-11A 135/2.8 |
|
10% |
[ 22 ] |
Super / S-M-C Takumar 135/3.5 |
|
7% |
[ 16 ] |
Super / S-M-C Takumar 135/2.5 |
|
13% |
[ 29 ] |
another one (specify) |
|
33% |
[ 73 ] |
|
Total Votes : 220 |
|
Author |
Message |
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Just as a short remark at the side: is is necessary to quote the whole post with all the pictures?
This makes it hard to read and follow this thread. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
voytek
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 891
|
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voytek wrote:
Done I apologize for any inconvenience. Usually I am editing quotation and remove unnecessary part of post. In this situation I thought that KhanX samples are so nice that it is nothing wrong to show them again instead posting crappy samples from my Angenieux But if it bother you so much... I will do my best to follow this rule as everybody does _________________ Cheers, Voytek |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Thanks. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blue
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Posts: 304
|
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blue wrote:
For some of the beautiful Steinheils in black with chrome stripes, got to Captain Jack's page and scroll down to them including the black with chrome striped 135mm.
http://captjack.exaktaphile.com/Steinheil%20page.htm _________________ Pentax: K, H2, H3, S3, SV (late & early), SV black, Spot F, K2 chrome, K2 black, ME F, SuperProgram, 6x7, Auto 110, Asahiflex IIB late
Pentax "modern": MZ-3, *istD, K200d, K20d
Mamiya: C3 TLR, NC1000
Canon: EOS 10s, AE-1
Chinon: CP-7m
IKON: Contax D, Praktiflex FX & Victar 50mm f2.9
Contessa-Nettel Piccolette - 7.5 cm Tessar & Compur shutter
Rangefinders: Argus C4 and Ricoh Five-One-Nine |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3693 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
http://captjack.exaktaphile.com/Isco%20page.htm
Non-plastic ISCO Westanar is a Rolls-Royce. _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterm1
Joined: 06 Dec 2007 Posts: 224
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterm1 wrote:
In terms of camera porn I always had a liking for the chrome Canon 135mm f3.5 for its rangefinder series of cameras - come to think of it, it is a pretty good lens, optically as well.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/takekazuomi/14162169/ _________________ PeterM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papah
Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 12 Location: Seattle, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papah wrote:
My 135 MF favorite is the Soligor 135 f/2:
My all-time favorite is the Nikon 135 DC f/2. The soft-focus possibilities of the DC adjustment is wonderful. _________________ Bruce Hemingway
http://www.brucehemingway.com/
http://thenewpictorialism.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009 Posts: 385 Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
Orio wrote: |
135mm, in general, are not the most beautiful lenses, in my opinion. They could actually be considered amongst the ugliest, because many of them look too long compared to their diameter. I think aesthetically speaking, the 90mm lenses are more beautiful.
If I had to choose one 135 for it's looks I would probably pick the Elmarit-R 135, second version, as it's larger diameter makes it more well proportioned. |
for me in sud-tirolo ... I haven't had the requirement to use a 80-90mm…. always I use 50 or 135 or 200mm... it depends !
in general I always try to separate my principal subject from the rest of the landscape....
I think that 80-90mm for me it is too much short ... because often the mountains are far away from me....
a small principal subject in the picture will be often faded....specially if the subject is a mountain.... _________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BenediktW
Joined: 24 Jan 2008 Posts: 336 Location: Solingen, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
BenediktW wrote:
I have to vote for 2 135mm lenses:
- Nikkor Q-Auto 135mm F3,5:
- Mamiya Sekor SX 135mm F2,8:
Greetings
Benedikt _________________ http://www.1979fotographie.de/
Nikon D90, Sony NEX-3
AF-Nikkors 24mm F2,8, 35mm F1,8 DX, 85mm F1,8, 28-105mm F3,5-4,5D IF
Nikon MF: Nikkor 20mm F4, Nikkor 50mm F2 Ai, Micro-Nikkor-P 55mm F3,5, Nikkor 135mm F2,8 Ai, Nikkor 200mm F4
Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135mm F2,8 [for sale], Vario-Sonnar 80-200mm F4 T* (C/Y) with Leitax for Nikon-F
Minolta MD-Rokkors: 28mm F2,8, 45mm F2
M42 Lenses: Mamiya/Sekor SX 21mm F4, SX 28mm F2,8, SX 55mm F1,8, SX 135mm F2,8, 400mm F6,3 [for sale], Asahi-Pentax Super-Tak. 28mm F3,5 and 55mm F1,8, CZJ Tessar 50mm F2,8, Vivitar 135mm F2,8
Mamiya 645 Lenses: Mamiya Sekor C 80mm F2,8 N, 300mm F5,6, 105-210mm F4,5 ULD [for sale] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009 Posts: 385 Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:25 pm Post subject: ... |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
sincerely I don't buy a lens basing to me only on the aesthetic one !
-.-
I hope that I will like my new C/Y Sonnar T* 2.8/135mm ...
I am awaiting it .... _________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
(Off-topic.)
BenediktW wrote: |
|
Hi, please link back to the flickr photo page when posting images from there. In this case it happens to be my picture, but even if it's not I think it's interesting to be able to reach the photographer through flickr, etc. (I think flickr also technically requires this in terms of use, but it's not very enforceable when people other than the photographer can paste the link without agreeing to the terms. =)
(In this case the link is http://www.flickr.com/photos/arkku/3878264589/.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BenediktW
Joined: 24 Jan 2008 Posts: 336 Location: Solingen, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BenediktW wrote:
Oh, sorry, didn´t even notice it was from flickr. I just linked it.
Congrats to this combination, anyway!
Regards
Benedikt _________________ http://www.1979fotographie.de/
Nikon D90, Sony NEX-3
AF-Nikkors 24mm F2,8, 35mm F1,8 DX, 85mm F1,8, 28-105mm F3,5-4,5D IF
Nikon MF: Nikkor 20mm F4, Nikkor 50mm F2 Ai, Micro-Nikkor-P 55mm F3,5, Nikkor 135mm F2,8 Ai, Nikkor 200mm F4
Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135mm F2,8 [for sale], Vario-Sonnar 80-200mm F4 T* (C/Y) with Leitax for Nikon-F
Minolta MD-Rokkors: 28mm F2,8, 45mm F2
M42 Lenses: Mamiya/Sekor SX 21mm F4, SX 28mm F2,8, SX 55mm F1,8, SX 135mm F2,8, 400mm F6,3 [for sale], Asahi-Pentax Super-Tak. 28mm F3,5 and 55mm F1,8, CZJ Tessar 50mm F2,8, Vivitar 135mm F2,8
Mamiya 645 Lenses: Mamiya Sekor C 80mm F2,8 N, 300mm F5,6, 105-210mm F4,5 ULD [for sale] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nemesis101
Joined: 25 Mar 2008 Posts: 2050 Location: Oregon USA
Expire: 2015-01-22
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:55 am Post subject: Re: The most beautiful 135mm lens |
|
|
nemesis101 wrote:
Excellent
Most of my lenses at all focus lengths are 'other' branded so I guess all mine a good? lol
Doug
no-X wrote: |
In connection with the discussion in my Sonnar thread, I decided to prepare a poll.
Please vote |
_________________ Lenses and cameras:
Amateurs worry about equipment
Pros worry about money,
Masters worry about light. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
I think the screwmount Leica 135/4.5 Hektor is a very handsome lens to look at, but it won't go on an SLR. On a micro-4/3, though, it might be pretty..... _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5028 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
Jupiter version wasn't specified. Everyone seems to like their own lenses. It is the same thing with one's dogs.
_________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
In general I'd say that aluminium finish looks better than the more modern styles. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 1922 Location: Slovenija
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NikonD wrote:
my (converted to Nikon mount) Pentacon 135/2.8 preset...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3693 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Considering after alu designs lens porn i'd choose this baby over Zeiss Sonnar (i agree with seller from Poland, but his photos does not show superb finish and coating of this lens in true way; lens also much smaller then Zeiss; najlepszy means the most beautiful):
http://www.allegro.pl/item874466732_aj_najlepszy_tele_ebc_fujinon_t_3_5_135_m42.html _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 11:29 pm Post subject: Fujinon EBC 135 f2.5 |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
I know the topic is a little old but this is one lens in that focal range I've liked. I love its light all metal body with very good perfomance. I love the feel of the Rubber grip focusing ring and the aperture ring. My vote goes to this one.
Sample Pics Below:
Last edited by Kathmandu on Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
The 135mm f/2.5 Fujinon is indeed an excellent one, and I, too, am very fond of its looks. There's something about the “Fuji green” used for part of the distance scale and the EBC text… Something similar to seeing that red T* on Zeiss lenses.
P. S. The indoor sample looks a bit blurry; camera shake? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
Arkku:Must be daylight in Helsinki eh?
I dont know if it is camera shake - it was shot handheld and I know the depth of field is very narrow/shallow, and the bokeh is wonderully thick creamy and smooth(it would go wonderfully on a toast)-youll have to see my pictures on the Fujinon EBC lens group in on Flickr ,the actual photo size to confirm -but there's alway is more chance of camera shake on these light longer lenses -and the group admin there looks/sounds awfully like you- LOL .
The ISO level may have been a little high? I do not have the exif data on these handy to confirm.
Ladenla
Last edited by Kathmandu on Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:01 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Another vote for the Nikkor 135mm f2.8 Q-Auto....one of my favorites for many years.
_________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
natebarnz
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 331 Location: Los Angeles / Tucson
Expire: 2013-01-23
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
natebarnz wrote:
I second this beauty!
Thom Yorke wrote: |
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the Minolta 135mm F2.
One of the finest 135mm's
|
_________________ 500D / SPII / FTn / Contax D / 137MA / Contaflex
Contax 28/2 - 35/1.4 - 35/2.8 - 45/2.8 - 50/1.4 - 100/3.5 - 135/2.8
CZJ 20/4 - 35/2.8 - 50/2.8 - 58/2 - 135/3.5
Rokkor PG 58/1.2 - PF 58/1.4 - X 85/1.7
Nikkor S 55/1.2 - H 85/1.8 - P.C. 55/3.5
Helios 44-2 58/2 Meyer Oreston 50/1.8
Elmarit-R 90/2.8 Sears 55/1.4
--> Visit My Picasa Galleries <-- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
Boomer Depp wrote: |
Another vote for the Nikkor 135mm f2.8 Q-Auto.... |
Heh, I have one of these as well, and while the images turn out very good, I think it's one of the ugliest 135mm's ever. It's way too fat, the built-in hood is hideous, plastic, and impractical, and the coloured text is disgusting (f/16 is pink). =) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Fat Girls need loving,too....
I wish more lenses had this good of a build and quality of workmanship.
The size of the lens in my big mitts,makes it a joy to use and the lens hood is sign of practicability.
BTW this lens and all the other 135 Q's that I've seen have a metal lens hood...so you might want to check a little closer.
To me the coloring of the inscription makes the lens unique and the skinny girls love it.... _________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it.
Last edited by Boomer Depp on Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:04 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|