| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014
Posts: 209
Location: London, England
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 2:35 am Post subject: |
 |
|
etorix wrote:
huge tho
kinda
i think thats prolly heavier than my dusty ol Nikkor 50mm 1.2
ima lower my sights a bit, to the Canon 'Japanese Summilux' 50mm 1.4
which i dont need, but i'd like to try tho |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Langstrum
Joined: 16 Feb 2014
Posts: 351
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Langstrum wrote:
@Lightshow: did you shoot wide open for that sample? it looks stunning.
I can get one here for merely 200 bucks, but I'm not sure if it's worth or not. I read mixed reviews on this lens, but seems like its f/1.2 is too soft. After seeing the photos here, I still can't decide.
_________________
Camera: Sony A7 mark III, A6300
AF Lenses:
Canon EF 50/1.8; EF 200/2.8 L, EF 200/1.8 L, EF 300/4 L Sony E mount SEL 50/1.8 OSS, SEL 16/2.8 Fuji X mount XF 35/1.4 R
MF Lenses: Peleng MC 8/3.5, 17/2.8 Samyang 14/T3.1, 35/T1.5, TS 24/3.5 ED, 85/T1.5, Polar 85/1.4 Auto Revuenon 28/2.8; MC 50/1.4 Vega11U 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Tessar 50/2.8 (exakta mount) Auto Chinon 50/1.9 Zenitar ME1 50/1.7 Sears Auto Sears 55/1.4; Sears 135/2.8 Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.4; Tomioka 50/1.2 SMC Pentax 50/1.7; 50/1.4 Canon FD 50/1.4 S.S.C; 55/1.2 S.S.C; FD 50/1.2 L; FD 85/1.2 L; 85/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical; FD 80-200/4 L 300/2.8 S.S.C Fluorite FD 300/2.8 L FD 200/1.8 LCosina-S 50/1.2 Helios Helios 44 Chrome f/22, 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 (58/2), Helios-40 85/1.5 Jupiter Jupiter-9 85/2; Jupiter-37A 135/3.5; Jupiter-21M 200/4 Nikon Ai 105/2.5 Tairs-3S 300/4.5
Voigtlander 15/4.5 Aspherical; Ultron 35/1.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
exaklaus
Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 1633
Location: Niederrhein, Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
exaklaus wrote:
200???
Get it, try it!
In case, you don't like it, resell it with a profit!
_________________
my Ebay auctions
Canon 5D II,
Fuji GW690III, Fuji G617, Fujifilm X-E1
Bessaflex TM
Tachihara 4"x5"
Summilux-R 1:1,4/50
Canon FD 85mm 1:1,2
Color-Heliar 75mm F2.5 SL
www.autoselbstfotografie.de
www.classic-cameras-and-lenses.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 4572
Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
| exaklaus wrote: |
200???
Get it, try it!
In case, you don't like it, resell it with a profit! |
+1
I'll buy it from you for 250 
_________________
my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014
Posts: 209
Location: London, England
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
heh, get it man
unless its been dropped, or is full of fungus .. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Langstrum
Joined: 16 Feb 2014
Posts: 351
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Langstrum wrote:
Thank you all for your suggestions, I will get there next month to test if it's good or not, it looks very good but somehow it has stayed there for years  But seems like because in Korea not many people care about this lens, I found others with around $300 and only few is $500 (with full box and accessories)
Just checked it again, it's actually $250. I'm not sure if it has haze on the rear element or not.
They also have the f/1.4 for $10 less, this one looks much better
_________________
Camera: Sony A7 mark III, A6300
AF Lenses:
Canon EF 50/1.8; EF 200/2.8 L, EF 200/1.8 L, EF 300/4 L Sony E mount SEL 50/1.8 OSS, SEL 16/2.8 Fuji X mount XF 35/1.4 R
MF Lenses: Peleng MC 8/3.5, 17/2.8 Samyang 14/T3.1, 35/T1.5, TS 24/3.5 ED, 85/T1.5, Polar 85/1.4 Auto Revuenon 28/2.8; MC 50/1.4 Vega11U 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Tessar 50/2.8 (exakta mount) Auto Chinon 50/1.9 Zenitar ME1 50/1.7 Sears Auto Sears 55/1.4; Sears 135/2.8 Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.4; Tomioka 50/1.2 SMC Pentax 50/1.7; 50/1.4 Canon FD 50/1.4 S.S.C; 55/1.2 S.S.C; FD 50/1.2 L; FD 85/1.2 L; 85/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical; FD 80-200/4 L 300/2.8 S.S.C Fluorite FD 300/2.8 L FD 200/1.8 LCosina-S 50/1.2 Helios Helios 44 Chrome f/22, 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 (58/2), Helios-40 85/1.5 Jupiter Jupiter-9 85/2; Jupiter-37A 135/3.5; Jupiter-21M 200/4 Nikon Ai 105/2.5 Tairs-3S 300/4.5
Voigtlander 15/4.5 Aspherical; Ultron 35/1.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014
Posts: 209
Location: London, England
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
o00o that 1.4 looks clean
| Quote: |
| Serial Number for the Type II range from 29681 – 120705 |
thats one of the 'good' ones then, allegedly |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16541
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Go for teh f1.4, it looks MUCH better to me.
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011
Posts: 3669
Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Hard to say if the 1.2 has fungus or haze.
@langstrum, it was WO or possibly one click down(Checked, it's at f1.4), mine doesn't have much if any glow wide open.
The 1.4 version is reputed to have very good quality, $240 is a fairly decent price.
The Nikkor 50/1.4 & 50/2 are nice too, I've been looking for one in great shape.
My Topcor-S 50/2 is currently my favorite RF 50.
_________________
A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/
Last edited by Lightshow on Wed Nov 19, 2014 9:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Langstrum
Joined: 16 Feb 2014
Posts: 351
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Langstrum wrote:
I have the same though to all of the above suggestions, maybe the f1.4 will be a better deal.
| Lightshow wrote: |
Hard to say if the 1.2 has fungus or haze.
@langstrum, it was WO or possibly one click down, mine doesn't have much if any glow wide open.
The 1.4 version is reputed to have very good quality, $240 is a fairly decent price.
The Nikkor 50/1.4 & 50/2 are nice too, I've been looking for one in great shape.
My Topcor-S 50/2 is currently my favorite RF 50. |
It's still be excellent at f/1.4 or f/1.8, I'm still looking for a lens like this.
I found some RF Nikkor 50/1.4 and Topcor 50/2 here as well, but they rate them much higher than Canon ($500 - 800), so I don't even dare thinking about buying them 
_________________
Camera: Sony A7 mark III, A6300
AF Lenses:
Canon EF 50/1.8; EF 200/2.8 L, EF 200/1.8 L, EF 300/4 L Sony E mount SEL 50/1.8 OSS, SEL 16/2.8 Fuji X mount XF 35/1.4 R
MF Lenses: Peleng MC 8/3.5, 17/2.8 Samyang 14/T3.1, 35/T1.5, TS 24/3.5 ED, 85/T1.5, Polar 85/1.4 Auto Revuenon 28/2.8; MC 50/1.4 Vega11U 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Tessar 50/2.8 (exakta mount) Auto Chinon 50/1.9 Zenitar ME1 50/1.7 Sears Auto Sears 55/1.4; Sears 135/2.8 Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.4; Tomioka 50/1.2 SMC Pentax 50/1.7; 50/1.4 Canon FD 50/1.4 S.S.C; 55/1.2 S.S.C; FD 50/1.2 L; FD 85/1.2 L; 85/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical; FD 80-200/4 L 300/2.8 S.S.C Fluorite FD 300/2.8 L FD 200/1.8 LCosina-S 50/1.2 Helios Helios 44 Chrome f/22, 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 (58/2), Helios-40 85/1.5 Jupiter Jupiter-9 85/2; Jupiter-37A 135/3.5; Jupiter-21M 200/4 Nikon Ai 105/2.5 Tairs-3S 300/4.5
Voigtlander 15/4.5 Aspherical; Ultron 35/1.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Posts: 1300
Location: Idaho, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
I noticed I have some samples from this lens on the A7r so I thought I would put them up 
Canon LTM 50/1.2 c by unoh7, on Flickr
Canon LTM 50/1.2 by unoh7, on Flickr
Canon LTM 50/1.2 b by unoh7, on Flickr
This copy is not perfect, and was about 425USD But I like it.
Calibration is not great with M9, but I need to practice and get some shots anyway
If I'm not mistaken, 50,000 copies of this lens were produced!
_________________
Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014
Posts: 209
Location: London, England
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
Currently in the UK, 2 on the same page
scroll down a bit http://www.mwclassic.com/acatalog/Online_Catalogue_Leica___Leica_Copy_L39_Lenses__ADDED__5.html
a whole two of them in various conditions |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
newst
Joined: 21 Oct 2014
Posts: 617
Location: Troy, MI USA
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
newst wrote:
| etorix wrote: |
huge tho
kinda
i think thats prolly heavier than my dusty ol Nikkor 50mm 1.2
ima lower my sights a bit, to the Canon 'Japanese Summilux' 50mm 1.4
which i dont need, but i'd like to try tho |
I recently made the same choice. Can't say I am disappointed.
However the money I saved didn't stay saved long. Instead it was invested (yea, like I said, invested
) in a Zeiss Ultron 1.8/50, which I still can't use because the adapter for my A7II is still coming from China.
_________________
Steve
Just an armadillo on the shoulder of the information superhighway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014
Posts: 209
Location: London, England
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
heh, miy money just went out on a Canon 35mm f1.8 LTM
i needs 35mm rather than 50mm
it prolly wont still be there but also just spotted a Canon 50mm f1.4 LTM with a teleconverter! heh! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
radissimo77
Joined: 20 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Glasgow
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
radissimo77 wrote:
I went for a walk once comparing my LTM Canon 50/1.2 with Canon nFD 50/1.2 L and ...well...L was TECHNICALLY better I you would guess. I am keeping both
In some situations the LTM is unbeatable, but overall FD L is a king.
[img]
 [/img]
_________________
Sony A7 ,A7s, 5T, Ricoh GR,Pana LX100, Canon G7x...& too many MF lenses to list |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011
Posts: 3669
Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
| etorix wrote: |
heh, miy money just went out on a Canon 35mm f1.8 LTM
i needs 35mm rather than 50mm
it prolly wont still be there but also just spotted a Canon 50mm f1.4 LTM with a teleconverter! heh! |
Canon also made a somewhat rare 35/1.5 LTM.
_________________
A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
newst
Joined: 21 Oct 2014
Posts: 617
Location: Troy, MI USA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
newst wrote:
The 35/1.8 is a nice lens. Very small and quite sharp.
But what really stunned me is the Canon 135/3.5 that I just got in the mail today. This is the first photo I took with it.
_________________
Steve
Just an armadillo on the shoulder of the information superhighway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
padam
Joined: 09 Oct 2012
Posts: 175
Location: Hungary
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padam wrote:
Agreed on the 135/3.5 LTM, superb lens, especially for the money. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Posts: 1300
Location: Idaho, USA
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
I had this lens out today on the A7.mod:
Garth by unoh7, ISO 100, at 1/640, what was my aperture? At least the M9 makes a guess 
DSC00915-2 by unoh7, on Flickr
Above you can see most of the frame is actually very good at f/8 but the edges really collapse, unlike the 1.4.
DSC00926-3 by unoh7, on Flickr
The 1.4 is cool WO, but does not do this LOL
_________________
Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
