View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Cobalt60
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: Central Europe
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 3:40 pm Post subject: The beauty has arrived ... AUTO YASHINON 55mm 1:1.2 TOMIOKA |
|
|
Cobalt60 wrote:
See below pictures of the lens, a cat at f1.2 and at 2.0.
My verdict: of all 1.2 lenses I have seen this one is at the very top (and clearly above the Yashinon DS-M 1.2 I have tested recently).
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Cobalt60,
Gorgeous lens, and gorgeous pics of your cat! There are at least 3 of us
now that I know are cat-fanciers, Orio, me, and now, you! Hopefully
you were not emitting any gamma radiation when you took these. Could
we have a real name to address you?
Thanks for sharing,
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Wow, this lens is both a beauty and quite a performer.
I always have been somewhat reluctant to look for a f1.2, 'cause I didn't see much difference to my f1.4 and I always thought that you can't really use those lenses wide open anyway. Well, it seems you can!
What did you pay for that cutie? _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Seems a great lens and cat is beautiful! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cobalt60
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: Central Europe
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cobalt60 wrote:
@Bill: you might call me MJ ... I am not sure if I was emitting radiation during the shoot but I am damn sure the lens was ...
@Lucis: Uh ... oh ... it was a "reasonable" amout
Last edited by Cobalt60 on Fri Jun 29, 2007 9:27 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Man, a f/1.2 image, and not even the slightest sign of vignetting?
That lens must REALLY be a gem!
I never used any f/1.2 lens, but all the f/1.4 lenses that I have (and I have some of the best ones), or have had, do vignette a bit wide open, including the likes of Leica, Zeiss, Nikkor, Takumar.
P.S. love your cat! Melissa likes him too, she would like to ask if he's free for a date
_ _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
One of the very best at f1.2 is the Noct Nikkor 58/1.2, quite expensive
lens, but there are pros that say it "owns" f1.2, as it is as sharp all the
way out to the corners, wide open, as it is stopped-down. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Anybody can realize significant difference between an 1.4 and 1.2 lens ? Any benefits from 1.2 ? I am not talking about feeling if I have an 1.2 I also a proud owner and love much. I am asking the practical side. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Anybody can realize significant difference between an 1.4 and 1.2 lens ? Any benefits from 1.2 ? I am not talking about feeling if I have an 1.2 I also a proud owner and love much. I am asking the practical side. |
Half stop difference.
Narrower DOF
These are the two practical differences. How much important, it depends on what you do with the lens.
If you are at a Rolling Stones concert with a photographers pass, or at a nighttime outdoor sport event, that half stop may help save your job, as it may make a difference between an acceptable image and a motion blurred one. But this extreme case aside, I can't see a major difference for the normal user.
As for the DOF, half a stop at such extreme aperture can mean a significant difference in the DOF. That will at the same time make it more difficult to focus, and give you more creative power with the bokeh effects.
Once again, if that is worth an extra expense, it totally depends on the single user.
To end my reasoning, I'd like to offer a different perspective. Sometimes it's not that half stop, but the quality of the lens itself. Take the 1.4/85 Planar. It is an excellent lens. Used value is about 400 Euros more or less.
Then take the 1.2/85 Planar, the anniversary lens. It costs about 3000 Euros used. That's more than 7 times the price. One may say "heck, for just half a stop, that ain't worth it". And that would be true, if the lenses were the same in performance. But if you look at the 1.2/85 MTF, you will see it blows the 1.4/85 away. And we're not talking of a bad lens: the 1.4/85 has an excellent performance MTF. But the 1..2/85 it's just, superior.
Of course the opposite case may happen, when the slower lens is better than the faster one.
This is to say that ultimately it's not the half stop that counts, but the overall performance of the lens that needs to be considered. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
MJ, looking forward to more of your pics with this lens!
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|