Home
SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Tele lenses with "oil painting" bokeh?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

^ @ZoneV, those are stunning!


PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How beautiful!! Some one is selling this lens on local craigslist asking for $50. I'm thinking to get it. (Actually asking $30.)

eno789 wrote:
Konica Hexanon AR 135mm f/3.2, on micro 4/3.
To me, the bokeh seems like brush strokes, while still remains calm.









Last edited by cellotone on Mon Dec 07, 2015 5:27 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are Konica AR 135/2.5, also 100/2.8 which is better? Rolling Eyes


PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cellotone wrote:
How beautiful!! Some one is selling this lens on local craigslist asking for $50. I'm thinking to get it.

eno789 wrote:
Konica Hexanon AR 135mm f/3.2, on micro 4/3.
To me, the bokeh seems like brush strokes, while still remains calm.

...

There are Konica AR 135/2.5, also 100/2.8 which is better?
...


Thanks. I feel Hexanon AR 135mm f/3.2 is the most bang for the buck. Lookup the minimum focus distance of each, 135/3.2 has 1m, which is quite close for a 135mm. The 100/2.8 is very nice too, but usually around $100, with a MFD of the same 1m. I don't have experience with 135/2.5, I recall it has 62mm filter thread, so probably a bit bigger.


PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

eno789 wrote:
cellotone wrote:
How beautiful!! Some one is selling this lens on local craigslist asking for $50. I'm thinking to get it.

eno789 wrote:
Konica Hexanon AR 135mm f/3.2, on micro 4/3.
To me, the bokeh seems like brush strokes, while still remains calm.

...

There are Konica AR 135/2.5, also 100/2.8 which is better?
...


Thanks. I feel Hexanon AR 135mm f/3.2 is the most bang for the buck. Lookup the minimum focus distance of each, 135/3.2 has 1m, which is quite close for a 135mm. The 100/2.8 is very nice too, but usually around $100, with a MFD of the same 1m. I don't have experience with 135/2.5, I recall it has 62mm filter thread, so probably a bit bigger.


Was going to say you might want faster than 3.2, but the 1m CF is fantastic. Smile


PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not sure this is oil painting, however:

Cyclop 85/1.5:




Makinon 500/8 mirror lens:



PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 1:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote




Konica 58mm f1.4 and Mamyia 55mm f1.8 have some potential.

N.


PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 7:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My first post here in this forum and i have to say: Wow! Great results with manual lenses. Thanks for these looking nice pics!

Here a FD 1.8/50


PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 7:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welcome
Here you go
OH

coastman wrote:
My first post here in this forum and i have to say: Wow! Great results with manual lenses. Thanks for these looking nice pics!

Here a FD 1.8/50


A much under-rated lens.
Well taken
OH


PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks!