View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:28 am Post subject: Tamron SP 300/5.6 - Still a Recommended Lens? |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
I have a chance to purchase from a member of my old camera club, a near-mint Tamron SP 300/5.6 for about $50. Comes with original caps and M42 Adaptall 2, which would help me to add to my M42 system that I'm trying to build.
Is this a decent price? It sure seems like it to me, especially since I get to "try before I buy".
I see from reviews here on MFlenses, that it is a well-liked lens. Is this still generally the consensus about this lens?
Any opinions would be greatly appreciated. _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Unfortunately I am not able to give you a specific answer, because I don't know the lens and know little the brand too (I only have two Tamron lenses), because I have chosen to focus on German and Russian lenses, as they fit my style better.
What I can tell you is that many people swear by the SP series of Tamron to be top of excellence for sharpness. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Unfortunately I am not able to give you a specific answer, because I don't know the lens and know little the brand too (I only have two Tamron lenses), because I have chosen to focus on German and Russian lenses, as they fit my style better.
What I can tell you is that many people swear by the SP series of Tamron to be top of excellence for sharpness. |
Thank you, Orio. My specific uses for the 300 will be for various imaging of elk, owls, eagles which are plentiful in my favorite rain forest river valley close to home. I also will use it to isolate various subjects such as florals, etc.
I am aware that 300mm is a bit short for eagles and owls in certain situations, and I will eventually be trying to find a good Russian 500mm or above. I used to have the Arsat 500mm mirror lens (Rubinar), and it was decent enough; I might end up with one again one of these days.
Nearly all shots will be on a tripod or over a beanbag on my automobile window. The elk are usually willing to "pose" fairly close in the Winter months in their natural habitat. This obviates the need for "only" about 300mm for filling the frame with the elk.
Some will be with the old Pentax 1.4TC in M42 mount, some without TC.
I can certainly see the propensity toward the fabulous German and Russian lenses as well. In fact, I certainly own a number of them. _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Laurence wrote: |
Thank you, Orio. My specific uses for the 300 will be for various imaging of elk, owls, eagles which are plentiful in my favorite rain forest river valley close to home. I also will use it to isolate various subjects such as florals, etc. |
Then I think it can be a perfect choice for you. Many natural wildlife photographers use the Tamron SP zooms and teles because of their ability to render sharply even distant objects.
Russian and German lenses can be sharp, too, but their image rendition is more oriented to some "organic" quality of the image (roundness, bokeh, saturation), rather than to extreme sharpness.
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TDN
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 321 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
TDN wrote:
50 $ is a great price for that lens!!
If you don't like it, you can resell it easily with even some profit.
Tom _________________ ---
TDN - tdn9.be
---
SLR: Nikon EM , Pentax K2 DMD, K1000, MZ-5
DSLR: Pentax K10D
Lenses (Nikon): E-series 1.8 50mm & 100mm f2.8; Tokina RMC 80-200mm f4
Lenses (Pentax): Pentax 17mm f4.0 Fish-eye; Pentax-A 50mm f1.7; Kiron 105mm f2.8 macro; Pentax-FA 50mm f1.4; Pentax-A 35-135mm f3.5-4.5; Sigma 28-70mm f2.8 EX Aspherical; DA 18-55mm f3.-5.6; Tamron 28-200mm f3.8-5.6 XR;
Lenses (M42): Jupiter-9 85mm f2; Pentacon 200mm f4;
Lenses (Adaptall): Tamron SP 60-300mm f3.8-5.6; Tamron SP 80-200mm f2.8 LD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
Thanks folks. I looked on previous sales of these lenses on the auction site.
Interestingly, the only one found recently on any "finished listing" did NOT receive even a starting bid of $50. But, this looked like an earlier non-SP version to me. I don't know if the optics were the same as the SP version.
There is one on the block that has been bid to $48 so far, with six bidders.
However, again it is not an SP version.
One more non-SP was sold for $2 (!!!).
Also of interest is that is seems that photographers don't really look for this lens.
So, it's a bit of confusion for me, but I think I am in agreement with the fact that the SP version would probably sell for at least $50 if I didn't like it. The other factor is that I'm hearing that it is still highly recommended.
1. Nothing to lose, a potentially fine optic
2. $50 is not enough to quibble about
3. My current Tamron SP 70-210 is really quite a fine lens with superb, and I mean SUPERB mechanics.
Based on the above, I'll buy it.
I'll let you all know what I think. _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Super Tak
Joined: 31 Jul 2007 Posts: 103
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Super Tak wrote:
I have nothing on the PC right now so you will just have to take my word for it, but in my opinion it is a really good lens.
I have the SP version and my copy is superb, it has great image quality, is nice to hold and easy to focus, I'll never need another 300mm lens.
Price wise on eBay, when it has appeared it has easily fetched ?50-70+ GBP but it really doesn't show up much at all these days. _________________ Panasonic G1 | Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 ASPH | Jupiter-8 50mm f/2 | Nikkor 200mm f/4 AI
If you believe everything you read, then you had better stop reading. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
Super Tak wrote: |
I have nothing on the PC right now so you will just have to take my word for it, but in my opinion it is a really good lens.
I have the SP version and my copy is superb, it has great image quality, is nice to hold and easy to focus, I'll never need another 300mm lens.
Price wise on eBay, when it has appeared it has easily fetched ?50-70+ GBP but it really doesn't show up much at all these days. |
Thank you Very much SuperTak. Another opinion that this must be a pretty good lens, and worth me taking a look at. _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
440roadrunner
Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Posts: 52
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
440roadrunner wrote:
I would, if at all possible, hold out for the SP version. I have an earlier version, Adaptall, evidently the CT300
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.tamron.co.jp/data/old-lens/ct300.htm
This is NOT a tremendous lens, with reservations:
I paid almost nothing, (traded a Konica camera for it) and it IS BETTER than much of the old, long, T mount junk you see popping up on eFray. I bought a Nikkor 300mm (use on my Canon) and it's a much better lens, but, admittedly, I paid lots more for it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Tamron SP 300mm f5.6 good as than any of my other 300mm lenses
like Olympus OM 300mm f4.5,Nikkon 300mm f4.5 or Carl Zeiss Jena 300mm f4
I believe one of the best perhaps the best 300mm lens what is available on the market under 300 GBP.
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/japenese/Tamron/tamron_sp_300/ _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard_D
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2378 Location: Faversham Kent UK
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Richard_D wrote:
440roadrunner wrote: |
I would, if at all possible, hold out for the SP version. I have an earlier version, Adaptall, evidently the CT300
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.tamron.co.jp/data/old-lens/ct300.htm
This is NOT a tremendous lens, with reservations:
I paid almost nothing, (traded a Konica camera for it) and it IS BETTER than much of the old, long, T mount junk you see popping up on eFray. I bought a Nikkor 300mm (use on my Canon) and it's a much better lens, but, admittedly, I paid lots more for it. |
Yes I had the old CT300 version a few years back - not bad, but not great - I found it too dark too focus easily, and a tad soft, but far from terrible.
The SP 300 is a far better lens:
http://www.adaptall-2.com/lenses/54B.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
GREAT information from all of you! Yes, I only want the SP version, as I read the great review here on MFlenses. _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Laurence wrote: |
GREAT information from all of you! Yes, I only want the SP version, as I read the great review here on MFlenses. |
Laurence, Rob Leslie has posted some fantastic wildlife pictures on this forum using this lens in the past. You should find them if you search for his posts or for the lens name. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|