View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:09 pm Post subject: Summar f=5cm 1:2 1937 coated |
|
|
etorix wrote:
No 407947 dates it to 1937
it shows some thin cleaning scratches on the front element
otherwise it seems good, no haze fungus or separations
fucussing is smooth but quite stiff
the aperture ring is very stiff tho, too stiff in fact
i'm not quite sure how to proceed yet
i would be grateful for pointers to a good Summar rebuild guide, or any sensible tips pls |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MartinCrabtree
Joined: 10 Jan 2015 Posts: 121
|
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MartinCrabtree wrote:
How about a couple gratuitous photos?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
How remiss of me, of course
i shall post som tomoorow
it looks quite handsome in its OG metal cap |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
no pics OF, but a few BY
hmm why cant i see a guide-to-posting pics on here, am i missing it
so, what, jpg un-processed max 1000 oixel a side? [ish]
ladder, gloomy
v gray early morning, this is shot wide open in colour
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 11:48 pm Post subject: Re: Summar f=5cm 1:2 1937 coated |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
etorix wrote: |
No 407947 dates it to 1937
it shows some thin cleaning scratches on the front element
otherwise it seems good, no haze fungus or separations
fucussing is smooth but quite stiff
the aperture ring is very stiff tho, too stiff in fact
i'm not quite sure how to proceed yet
i would be grateful for pointers to a good Summar rebuild guide, or any sensible tips pls |
First of all, try CRS at Luton for making it better, but I think they may take a while to do it. I think their website shows a Summar being dismantled. It probably won't be a cheap job but could be money well spent if you're interested in how pre-war lenses perform.
A nice clean Summar will come as a revelation to those who've read how 'inferior' to a contemporary Sonnar it's supposed to be. Some were coated by Leitz in the 1950s, I think, but most of the coated ones found in UK will have been done by independent firms. I once had one that had been re-polished, coated and adjusted by the Jason Adams Co. and I was pretty much taken aback at how good it was. Another one I should have kept ! _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Any good lens of historical value deserves to be serviced by someone that knows what they are doing.
The RFForum should have the info as to who to trust with it.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/index.php _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
site seems down for repair, but this seems to be the relevant page http://www.angelfire.com/biz/Leica/summar.html
and here is a rather 'bling' cutaway view of a Summar
excellent innit
image taken from here http://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/988068 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|