| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Athiril

Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 67 Location: Brunswick Heads, NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 6:22 am Post subject: Suggest a pano head for me (looking at nodal ninja) |
|
|
http://nodalninja.com.au/products/
This is what im looking at, is the nodal ninja 3 Mk II good? fiddly? hard to set up? easy to use?
Or should I go with the nodal ninja 5L?
I plan on getting a Sigma 12-24mm and using it on my Canon 30D and on my EOS 500N film camera, as well as my Zuiko 50mm f/1.4 prime and a 28mm prime (manual lens).
What are you experiences?
I like to shoot stuff like this (handheld 28mm, 58 shots, canon 30D)
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fotomachi

Joined: 02 Feb 2008 Posts: 215 Location: Belgica
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use a NN with my Nikon D80. It is very easy to use, in my experience at least, though I don't use it that much. Many shots I can still make hand-held.
I have the NN3 btw. I like it most because of its low weight - a good travel mate  _________________ My glass --- fotomachi Lens Test Page |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Leslie

Joined: 20 Mar 2007 Posts: 738 Location: UK Swindon
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I’m interested to see the answers you get.
I don’t do a lot of stitch shots but when I do I have found a good tripod/ball head and the spirit levels are all I need.
I think the pano heads are more for those into doing multi rows? Not sure about that, I wait to see the replies.
I would question your choice of lens to do such work. Why if doing multi shots would you want a wide angle ‘Zoom’ lens which has questionable quality? The lens is well known for decentred focus an example of which can be seen on the Photodo review of the lens.
I am waiting for my FORTH copy of the Sigma 10-20mm. I have tried 3 and all were decentred.
PS I would love to see a 100% crop of some detail from your '58 shot' example. It must be HUGE. _________________ Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user.
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Athiril

Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 67 Location: Brunswick Heads, NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Sigma 12-24mm is a LOT better than the 28mm lens I currently have on my 30D I picked up for $10, the 12-24 will beat it at all focal lengths, then I have my 50mm f/1.4 G.Zuiko for greater focal length
These are my legs ill use the NN with - http://www.opticsplanet.net/zhumell-heavy-duty-tripod.html
http://www.fotoexpert.pl/goldphoto-yh324c-kamery-cyfrowe-produkt-3972.html
You still get very bad parallax errors on a normal tripod head, which is why these exist.
Resolution is 16351 x 5744
Photoshop wont open it today lol, keep getting cannot complete command due to program error.
So here is one of the original images from the stitch (yes I shot this in portrait orientation, with moving water over a horizontal plane, though I only got 6 places where I needed to fix water seems up).
http://www.photodan.com.au/IMG_0291.JPG |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Leslie

Joined: 20 Mar 2007 Posts: 738 Location: UK Swindon
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think you must have made a mistake.
16351 x 5744 from '57 shots'
Sorry about the 12-24 lens I can only judge by the many examples I have seen. _________________ Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user.
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Athiril

Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 67 Location: Brunswick Heads, NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, I didnt make a mistake. 58 shots
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lulalake


Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 533 Location: Near Austin Texas
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I have two pano heads, the Nodal Ninja (an older version of the NN3) and a Jasper engineering Pano head (URL below)
http://www.stereoscopy.com/jasper/panorama.html
They are both the same price.
In my opinion the Jasper is ahead of the NN in build quality, the NN However beats it out in several other aspects. The NN3 also has a boatload of accessories.
Now having said that I must contradict myself a bit.
If you are going to do only single row panos, I would suggest the Jasper. It’s heavier and the circular positioning stops are better marked than the NN. If you are going to do multiple rows the NN is the way to go.
Jules _________________ Heisenberg may have slept here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lulalake


Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 533 Location: Near Austin Texas
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What software are you using to stitch?
Thanks
Jules _________________ Heisenberg may have slept here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Leslie

Joined: 20 Mar 2007 Posts: 738 Location: UK Swindon
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lulalake.
I have a problem with the inconsistency here.
I know the purpose of a good pano head and know the problems one can have doing stitches. The two units you have look very good.
I have had no problem doing 6-12 image shots with tripod, ball head spirit levels and some care yet we have examples of 58 image shots done 'hand held'
If one can do 58 image panos 'hand held' is the expense of these pano heads worth it?
I find this confusing and I don't like being confused about something. _________________ Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user.
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lulalake


Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 533 Location: Near Austin Texas
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rob Leslie wrote: | Lulalake.
I have a problem with the inconsistency here.
I know the purpose of a good pano head and know the problems one can have doing stitches. The two units you have look very good.
I have had no problem doing 6-12 image shots with tripod, ball head spirit levels and some care yet we have examples of 58 image shots done 'hand held'
If one can do 58 image panos 'hand held' is the expense of these pano heads worth it?
I find this confusing and I don't like being confused about something. |
Yes it’s confusing. and pano heads are necessary.
Taking shots at infinity is no problem, no pano head is needed. If you are shooting objects closer than infinity they are necessary due to parallax.
Basically the camera has to rotate around the front nodal point which is at the entrance pupil of the optical system (generally at the front or actually inside the front of the lens) in order to stop the parallax instead of the back how one normally holds the camera.
(Notice in pictures of cameras mounted on pano heads you will generally see the lens is directly over the mounting screw)
Rather than rewrite the detailed explanation here are several URL’s that explain the science behind it
http://www.panoguide.com/howto/panoramas/panohead.jsp
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/digital-panoramas.htm
http://stitcher.realviz.com/image-stitching-tutorials/stitching-tutorials/panorama-parallax-0.html
http://www.panoguide.com/howto/panoramas/parallax.jsp
http://www.diyphotography.net/diy_the_panorama_head_el_cheapo
Cheers
Jules _________________ Heisenberg may have slept here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Athiril

Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 67 Location: Brunswick Heads, NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rob Leslie wrote: | Lulalake.
I have a problem with the inconsistency here.
I know the purpose of a good pano head and know the problems one can have doing stitches. The two units you have look very good.
I have had no problem doing 6-12 image shots with tripod, ball head spirit levels and some care yet we have examples of 58 image shots done 'hand held'
If one can do 58 image panos 'hand held' is the expense of these pano heads worth it?
I find this confusing and I don't like being confused about something. |
There was 1 error in the land itself that shouldnt occur, 2 on the shore line that shouldn't occur (didnt move), and 4 in the water which will have to occur due to the nature of them moving, I promoted each error into a layer, then split in half into another layer and worked on it with liquify brushes of various sizes, and then with the heal brush afterwards.
I also had a break or two in my horizon.
Okay since I'm doing multi-row, I'll probably for the NN5, hoping its better than the NN3 and has the best of both worlds.
Thanks for the info ^_^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lulalake


Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 533 Location: Near Austin Texas
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. I've had the same types of issues handheld, even at infinity. One frame will be tilted and the software has to compensate and it doesn't always do a great job.
I think the NN5 looks a bit sturdier and may be the answer.
Cheers
Jules _________________ Heisenberg may have slept here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Athiril

Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 67 Location: Brunswick Heads, NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lulalake wrote: | Yes. I've had the same types of issues handheld, even at infinity. One frame will be tilted and the software has to compensate and it doesn't always do a great job.
I think the NN5 looks a bit sturdier and may be the answer.
Cheers
Jules |
I often get breaks in powerlines when doing super-wide hand held, do you get this on the NN3? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lulalake


Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 533 Location: Near Austin Texas
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Athiril wrote: | | lulalake wrote: | Yes. I've had the same types of issues handheld, even at infinity. One frame will be tilted and the software has to compensate and it doesn't always do a great job.
I think the NN5 looks a bit sturdier and may be the answer.
Cheers
Jules |
I often get breaks in powerlines when doing super-wide hand held, do you get this on the NN3? |
I've only done one pano with a super wide (Canon 10-22), an interior handheld, and there are errors aplenty with it. Lots of PS afterwords. _________________ Heisenberg may have slept here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|