Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Suggest a pano head for me (looking at nodal ninja)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Films and Accessories
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Athiril



Level 1

Joined: 16 May 2008
Posts: 67
Location: Brunswick Heads, NSW, Australia

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 6:22 am    Post subject: Suggest a pano head for me (looking at nodal ninja) Reply with quote

http://nodalninja.com.au/products/

This is what im looking at, is the nodal ninja 3 Mk II good? fiddly? hard to set up? easy to use?

Or should I go with the nodal ninja 5L?

I plan on getting a Sigma 12-24mm and using it on my Canon 30D and on my EOS 500N film camera, as well as my Zuiko 50mm f/1.4 prime and a 28mm prime (manual lens).

What are you experiences?

I like to shoot stuff like this (handheld 28mm, 58 shots, canon 30D)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fotomachi



Level 1

Joined: 02 Feb 2008
Posts: 215
Location: Belgica

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use a NN with my Nikon D80. It is very easy to use, in my experience at least, though I don't use it that much. Many shots I can still make hand-held.

I have the NN3 btw. I like it most because of its low weight - a good travel mate Wink
_________________
My glass --- fotomachi Lens Test Page
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rob Leslie



Level 3

Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 738
Location: UK Swindon

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I’m interested to see the answers you get.
I don’t do a lot of stitch shots but when I do I have found a good tripod/ball head and the spirit levels are all I need.
I think the pano heads are more for those into doing multi rows? Not sure about that, I wait to see the replies.
I would question your choice of lens to do such work. Why if doing multi shots would you want a wide angle ‘Zoom’ lens which has questionable quality? The lens is well known for decentred focus an example of which can be seen on the Photodo review of the lens.
I am waiting for my FORTH copy of the Sigma 10-20mm. I have tried 3 and all were decentred.

PS I would love to see a 100% crop of some detail from your '58 shot' example. It must be HUGE.
_________________
Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user.
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Athiril



Level 1

Joined: 16 May 2008
Posts: 67
Location: Brunswick Heads, NSW, Australia

PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 5:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Sigma 12-24mm is a LOT better than the 28mm lens I currently have on my 30D I picked up for $10, the 12-24 will beat it at all focal lengths, then I have my 50mm f/1.4 G.Zuiko for greater focal length Razz

These are my legs ill use the NN with - http://www.opticsplanet.net/zhumell-heavy-duty-tripod.html
http://www.fotoexpert.pl/goldphoto-yh324c-kamery-cyfrowe-produkt-3972.html

You still get very bad parallax errors on a normal tripod head, which is why these exist.

Resolution is 16351 x 5744
Photoshop wont open it today lol, keep getting cannot complete command due to program error.

So here is one of the original images from the stitch (yes I shot this in portrait orientation, with moving water over a horizontal plane, though I only got 6 places where I needed to fix water seems up).

http://www.photodan.com.au/IMG_0291.JPG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rob Leslie



Level 3

Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 738
Location: UK Swindon

PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 9:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you must have made a mistake.
16351 x 5744 from '57 shots'

Sorry about the 12-24 lens I can only judge by the many examples I have seen.
_________________
Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user.
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Athiril



Level 1

Joined: 16 May 2008
Posts: 67
Location: Brunswick Heads, NSW, Australia

PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 2:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, I didnt make a mistake. 58 shots

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lulalake



Level 3

Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 533
Location: Near Austin Texas

PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,
I have two pano heads, the Nodal Ninja (an older version of the NN3) and a Jasper engineering Pano head (URL below)

http://www.stereoscopy.com/jasper/panorama.html

They are both the same price.



In my opinion the Jasper is ahead of the NN in build quality, the NN However beats it out in several other aspects. The NN3 also has a boatload of accessories.

Now having said that I must contradict myself a bit.

If you are going to do only single row panos, I would suggest the Jasper. It’s heavier and the circular positioning stops are better marked than the NN. If you are going to do multiple rows the NN is the way to go.

Jules
_________________
Heisenberg may have slept here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lulalake



Level 3

Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 533
Location: Near Austin Texas

PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What software are you using to stitch?

Thanks

Jules
_________________
Heisenberg may have slept here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rob Leslie



Level 3

Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 738
Location: UK Swindon

PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lulalake.
I have a problem with the inconsistency here.
I know the purpose of a good pano head and know the problems one can have doing stitches. The two units you have look very good.
I have had no problem doing 6-12 image shots with tripod, ball head spirit levels and some care yet we have examples of 58 image shots done 'hand held'
If one can do 58 image panos 'hand held' is the expense of these pano heads worth it?
I find this confusing and I don't like being confused about something.
_________________
Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user.
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
lulalake



Level 3

Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 533
Location: Near Austin Texas

PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rob Leslie wrote:
Lulalake.
I have a problem with the inconsistency here.
I know the purpose of a good pano head and know the problems one can have doing stitches. The two units you have look very good.
I have had no problem doing 6-12 image shots with tripod, ball head spirit levels and some care yet we have examples of 58 image shots done 'hand held'
If one can do 58 image panos 'hand held' is the expense of these pano heads worth it?
I find this confusing and I don't like being confused about something.


Yes it’s confusing. and pano heads are necessary.

Taking shots at infinity is no problem, no pano head is needed. If you are shooting objects closer than infinity they are necessary due to parallax.

Basically the camera has to rotate around the front nodal point which is at the entrance pupil of the optical system (generally at the front or actually inside the front of the lens) in order to stop the parallax instead of the back how one normally holds the camera.

(Notice in pictures of cameras mounted on pano heads you will generally see the lens is directly over the mounting screw)

Rather than rewrite the detailed explanation here are several URL’s that explain the science behind it

http://www.panoguide.com/howto/panoramas/panohead.jsp

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/digital-panoramas.htm

http://stitcher.realviz.com/image-stitching-tutorials/stitching-tutorials/panorama-parallax-0.html

http://www.panoguide.com/howto/panoramas/parallax.jsp

http://www.diyphotography.net/diy_the_panorama_head_el_cheapo

Cheers

Jules
_________________
Heisenberg may have slept here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Athiril



Level 1

Joined: 16 May 2008
Posts: 67
Location: Brunswick Heads, NSW, Australia

PostPosted: Sun May 25, 2008 3:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rob Leslie wrote:
Lulalake.
I have a problem with the inconsistency here.
I know the purpose of a good pano head and know the problems one can have doing stitches. The two units you have look very good.
I have had no problem doing 6-12 image shots with tripod, ball head spirit levels and some care yet we have examples of 58 image shots done 'hand held'
If one can do 58 image panos 'hand held' is the expense of these pano heads worth it?
I find this confusing and I don't like being confused about something.


There was 1 error in the land itself that shouldnt occur, 2 on the shore line that shouldn't occur (didnt move), and 4 in the water which will have to occur due to the nature of them moving, I promoted each error into a layer, then split in half into another layer and worked on it with liquify brushes of various sizes, and then with the heal brush afterwards.

I also had a break or two in my horizon.

Okay since I'm doing multi-row, I'll probably for the NN5, hoping its better than the NN3 and has the best of both worlds.


Thanks for the info ^_^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lulalake



Level 3

Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 533
Location: Near Austin Texas

PostPosted: Sun May 25, 2008 3:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes. I've had the same types of issues handheld, even at infinity. One frame will be tilted and the software has to compensate and it doesn't always do a great job.

I think the NN5 looks a bit sturdier and may be the answer.

Cheers

Jules
_________________
Heisenberg may have slept here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Athiril



Level 1

Joined: 16 May 2008
Posts: 67
Location: Brunswick Heads, NSW, Australia

PostPosted: Sun May 25, 2008 4:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lulalake wrote:
Yes. I've had the same types of issues handheld, even at infinity. One frame will be tilted and the software has to compensate and it doesn't always do a great job.

I think the NN5 looks a bit sturdier and may be the answer.

Cheers

Jules


I often get breaks in powerlines when doing super-wide hand held, do you get this on the NN3?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lulalake



Level 3

Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 533
Location: Near Austin Texas

PostPosted: Sun May 25, 2008 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Athiril wrote:
lulalake wrote:
Yes. I've had the same types of issues handheld, even at infinity. One frame will be tilted and the software has to compensate and it doesn't always do a great job.

I think the NN5 looks a bit sturdier and may be the answer.

Cheers

Jules


I often get breaks in powerlines when doing super-wide hand held, do you get this on the NN3?


I've only done one pano with a super wide (Canon 10-22), an interior handheld, and there are errors aplenty with it. Lots of PS afterwords.
_________________
Heisenberg may have slept here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Films and Accessories All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group