View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:49 pm Post subject: Street - by canon fd 35mm f2 |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
On nex5n, slightly pp add black level.
There is some CA/PF in high light edges, but I leave it there.
#1, at f8
#2, at f2.4
#3 at f4
#4, at f4
#5 at f2
#6, at f2
#7, at f8
#8, at f8
#9, at f8
_________________ La migliore cura di LBA � imparare una nuova lingua. Le meilleur rem�de de LBA est d'apprendre une nouvelle langue. La mejor cura del LBA es aprender una nueva lengua. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nisseliten
Joined: 26 May 2012 Posts: 332 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nisseliten wrote:
Excellent.. Where are these taken?.. Sweden?, Denmark? _________________
DSLR: Canon 550D, Panasonic DMC-GF3
SLR: Leica R3mot electronic, Leica R4s, Leica R4mot electronic. and more.
Medium Format: Many.
Lenses
Leica: 19/2.8, 35/2, 35/2.8x2, 50/2, 60/2.8 macro, 90/2, 90/2.8, 180/3.4, 250/4, 500/8 T-Noflexar 400/5.6
Other: When will it end?!
Canon: 50/1.8, 70-200 f4 IS
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3705 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
If this would be trick question 90% would answer T* here . Splendid! _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Thanks for the scenery and that is a fine looking lens
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rbelyell
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
hoan, these kick a**!!! i ,ove them all, but really love 2. i dont know anything about this system, except some of the lenses, including this one, seem exceptional. any impressions you care to share?
tony _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Top notch photography and top notch lens. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Nice shots.....the Canon FD 35mm f2.8 is a VG lens as well. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
Nice series...
I had experienced with white nose version and SSC one, both perform similar, except the SSC has little bit sharper at wideopen.
I'm not surprise with this results, 35mm lens sharpest at infinity. Which version do you have hoanpham? _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Wonderful series, thanks for sharing. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
Very nice Oslo shoots Hoan, hopefully i will have at the next visit a little bit more time for a real photo walk.
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
Thanks for all your kind comments.
Nisseliten,
I had a meeting in Oslo and spent 15min walk to central station.
Excalibur,
As we had discuss earlier, this lens does have flare reflection from the sensor plan, at least on the nex bodies. So direct sun/light in certain angles will cause problem.
I have been focused on the best properties of the lens. I use with a normal hood, deep enough to cover the crop sensor. Sharpest f-stop is f8, but very good allready from f4.
IAZA,
My is FD ssc.
Tony,
This is among the best 35mm I have, and not just one - I have 3 copies of this lens, with 3x F1 bodies, and almost complete FD/FL what worth to keep as a lens library: 20/2.8, 24/1.4, 35/2, 50/1.4, 55/1.2, 55/3.5 macro, 85/1.2, 200/2.8, and 135/2.
FD/FL lenses are bigger and heavier than other makers', but the fd 24/1.4 and fd 85/1.2 are the cheapest among equivalents.
The F1 body also among the most reliable.
Last edited by hoanpham on Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
hoanpham wrote: |
FD/FL lenses are bigger and heavier than other makers', but the fd 24/1.4 and fd 85/1.2 are the cheapest among equivalents. |
Not really. It greatly depends on the year of issue of the lenses that you compare. FL lenses are actually smaller and lighter than most full metal Japanese lenses of the same period, for example Hexanons or old school Minolta MC's. The really heavy ones are early breech locks FDs, later ones use progressively more plastic and are smaller and lighter. FDns are some of the lightest lenses available, FDn 2/35 is only 245grams, 2.8/35 is only 165gr. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RTI
Joined: 15 Jul 2011 Posts: 282 Location: Moldova, Chisinau
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
RTI wrote:
Nice shots, I've gotten a FD 35/2 was one of my favourites on nex, and now converted to SA mount. Is yours the concave front element version? and what is the minimum aperture? I've heard these thorium, concave front element lenses are considered best performers though never seen real life comparisons. _________________ Cameras: Canon 5DIII, Zorki-4, Canon AE-1
MF:Rokkor 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 58/1.4, Yashica ML 50/1.7, M39 Jupiter-9 (silver 1955), Zuiko 35-70/3.6
AF: Sigma Art 35/1.4, Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rbelyell
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
fermy wrote: |
hoanpham wrote: |
FD/FL lenses are bigger and heavier than other makers', but the fd 24/1.4 and fd 85/1.2 are the cheapest among equivalents. |
Not really. It greatly depends on the year of issue of the lenses that you compare. FL lenses are actually smaller and lighter than most full metal Japanese lenses of the same period, for example Hexanons or old school Minolta MC's. The really heavy ones are early breech locks FDs, later ones use progressively more plastic and are smaller and lighter. FDns are some of the lightest lenses available, FDn 2/35 is only 245grams, 2.8/35 is only 165gr. |
fermi, it is hard for me to believe the fd lenses are smaller/lighter than the hexanons. is that really true? _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
RTI wrote: |
Nice shots, I've gotten a FD 35/2 was one of my favourites on nex, and now converted to SA mount. Is yours the concave front element version? and what is the minimum aperture? I've heard these thorium, concave front element lenses are considered best performers though never seen real life comparisons. |
If you read my reply above, you can find something..
white nose is same concave one. _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RTI
Joined: 15 Jul 2011 Posts: 282 Location: Moldova, Chisinau
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RTI wrote:
IAZA wrote: |
RTI wrote: |
Nice shots, I've gotten a FD 35/2 was one of my favourites on nex, and now converted to SA mount. Is yours the concave front element version? and what is the minimum aperture? I've heard these thorium, concave front element lenses are considered best performers though never seen real life comparisons. |
If you read my reply above, you can find something..
white nose is same concave one. |
I did, you asked the same question Concave, also called "silver nose" _________________ Cameras: Canon 5DIII, Zorki-4, Canon AE-1
MF:Rokkor 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 58/1.4, Yashica ML 50/1.7, M39 Jupiter-9 (silver 1955), Zuiko 35-70/3.6
AF: Sigma Art 35/1.4, Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
rbelyell wrote: |
fermi, it is hard for me to believe the fd lenses are smaller/lighter than the hexanons. is that really true? |
If you exclude FD breech locks and compare the lenses of the same vintage, then the answer is generally, yes.
FL 1.8/50 is smaller and lighter than Hexanon 1.8/52. FDn 1.4/50 (235gr) is smaller and lighter than Hexanon 1.4/50 (even the later 265gr version). Same goes for FDn 2/35 (235gr) v Hexanon 2/35 (320gr), etc. Essentially if you compare equivalent FDn lenses with Hexanons, FDn will invariably be lighter.
However, FDn line does not have equivalent of the 40mm Hexanon pancake. That's the only reason why people think that Hexanons are small and light. In general they are heavier than FDn and Minolta MD lines. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rbelyell
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
fermy thank you so much, really appreciate the reply. i'm always on the lookout for small, light, high quality gear that can be used on both film and digital.
having said that, i dont think the AR 40mm pancake is the 'only' reason we think the AR series is smaller and lighter. ive had lots of different 'system' legacy glass and imo the AR series is the most compact ive used. in addition almost all lenses have the same size filter ring.
tony _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
rbelyell wrote: |
having said that, i dont think the AR 40mm pancake is the 'only' reason we think the AR series is smaller and lighter. ive had lots of different 'system' legacy glass and imo the AR series is the most compact ive used. in addition almost all lenses have the same size filter ring.
tony |
Well, all that depends on your point of reference. If you compare later Hexanons with early breech lock FDs or full metal MCs, Hexanons will be wonderfully compact, if you compare with MD II though, they will look rather bulky.
Yeah Hexanon had always 55mm filters, it's a good and bad thing. Canon and Minolta shrinked the filter size 55->52 and 55->49 respectively, I suspect that lead to a lot of weight saving. FLs were predominantly 48mm to begin with, so they are slim and slender. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rbelyell
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
good points that i didnt know. thanks.
tony _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|