View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Eriksen
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 Posts: 153
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 2:35 am Post subject: Strange CPL-filter effect.. |
|
|
Eriksen wrote:
I bought a Kenko and a Hoya cpl filter and tried to put them together as a variable nd filter, but the only thing that happened was that there was some color change when I turned on one of them. From a little added yellowish to bluish to the motif.
If I flipped one of them 180 degr, then I got the desired effect, but then the pl effect disappeared on the wrong-facing filter.
Is there something wrong with one of the filters, or is this something that sometimes occurs? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 514 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:12 am Post subject: Re: Strange CPL-filter effect.. |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
Eriksen wrote: |
I bought a Kenko and a Hoya cpl filter and tried to put them together as a variable nd filter, but the only thing that happened was that there was some color change when I turned on one of them. From a little added yellowish to bluish to the motif.
If I flipped one of them 180 degr, then I got the desired effect, but then the pl effect disappeared on the wrong-facing filter.
Is there something wrong with one of the filters, or is this something that sometimes occurs? |
I've heard of "weird things" happening when using two circular polarisers in conjunction, including a "large dark cross" occurring when nearing maximum effect. When I tried, with two circular filters of different manufacturer, that effect wasn't noticeable, but neither was an extreme darkening of the viewfinder image!
Using two linear polarisers proved to be totally satisfactory (and significantly cheaper) so I've not experimented further.
YMMV - Good luck |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16541 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:54 am Post subject: Re: Strange CPL-filter effect.. |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Eriksen wrote: |
I bought a Kenko and a Hoya cpl filter and tried to put them together as a variable nd filter, but the only thing that happened was that there was some color change when I turned on one of them. From a little added yellowish to bluish to the motif.
If I flipped one of them 180 degr, then I got the desired effect, but then the pl effect disappeared on the wrong-facing filter.
Is there something wrong with one of the filters, or is this something that sometimes occurs? |
A circular polarizing filter is a linear filter with a quarter wave plate behind, so it depends in which sequence you mount them together. Nothing "strange" about that. A variable ND filter however consists of two linear polarizers ... I remember that from physics class in school long ago. No longer tought I guess _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiftyonepointsix
Joined: 30 Apr 2017 Posts: 292
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
fiftyonepointsix wrote:
Using a Linear Polarizer in front of the CPL should work as a variable ND Filter.
I took Physics so long ago that they've changed the definition of the Meter a couple of times. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 902 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
fiftyonepointsix wrote: |
Using a Linear Polarizer in front of the CPL should work as a variable ND Filter.
I took Physics so long ago that they've changed the definition of the Meter a couple of times. |
It does, and this is how most Variable ND filters are made, if you use two linears it messes with AF & exposure on many SLRs.
Flipping the front CPL allows two CPLs to be used as a variable ND (the 1/4 plate first being fairly irrelevant, so the front one is effectively a linear polarizer.)
If you reverse the 2nd CPL, so as to use 2 CPLs back to back, you get weird effects! My physics isn't up to explaining them!
While the definition of a meter has changed it's length hasn't. They've just come up with definition that's more precise, constant & globally relevant. IIRC the original definition while based on the diameter of the earth, actually referred to the length of a particular solid object (a metal bar in France?), and it's now defined using a multiple of the wavelength of light produced by a specific reaction.
As science has improved the need for an accurate definition has been pushed several times in relatively recent years. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Polaroid Sunglasses marketing department taught me about that.
Seriously, i remember in early 1960s each pair came with a small card holding some polarization film; the piece of film was rotated in front of glasses to show effect and "prove" the glasses are indeed polaroid not fakes. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|