Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Sony A7 for $912 or Sony A7II for $1425
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2014 4:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mo wrote:
I would say the deadline is real,it would cover the boxing day sale time period.There may be only one or two items in stock...you know drumming up business for the crazy sales. But that's me being skeptical of sales practices over here.


yes Mo, I must research on the shops before ordering. Most cheap offers only are preorders anyway, no stock yet!


PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2014 4:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kuuan wrote:
fermy wrote:
Whoa! I like IBIS too. Is it worth half of the camera price or $500? Hell no. A7 at such prices looks like no-brainer.


haha, right! the A7II also means being early adapter, the A7 should be the more clever buy, specially if I'd resell later.

how about the freebe adapter? The Metabones that does AF with EOS lenses, or the Sony that does the same but better with Minolta Sony A mount lenses? I tend towards the Sony adapter, but most likely hardly would use either and wonder which one would be easier to sell?


Well, I would go for Canon purely on the basis that there is a lot more Canon lenses out there and they are more interesting, although ultimately it depends on how much better "better" is in practical terms.


PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2014 6:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, with legacy lenses , the Sony is a clear winner.
I have no problem with the A7´s ergonomy and the A7 is more comparable to a legacy SLR. It is lighter too.
I am not happy that they decided to make so many changes like those 2 buttons on the top. Having both bodies could be confusing.
The stabilization is a great plus for the II , I recognized.


PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2014 11:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

memetph wrote:
Well, with legacy lenses , the Sony is a clear winner.
I have no problem with the A7´s ergonomy and the A7 is more comparable to a legacy SLR. It is lighter too.
I am not happy that they decided to make so many changes like those 2 buttons on the top. Having both bodies could be confusing.
The stabilization is a great plus for the II , I recognized.


for AF legacy lenses the Sony adapter is better, right?

from fondling it I found the A7 to be one of the better handling cameras, but the II has upgrades it called for. I like small though.
Must say I hate the mock prism, consider an articulating EVF a 'must' for 'my camera'.

May still not buy at all! I am happy with my cams, easily could wait another 2 years before buying a FF model that is more to my liking. Bargain prices are tempting though, anybody push me please?

Layout whichever, it would be my first A7 anyways. Normal operation should become 'automatic'.


PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 5:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

reading reviews about online camera shops in Australia give reason for concerns, most seem to sell items without having them in stock. delivery is uncertain, correspondence unreliable.
if it finally would arrive in perfect order I am fine..


PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kuuan wrote:
memetph wrote:
Well, with legacy lenses , the Sony is a clear winner.
I have no problem with the A7´s ergonomy and the A7 is more comparable to a legacy SLR. It is lighter too.
I am not happy that they decided to make so many changes like those 2 buttons on the top. Having both bodies could be confusing.
The stabilization is a great plus for the II , I recognized.


for AF legacy lenses the Sony adapter is better, right?

from fondling it I found the A7 to be one of the better handling cameras, but the II has upgrades it called for. I like small though.
Must say I hate the mock prism, consider an articulating EVF a 'must' for 'my camera'.
.

I have no practice with AF adapters on the A7. I was thinking about MF lenses.
Compared to Canon SLR , the A 7 is for me superior as you can adapt almost every SLR legacy lens. The viewfinder works very well under real aperture . Focusing is easy. Exposure correction in the VF. A very good view finder in my opinion...sehr goat sucha.


PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

memetph wrote:

I have no practice with AF adapters on the A7. I was thinking about MF lenses.
Compared to Canon SLR , the A 7 is for me superior as you can adapt almost every SLR legacy lens. The viewfinder works very well under real aperture . Focusing is easy. Exposure correction in the VF. A very good view finder in my opinion...sehr goat sucha.


thank you Memeth for your thoughts.

I am well aware of the superiority of mirorless cams, of the E mount in particular, to adapt lenses, their EVF, which are 'sau guat' Wink, focusing asf. This because I am and have been using Sony NEX5N and Ricoh GXR M mount ( both with their optional EVFs ), even have completed a good lens selection of small rangefinder glass to go with them.
The question is if the good Aussi offers will make me jump to FF, the A7 or A7II. ( and I decided, see below Wink )

For manual lenses I have all the adapters for my NEX5n that will work on a A7.
However among the free adapters I can choose via redemption from Sony Australia there are two which are much more costly than the others, a Metabones adapter that autofocuses Canon EOS lenses and a Sony adapter ( LA-EA4 ) that autofocuses old Minolta and new Sony A mount AF lenses via translucent mirror technology as in Sony SLTs. I believe that the second autofocuses much faster than the first, and I reckon that Minolta AF lenses still sell rel. cheap. Therefore I think that I should prefer the Sony, however I wonder which is easier to resell, and a new Metabones does most usually sell for 50 usd more than the Sony.

Some shops are giving an additional 10% 'boxing day' discount valid for order until end of 28th of December. So I just finished my order! Smile A7 + 28-70 kit lens + ( hopefully, not 100% clear on the order ) free Sony adapter via redemption, total cost incl. shipping just under 1000 AUD, that is 820 usd, incl. ( bad ) conversion it cost me 700 Euro Smile Wish me good luck!


PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It sounds like a good deal,you are so lucky with the exchange rate in your favour Cool


PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 7:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mo wrote:
It sounds like a good deal,you are so lucky with the exchange rate in your favour Cool


thank's Mo, I hope so. Well, the Euro has not been doing well neither. Calculated by online exchange rate it would make about 665 or 670 Euro, but I paid with paypal and their conversion rate made it 700.


PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 8:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Servus Kuuan,
According to what I read on other forums, the AF with EOS lens can be very slow or even uneffective with some lenses.
My feeling is that then buying an EOS lens could be a bet.

Guat net goat. na kloaa!


PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

memetph wrote:
Servus Kuuan,
According to what I read on other forums, the AF with EOS lens can be very slow or even uneffective with some lenses.
My feeling is that then buying an EOS lens could be a bet.

Guat net goat. na kloaa!


Servus Memetph,

yes, I think that you are right. The Minolta AF lenses with the Sony adapter should do better. Just checked prices of Minolta AF 1.4/50 and 1.4/85mm lenses ( there seems to be no slower 85mm Minolta AF lens? ) two lenses that I'd be curious about with AF on the FF, but they aren't cheap. Either will try to score one of the other, or else sell the adapter.

olles kloa, echt guat und wundaboa Wink


PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 7:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mo wrote:
I would say the deadline is real,it would cover the boxing day sale time period.There may be only one or two items in stock...you know drumming up business for the crazy sales. But that's me being skeptical of sales practices over here.


indeed! now on the 29th I'd have to pay about 1370 instead of 985, and that NOT including the kit lens. phooa, if adding the kit lens I'd have to pay 1799.- + shipping, or nearly double the price I paid yesterday Shocked


PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A sad reflection of our sales techniques. I am glad you got in early Cool Very Happy


PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sadly, no such sales technique here in Europe, so we have to pay around 1050 Euros for body only regardless whether before or after Dec. 29 Wink


PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steve Huff about the A7 II:
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2014/12/27/the-sony-a7ii-real-world-camera-review-my-camera-of-the-year-2014/

"I will go ahead and say it…I have been reviewing cameras for 7 years. This Sony A7II is the most versatile, fantastic, useful and all around best priced for what you get camera I have ever reviewed. Bam!" Wink


PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing Steve Huff is at his best in used car salesman role. Even here, the cheapest A7 body only I see is around 950 Euro, the cheapest A7 II is 1700 Euros. So that's around 750 Euros for IBIS and slightly better button placement. So one can argue "fantastic", "versatile" and "useful", but "best priced" is BAMM indeed ... as in facepalm BAMM Laughing


PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, but it is interesting how he put the A7S above the A7/A7R. And then puts the A7 II before the A7S Wink
And there is more than IBIS and buttons who is different. A7 II is a completly new camera, very different from A7.

- Better screen (higher res, and tilts better)
- Better grip
- Better AF
- Better app support
- Better finish
- Better mount (stronger)
- Better IQ (colors and more pop)
- Better video (XAVC S Video and S-Log2)
- More quiet shutter
- Faster startup

So there is alot more than buttons and IBIS... And the buttons are not slightly better, they are much better combined with the bigger grip (I couldn`t use the A7R without the $300 batterygrip). So is the A7 II worth the extra 750 euro? I think so, but if you don`t like spending that much or can`t, buy the A7 which is a great camera for less.


PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I had bought the A7II instead of the A7, both with kit lens for the price of the sale expired 2 days ago, the Mark II would have cost me 450 to 500 usd more. I am sure that it's improvements are real, but some comments in videos pointing out the difference in size and weight made me think that the smaller A7 might fit me even better. It was the special sale that made me 'rush' buying my first FF, the cheaper option felt smarter, arguably it wasn't Wink
For now just hoping that I shall receive it!


PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 5:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

received a mail from the store saying that the regret to inform me that they are temporarily out of stock of my ordered camera, and that, because of "Sony delay", yeah their wording tries to blame Sony Wink, they expect to get new cameras between middle and end of January only, and that it will ship thereafter. Now, what a surprise Wink
They ask me to either accept the 'back order' or to 'cancel' it. I answered, that, to accept the backorder, I'd need them to give me a definite last day of shipment and a guarantee that I still could cancel and get full money back in case that it won't be met.


Last edited by kuuan on Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:29 am; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nordentro wrote:
Yes, but it is interesting how he put the A7S above the A7/A7R. And then puts the A7 II before the A7S Wink
And there is more than IBIS and buttons who is different. A7 II is a completly new camera, very different from A7.

- Better screen (higher res, and tilts better)
- Better grip
- Better AF
- Better app support
- Better finish
- Better mount (stronger)
- Better IQ (colors and more pop)
- Better video (XAVC S Video and S-Log2)
- More quiet shutter
- Faster startup

So there is alot more than buttons and IBIS... And the buttons are not slightly better, they are much better combined with the bigger grip (I couldn`t use the A7R without the $300 batterygrip). So is the A7 II worth the extra 750 euro? I think so, but if you don`t like spending that much or can`t, buy the A7 which is a great camera for less.


That's a useful list. Personally, I think that it's still not even close to 750 Euro difference, which is 300 Euros more than I paid for Oly E-P5, for instance. On the other hand, I like IBIS, I have enough toys to shoot with now, and A7II looks like a camera that I can use for a very looooooong time. So I would rather get A7 II in a year, when the price drops to current A7 levels. But if someone wants/needs to buy now, IMHO A7 is a much better deal.

In a year Steve Huff will, of course, write that A7 II is completely blown away by A7s II and/or A7III Wink


PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The A7 II might become dated in a few months already because the "old" sensor. It is some kind of a "semi-transitional" model before the new stuff comes out.

The D750 has a new 24MP Sony sensor which has better video and lower noise, they should have put that in there. Just adding a better video codec will not make a big difference if it is still line-skipping. Maybe they feared it could make it closer to the A7s.

Right now I am more inclined to save up for the A7s (there should be a price drop on this one as well soon) because it has the silent shutter, and at night it has a cleaner viewfinder image with better AF. I am mostly trying to capture moments though were higher shutter speeds or more DOF at closer distances are preferable. For landscapes the A7 II is a clear improvement.


One thing I fear though is reliability issues with the Steadyshot (they are known to fail on the sturdier A-mount cameras as well although only after a fair amount of time). One probably needs to treat this carefully I really don't think it would survive the amount of abuse that a DSLR can easily take and the repair bill could be big.


PostPosted: Thu Jan 01, 2015 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sad to hear that Kuuan,I hope it works out in your favour which ever way it turns out. I just don't trust the online sales practices over here.


PostPosted: Thu Jan 01, 2015 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nordentro wrote:
Yes, but it is interesting how he put the A7S above the A7/A7R. And then puts the A7 II before the A7S Wink
And there is more than IBIS and buttons who is different. A7 II is a completly new camera, very different from A7.

- Better screen (higher res, and tilts better)
- Better grip
- Better AF
- Better app support
- Better finish
- Better mount (stronger)
- Better IQ (colors and more pop)
- Better video (XAVC S Video and S-Log2)
- More quiet shutter
- Faster startup

So there is alot more than buttons and IBIS... And the buttons are not slightly better, they are much better combined with the bigger grip (I couldn`t use the A7R without the $300 batterygrip). So is the A7 II worth the extra 750 euro? I think so, but if you don`t like spending that much or can`t, buy the A7 which is a great camera for less.

this list of "better "is impressive . It has in my opinion more a rhetoric effect than a real one.
Some of those better are not important or almost not noticable as you can see in the first reviews.
The stabilization is a real impriovement which counts and which is not subject to discussion. But it comes to a price and makes the camera heavier.
700 $ is a big difference and the A7 is a graet deal, in my opinion.


PostPosted: Thu Jan 01, 2015 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mo wrote:
Sad to hear that Kuuan,I hope it works out in your favour which ever way it turns out. I just don't trust the online sales practices over here.


thank's Mo, I am quite confident. Reading the complaints of Australian customers I already have been expecting that exactly this will be happening, therefore no disappointments so far. I shall arrive in Australia second half of January only, so far the expected delivery time fits me perfectly well.

btw. recently I have been reading various threads at dpreview of users preferring the smaller size and lighter weight of e.g. the Alpha 6000 as compared to that of the A7 and of some that are not happy with the A7II being bigger and heavier than the A7. So far the opinions that the FF camera should or could be heftier have been dominating, the design of the A7II is a clear indication that Sony seems to listen to customers reports.
Now I am very happy that lately users publicly point out that the small size and little weight had been the prime reason to switch to Sony / mirrorless in the first place, and that therefore the A7II doesn't cut it for them. I hope these voices be loud enough, that Sony will listen again and soon will offer a second FF line, besides the 'A7II body line', that will be markedly smaller. The original A7 line would fall in between, the new, smaller cameras would ideal be for me.
For now looking forward to get the A7. It was above all this video comparing it to the A7II that dipped my favor to the smaller. lighter and cheaper A7, price difference was the other, most decisive point: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDAFFjINx60


PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 4:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

long due update about my online purchase at camerastore.com.au

soon after buying and paying for a Sony A7 with bundled kit lens on December 28th 2014 I had received a note saying that they are out of stock and that they shall be delivered between middle and end of January.

By the end of January I had not received any further notice nor the items bought, I then had contacted asking for an update on delivery dates.
It has been a long process, but after many emails during which a refund had been offered repeatedly which I repeatedly had not accepted, and quite a few calls finally a camera had arrived but not the lens! The camera obviously had been handled before, the factory seal on the box had been broken. After a few more calls and mails it was agreed that I'd return the camera in exchange for a factory sealed one which was promised to me on phone ( I recorded these calls ) would be sent to me within 24 hours of receiving the back camera and it was promised that the lens will follow before the end of the month, exact dates were given.

Once the camera was back at the store I received an email confirming the safe arrival and that it had been 'that' good that it immediately was sold to another customer. I was then prompted to accept a refund.

In my answer again I made clear, as I had done numerous times before, that I did not want to cancel my order, no refund. Soon an email from paypal notified me of money having been sent to me by a 'Daimond Nominees', earlier I had noted that the person I had correspondence with sometimes wrote an email using a 'camerastore' email, at other times a 'Daimondscamera' email.

Once again I wrote to camerastore that I did not intend to cancel my order, that I won't accept a refund but that I want the camera as bought!
The same person I have been dealing with, the only person which seems to be reachable by any email and telephone number given by 'camerastore', than called me and said that he has done everything he could and that he is not able to supply the items bought any time soon. After me confirming once again that I still want the items as bought he went on, knowing that my time in Australia is limited, promising that he would notify me when they arrive and could be sent to me, and continued that from now on he won't answer any email or call from me..

hm..
well, if I had known earlier I better had kept the camera, hoping to get a lens any time later. As it is I filed a complaint with an 'Australian Consumer Commission' but from what I read at their site the only help that most likely I shall receive is a reference to layers that I could use to file a case against the shop.

now accepting the paypal payment would be the easiest way out. However I hate being taken for a ride like this and would hate to back down.

any recommendation? any Australian that could advice me which was the best course of action? Is there any counsel in Australia helping consumers in such a case?

cheers,
andreas