 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DanielT74

Joined: 01 Apr 2011 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:45 am Post subject: Some pics with Schneider Kreuznach Xenon 0.95/50mm |
|
|
On Sony NEX-5n, the Xenon has an almost imperceptible vignette wide-open which increases a little stopped down. It may require a touch of cropping occasionally but very little. It is a big heavy lens even with the thin c-mount adapter but stopping down with the stepless aperture and very smooth focusing action makes it usable. It is tricky to focus it wide open though but after a few days I am getting a hang of it I think.
To be honest I was doubtful at first but I think it's a magical lens and especially if you don't mind the bulk and can get it at a reasonable price, I think it is worth it. It is very contrasty with vivid colours throughout. Wide open it is sharp enough to be usable if you nail the focus but renders in a dreamy painterly way and sometimes creates this swirly bokeh that some people love and others hate. The OOF is generally very pleasing (at least to my eyes) Stopped down to f2 and above it becomes quite sharp indeed but still seems to maintain a nice (not swirly) bokeh.
Anyway here are some test pics - a look is worth a thousand words they say.
Oh, I should mention that mine isn't a perfect copy - there is some damage on the coating of one of the rear elements, but probably not significant. So there could be better results to be had with the Xenon, I don't know.

Last edited by DanielT74 on Tue Apr 03, 2012 1:14 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GrahamNR17


Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1972 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
For some kinds of images, it's awesome and some others not so good
I love "getting used to" a new lens and finding it's strengths
I really love the portrait of the guy sitting at a table reading a magazine, and the bridge shot too  _________________
Cameras:
35mm: ME Super
120: Pentacon Six TL :: Pentacon Six
Digital: Olympus E-PL1 (for sale) :: Kodak DX6490 :: Pentax K10d :: Panasonic DMC-LS5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Zeiss Jena: MC Biometar 2.8/80mm (P6) :: Flektogon 4/50mm (P6)
Pentax: SMC M 2/50mm
Hoya: HMC 3.8/70-150mm (broken)
Cosina: 3.5-4.5/19-35mm
Industar: N-61 2.8/52mm
Helios: 44-2 2/58mm
Tamron: 02B 2.5/28mm :: 910P 6.3/95-205mm :: 103A 3.8-4/80-210mm
Kodak: Meniscus from 127 Hawkeye (on bellows)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Orio

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 28717 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting.
To be sincere, I was expecting some thing of more impact, considering the Schneider name... but still it's on the same image quality level of other top brands superfast lenses such as Nikon or Canon.
From what I have seen, I have to say that the Planar 1.2/55 Contax and the new Leica Noctilux 0.95 (rangefinder) look more contrasted and defined. But one must also consider that this Schneider lens is more than half stop faster than the Contax, and at such extreme apertures, even a half stop means a world of difference. As for the Leica Noctilux, it costs more than 6000 Euros, so it might well be a bit better... _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rbelyell


Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 3809 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it seems to me this lens has a rather unique quality in render color skin tones that i like, but thats of course subjective. i think for color portraits this is a very interesting combination. _________________ Ricoh GXR M mount; Olympus XZ-2; Fuji X20; Hasselblad XPan/45 & 90mm lenses; Bessa T Blue 101 Anniversary Ed./Rokkor 20/2.8, Canon 28/3.5, Nikkor 3.5/2.5; Summarit 50/1.5, CV Heliar 75/2.5, Elmar 90/4, Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Contax T*; Kodak Retina IV/S-K lenses 28, 35, 50, 85, 135 & 200mm; Konica TC-X/57/1.4; Zeiss Ikon 6x9; Mamiya 6; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris 6x6; Mercury 2 35mm; Holga 120 Pano
FOR SALE:
FUJI X20 brand new in box
ZEISS BIOTAR 75/1.5 Exakta mount w Konica AR mount adapter
ZEISS BIOGON 28/2.8 contax G conversion to M mount
ZEISS SONNAR T 135/4 nikon rf mount w M adapter
KONICA AR 24/2.8 & 100/2.8
KODAK RETINA REFLEX IV CAM like new with full set of 7 schneider kruezach lenses, extras
M42: Mir 35/2
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Orio

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 28717 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Note: I commented the wide open pictures. Stopped down, the lens gains a lot more contrast and sparkle. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DanielT74

Joined: 01 Apr 2011 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks you Graham and rbelyell. Yes, I am enjoying learning to use this beast! The f/0.95 is quite a challenge sometimes but NEX-5n makes the job just about as easy as it can be (viewfinder would make it even easier I guess).
| Orio wrote: | Interesting.
To be sincere, I was expecting some thing of more impact, considering the Schneider name... but still it's on the same image quality level of other top brands superfast lenses such as Nikon or Canon.
From what I have seen, I have to say that the Planar 1.2/55 Contax and the new Leica Noctilux 0.95 (rangefinder) look more contrasted and defined. But one must also consider that this Schneider lens is more than half stop faster than the Contax, and at such extreme apertures, even a half stop means a world of difference. As for the Leica Noctilux, it costs more than 6000 Euros, so it might well be a bit better... |
Yes, those are probably not fair comparisons. Canon 50/0.95 would be more appropriate and from what I've seen, the Schneider is a more capable lens.
Again, since mine is not a perfect copy others may do better, I am not sure.
What I am finding with it is that while it is not technically perfect at least at f0.95-f1.4 it creates lovely textures and adds an artistic quality to ordinary images at wide apertures. Stopped down it is extremely sharp:
100% crop:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nordentro


Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 1981 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2014-01-20
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Love the flower picture  _________________ "If you only shoot manual, why didn't you buy a manual lens from the start?!?" | Lens collection | Manuellfokus.no |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
qtmonster
Joined: 15 Jun 2011 Posts: 32 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gosh, when you said it rendered almost a painter-like quality, my jaw dropped on seeing the first photo of the girl. It just resembles an oil painting that is typically displayed in the Louvre, especially the Renaissance style. Me and wife got a chance to travel to Europe early last year (really far) and the visits to the museums was a treat.
The pink flower shot is gorgeous too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DanielT74

Joined: 01 Apr 2011 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thank you, Nordentro and qt. Yes, the first picture suggested painting very strongly to me (I have oil painting background before photography) and all I did was enhance the contrast a little with dodge and burn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DanielT74

Joined: 01 Apr 2011 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I should add that the standard c-mount adapter must be too thin for it - the focusing scale if off considerably and closest focus is at over 1m which is annoying. I sometimes unscrew it a bit to increase that but obviously that's not optimal. Not sure if this is an idiosynchrasy of my copy or if it needs another adapter. Anyone knows anything about it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
walter g


Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2053 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DanielT74 wrote: | | I should add that the standard c-mount adapter must be too thin for it - the focusing scale if off considerably and closest focus is at over 1m which is annoying. I sometimes unscrew it a bit to increase that but obviously that's not optimal. Not sure if this is an idiosynchrasy of my copy or if it needs another adapter. Anyone knows anything about it? |
I've ran into that problem with other lenses. You need a set of rings. I'm not sure where you buy them seperately, but look at the rings in this ad. This is like the set I have.
Click here to see on Ebay _________________
Main cameras
Minolta X370-N,Konica C35,Canon EOS 10D,Panasonic G1
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PF 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PF 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6, Vivitar Macro Focusing T/C in MD mount
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DanielT74

Joined: 01 Apr 2011 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 am Post subject: some more pics with the extension ring (but it's too thick!) |
|
|
tired:
Someone here once said that portraits should not be shot at below f/1.4. This is at f/0.95 and very close, I think it works. What do you think?
To add a few more comments on this lens after a few more weeks of using it:
1. It handles CA very well, in particular PF is not a major issue.
2. It can suffer from veiling flare
My copy apparently has schneideritis which shouldn't affect IQ and I am prepared to believe it except for the flare. Would like to hear from other users.
What makes this lens a joy for me is the lovely rendition wide open. People may not like the portrait above for expression/composition, but the rendition stands out for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DanielT74

Joined: 01 Apr 2011 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another try, this time a little stopped down:

Last edited by DanielT74 on Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:27 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZoneV

Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 714 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for showing these pictures!
I love fast lenses - and I think the portrait images look very good, I would be happy to see more.
I own the 25/0.95 sister, but have not used it up to now (lack of camera for that register distance at home - and the cameras at work need a labtop and power connection). _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
DSLR: Canon EOS 5D, EOS 350D with interchangable IR-Cut / IR-Pass filter / Grey filter
Lenses: Zeiss 50/1.4, 50/1.7, 85/1.4, 135/2.8 C/Y, M42, Converted Minolta Rokkor 35/1.8, 58/1.2, Converted Canon FD 50/1.4, 100/4, 300/2.8, Steinheil Quinar 135/2.8, ..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DanielT74

Joined: 01 Apr 2011 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for the interest!
Shot some pics with it today:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|