Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

SMC Pentax 150mm f/4 rocks!
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 8:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have bought a copy of this lens but it is still in the post...


PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

womble wrote:
I have bought a copy of this lens but it is still in the post...


Good one Like 1 .


PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 10:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It came up in my lens randomizer last week
What does the stranger want? by The lens profile, on Flickr


PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

D1N0 wrote:
It came up in my lens randomizer last week
What does the stranger want? by The lens profile, on Flickr


Nice shot!


PostPosted: Fri Sep 04, 2020 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It arrived...


SMC Pentax "K" 150mm f/4 (1) par Kris Lockyear, on ipernity


SMC Pentax "K" 150mm f/4 (2) par Kris Lockyear, on ipernity

Happy Dog


PostPosted: Fri Sep 04, 2020 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

womble wrote:
It arrived...


SMC Pentax "K" 150mm f/4 (1) par Kris Lockyear, on ipernity


SMC Pentax "K" 150mm f/4 (2) par Kris Lockyear, on ipernity

Happy Dog


I'm sure you'll love it!


PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have this lens. Here are a few photos.

#1


#2


#3


#4


PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2022 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

visualopsins wrote:
D1N0 wrote:
My Super-Takumar has 43741 on the a/m switch so it must be model II


If the switch labels are auto/man not a/m, then yes a model II.

Gerjan lists that number also for later model I, and, early model II had a/m switch labels.


It seems my copy is version one after all. Although it has all the signs of version two the rear element is narrower like version one and the rear retaining ring also looks like v1. This is information Gerjan and Takumarology guide seem to have missed.


On top is mine, the bottom 2 are the comparison in Gerjan's book. Left 2 and right 1


My serial number.

Also found another 2xxxxx serial that seems to be the same as mine.


#1





So at least some updated bodies seem to have the old lens elements in them. I have bought an S-M-C version to compare. It'll take a few weeks to get here. I will probably have to look for a true V1 with the older product number as well.... and maybe a V2 with wider rear element.....


PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2022 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

uddhava wrote:




Laugh 1 Like 1


PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2022 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks!


PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2022 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

D1N0 wrote:
visualopsins wrote:
D1N0 wrote:
My Super-Takumar has 43741 on the a/m switch so it must be model II


If the switch labels are auto/man not a/m, then yes a model II.

Gerjan lists that number also for later model I, and, early model II had a/m switch labels.


It seems my copy is version one after all. Although it has all the signs of version two the rear element is narrower like version one and the rear retaining ring also looks like v1. This is information Gerjan and Takumarology guide seem to have missed.


On top is mine, the bottom 2 are the comparison in Gerjan's book. Left 2 and right 1


My serial number.

Also found another 2xxxxx serial that seems to be the same as mine.


#1





So at least some updated bodies seem to have the old lens elements in them. I have bought an S-M-C version to compare. It'll take a few weeks to get here. I will probably have to look for a true V1 with the older product number as well.... and maybe a V2 with wider rear element.....



I checked ebay and found some more samples. Here a comparison between a 234xxxx and 385xxxx serial. Clearly different.



PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2022 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
The Konica Hexanon 1.8/40 and the Minolta MD 2/45 are both 43mm.


Thanks for that interesting piece of information, Ian.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZuikosHexanonsandVivitars wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
The Konica Hexanon 1.8/40 and the Minolta MD 2/45 are both 43mm.


Thanks for that interesting piece of information, Ian.


That's nonsense, of course. Both images taken from exatly the same position, using a sturdy tripod.
Guess which one is the Konica 40mm, and which one the Minolta 45mm Laugh 1




If we enlarge the Konica image to 112.5% (=45/40) it theroretically should fit the Minolta image. It does, proving that the focal lengths are 45mm/40mm:


S


PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

by the low size of the pic, i can only see the bottom one is sharper and much more details, anyway, i have none of these 2 lenses