| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 350
Location: Italy
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:56 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
enzodm wrote:
Ok, I resurrect this thread because two days ago I took this one in the late afternoon, handheld, with my usual Hanimex 400/6.3 (EDIT: 1/800 sec, f/6.3, ISO 400 on Canon 60D):
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
Last edited by enzodm on Tue Nov 04, 2014 8:30 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JC
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 25
Location: U.S.
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
JC wrote:
Last months lunar eclipse
Olympus Zuiko 300mm F/4.5 on OM-D E-M5. Consider it a 2D slice of a 4d image. this was the only way I could come up with to composite them using a single shadow orientation while keeping the moon in the same orientation as it was relative to me.
Not the best test of the lens, full moons are pretty flat. I should go out in the next couple of nights and really put it to the test. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JC
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 25
Location: U.S.
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
JC wrote:
| enzodm wrote: |
Ok, I resurrect this thread because two days ago I took this one in the late afternoon, handheld, with my usual 400/6.3:
|
That's pretty amazing for hand held. At least for me, I can't hand hold for shots like that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011
Posts: 800
Location: Berlin/Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
Sony Alpha A7 with Tamron 70-350mm F/4.5 (Modell 05A)
350mm
F8
1/125 Sec.
ISO 100
Sony Alpha A7 and Contax Vario-Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300mm
300mm
F6.3
1/150 Sec.
ISO 100
_________________
Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 350
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
| JC wrote: |
| enzodm wrote: |
Ok, I resurrect this thread because two days ago I took this one in the late afternoon, handheld, with my usual 400/6.3:
|
That's pretty amazing for hand held. At least for me, I can't hand hold for shots like that. |
"me too" usually, I was surprised of the result. I was against a wall, I tried to set focus using live view and then shoot using viewfinder.
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 7785
Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
There's some impressive moon shots in this thread. And most impressive is - the fact that expensive, specialist, equipment isn't needed. I shall drag out the big old Slik tripod ( aka 'the scaffolding' ) and one of my 300's.
Does local light pollution make a great deal of difference ?
_________________
LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 350
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
| Lloydy wrote: |
| ... And most impressive is - the fact that expensive, specialist, equipment isn't needed. |
In fact, this is what I used (the top one, the rest is for comparison  ). BTW it is a kind gift by iangreenhaigh, with some small amount of fungus I never tried to remove. I tried it even doubled with a cheap 2x, but there is not much more detail and it is much more difficult to control.
Regarding pollution: I'm not able to tell much, I'm in a relatively clean area. The last picture has been taken in the afternoon, in a nice sunny yet cold day.
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lucca1x
Joined: 09 Feb 2014
Posts: 93
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2014 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
lucca1x wrote:
mto 3m-5ca 500mm f8
I don't know if it's the best I took but this one was handy. I remember that the tair 300mm did good... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 551
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Canon 300D,Chinese 1000/F6.7 mirror lens on a grain bag. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 524
Location: WA, USA
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
I took some Super Moon shots some years ago and I cannot tell the differences from reqular moon shots. Here is the last moon shot I took; it was taken some time ago, but I don't think I posted it here:
E-M5 + Rubinar 1000/10
https://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/9528815674/
_________________
http://www.ipernity.com/home/2419272
https://laurphoto.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
All you guys photographed the same side of the moon. I got the other side.
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gaeger
Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 715
Location: Brier, Wash.
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
gaeger wrote:
Ha!
_________________
"Here's to the wonder" -- Alan Boyle
Nikkor/Nikon 20, 24, 28, 35, 50, 55, 85, 105, 135, 180, 200, 300, 400, 10-20, 18-35, 18-55, 28-50, 28-70, 24-85, 35-200, 50-300, 75-150, 80-200, 70-210, 70-300
Minolta Rokkor 24, 28, 35, 45, 50, 58, 100, 135, 300
My most interesting images | Full photostream
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ferruccio (genbaus)
Joined: 31 Aug 2010
Posts: 1
Location: Ferrara
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 1:06 pm Post subject: My two (Euro)cents |
|
|
ferruccio (genbaus) wrote:
Here you are with a couple of oldish pictures (actually it is the same picture resized and cropped). Taken with a strange combo: Century Tele Athenar II 650mm plus Leica 1,4x Apo converter plus Oly 1,4x 4/3 converter plus FT to MFT adapter plus E-PL1 body (EFL 2600mm). Manfrotto 055 + 322 head as main support, the secondary (sturdy) support was the steel grating of my window.
I love to take pictures of the Moon, I took hundreds, but this one is the best result I could achieve so far.
_________________
Ferruccio
Last edited by ferruccio (genbaus) on Wed Dec 10, 2014 1:12 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7554
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 1:12 pm Post subject: Re: My two (Euro)cents |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| ferruccio (genbaus) wrote: |
Here you are with a couple of oldish pictures (actually it is the same picture resized and cropped). Taken with a strange combo: Century Tele Athenar II 650mm plus Leica 1,4x Apo converter plus Oly 1,4x 4/3 converter plus FT to MFT adapter plus E-PL1 body (EFL 2600mm). Manfrotto 055 + 322 head as main support, the secondary (sturdy) support was the steel grating of my window.
I love to take pictures of the Moon, I took hundreds, but this one is the best result I could achieve so far. |
Wow!
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
drjs
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Posts: 485
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
drjs wrote:
| Tedat wrote: |
Sony Alpha A7 with Tamron 70-350mm F/4.5 (Modell 05A)
350mm
F8
1/125 Sec.
ISO 100
Sony Alpha A7 and Contax Vario-Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300mm
300mm
F6.3
1/150 Sec.
ISO 100 |
Super impressive! Looks like something taken with a telescope!
_________________
Follow me on 500px |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 350
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:41 pm Post subject: Re: My two (Euro)cents |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
| ferruccio (genbaus) wrote: |
Here you are with a couple of oldish pictures (actually it is the same picture resized and cropped). Taken with a strange combo: Century Tele Athenar II 650mm plus Leica 1,4x Apo converter plus Oly 1,4x 4/3 converter plus FT to MFT adapter plus E-PL1 body (EFL 2600mm). Manfrotto 055 + 322 head as main support, the secondary (sturdy) support was the steel grating of my window.
|
Great!
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011
Posts: 3669
Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
NEX-7 & EF 400/5.6L
Not the best of shots, it's not a super-moon, the 400 and all my AF glass is now long gone, it was my longest lens, what to replace it with?
_________________
A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nikono
Joined: 04 Nov 2014
Posts: 38
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
nikono wrote:
Moon in different perspective.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
maldaye
Joined: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 316
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
maldaye wrote:
| wolfhansen wrote: |
Hope this pic is not too OT....
 |
Dark City vibe to this - very noire - love it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
maldaye
Joined: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 316
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:59 pm Post subject: Re: My two (Euro)cents |
|
|
maldaye wrote:
| ferruccio (genbaus) wrote: |
I love to take pictures of the Moon, I took hundreds, but this one is the best result I could achieve so far. |
Shot to be proud of! Very high resolution indeed. Though I'm not sure how easy it is for most of us to get the same setup in motion! Talk about tinkering  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011
Posts: 800
Location: Berlin/Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
Sony A7 with Vario-Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
_________________
Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9097
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Not real sure how I could have missed this thread. I too like taking moon pics and I'm glad to see another Century Tele Athenar II user (feruccio and his spectacular pics of the half moon with his 650mm f/6.8 + teleconverters).
I don't recall using teleconverters with my Century Tele Athenars, but apparently I did because there's a shot below taken with my CPO 650 + a Nikon TC14a. Anyway, here is an assortment of mine. No known super moon pics, although I do recall viewing it last August with the naked eye and wondering what all the fuss was about. (with my naked eye I couldn't tell a difference)
I have taken moon shots with a variety of equipment over the years. Here is a comparison of the crescent moon I made between my Century Tele Athenar II 500mm f/5.6 (@ f/8 ) and my Tamron 55BB 500mm f/8 mirror -- a suprisingly good optic, which borders on a refractor in terms of contrast:
Here's a pic of the full moon using my CPO 500mm f/5.6 @ f/8:
Here's a pic of the full moon with my CPO 650mm f/6.8 @ f/11:
And a pic with the CPO 650mm + a Nikon TC14a:
Moonrise of a blood-red moon with my CPO 650mm. Shot taken at ISO 800 with my Canon XS (ISO 800 is very noisy with that camera). I had to use ISO 800 because I was getting motion blur (from the moon's movement) at slower shutter speeds and lower ISO values:
And a half-moon shot with my old Meade 10" LX3 Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope. What a beast that old scope was (10" diameter mirror, about 20" long), but it did take good pics. Nikon F2, Tri-X 400 film.
In addition to the above photos, there are a few more I would like to take that I haven't yet. Sadly, I took no moon pics with my Canon FD 400mm f/4.5 before it was stolen. But I have others still. I haven't tried out my Tamron 300mm f/2.8 LDIF yet. I'll probably use at least one teleconverter behind it. Maybe I'll stack a couple, see how they work out. I've determined through other tests that the Tamron 200-500mm f/5.6 zoom is actually a very sharp optic, so I'd like to give mine a try-out as well. I also haven't taken a full-moon image yet with my Tamron 55BB 500mm f/8 mirror; something I'd like much to do. And finally, I'd like to give it a try with my Sigma 600mm f/8 mirror, see if it can measure up to the Tamron mirror.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 4748
Location: Cheshire, England
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
Maybe this is a naive question - but I'll ask anyway. Does the moon look 'upside down' in Australia compared to Britain?
_________________
Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WNG555
Joined: 18 Dec 2014
Posts: 784
Location: Arrid-Zone-A, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WNG555 wrote:
^ I believe you answer is yes. The Moon should be flipped.
Here are some of my recent attempts with manual-focus lenses aimed at the Moon.
Konica Hexanon AR 300mm f/3.5 EE.
IMHO, pretty good detail for a 300mm.
 hALF eMPTY oR hALF fULL by wNG iMAGE aND dESIGN, on Flickr
 DSC00637c16-Konica Hexanon AR 300mm f4.5 by wNG555, on Flickr
This one shot with a Tamron SP 500mm f/8 55BB. Cooltouch's posts of his comparison inspired me to get one myself.
 DSC00442a_Tamron SP 500mm f/8 55BB by wNG555, on Flickr
And few artsy ones when the clouds got in the way...
 bAD mOON rISING by wNG555, on Flickr
With a modern Sony zoom at 210mm...
 Bad Moon Rising by wNG555, on Flickr
_________________
"The eyes are useless when the mind is blind."
Sony ILCE-6000, SELP1650, SEL1855, SEL55210, SEL5018. Sigma 19/30/60mm f2.8 EX DN Art.
Rokinon 8mm f3.5 Fish-Eye, 14mm f2.8 IF ED UMC. Samyang 12mm f2.8 ED AS NCS Fish-Eye.
And a bunch of Manual-Focus Lenses
My Flickr
Last edited by WNG555 on Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:08 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9097
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
That Konica does a surprisingly good job for a 300mm. That must be one helluva lens.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
