View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 961 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:25 pm Post subject: Schneider Curtagon 2.8/35 quick test shots |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
I recently acquired this Curtagon in pretty good shape. Came with the original box and a receipt from 1971. The lens was made in 1958, so I assume the receipt is from a second hand purchase. Only issue is the DOF scale has detached from the focus ring and no longer turns when you focus.
I can only find a diagram showing a 5 element scheme, but I count 6 reflections and Schneider's website lists 6 elements in 6 groups. I know that the Exakta and Edixa (m42 version) used different optics. Not sure if there is a practical reason or if it had to do with price.
In any event I've not heard many praise this lens, and I don't think I will be doing much praising either going by my test shots on digital.
^ shot at f/2.8
^ shot at f/5.6
The lens is very soft wide open. No point in showing a crop because it's apparent even in the resize. It is also very susceptible to flare which one would expect of any early wide angle lens.
At 5.6 though it is plenty sharp, and from corner to corner (well on my digital sensor, I'll wait and see on full frame).
Boke' quality is pleasing (to me) showing some character without being distracting. It is actually a little less nervous than with the Xenon.
This is an astonishingly heavy lens, robustly made of brass - it feels like it almost weighs as much as the Exa! None of that lightweight alloy Zeiss stuff from Schneider. It leaves much to be desired for wide open performance, but at average apertures it is really pretty sharp, and the rendering for an early retrofocus design is decidedly smooth. One thing that I can already see myself falling for is the color rendering. The contrast and color stood out as soon as I got the images downloaded on my comp. Other wide angles from this era that I have used deliver rather soft colors and flat contrast, so I was surprised by how saturated and how crisp these images were even for the strong front and side lit conditions.
Mixed performance overall, but it looks good on my Exaktas. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
Interesting, how's it's performance compared to Black curtagon 35? _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3693 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
What a beauty. Collector's passion kicks in. _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 961 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
IAZA wrote: |
Interesting, how's it's performance compared to Black curtagon 35? |
I seem to recall the later compact version performing a little better wide open. I know Schneider revised some of their lenses, so it's not beyond belief the Curtagon also got recalculated sometime between the 1950s and the late 1960s. Or at least that coating technology improved. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7553 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Mos6502 wrote: |
IAZA wrote: |
Interesting, how's it's performance compared to Black curtagon 35? |
I seem to recall the later compact version performing a little better wide open. I know Schneider revised some of their lenses, so it's not beyond belief the Curtagon also got recalculated sometime between the 1950s and the late 1960s. Or at least that coating technology improved. |
There are two types of compact C-Curtagon. As I heard, the heavy version with phillips screw is better than the light version with improved coating. Later, Schneider made the SL-Angulon for Rollei which is the most versatile 35mm I have. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Basilisk
Joined: 21 Mar 2013 Posts: 356 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Basilisk wrote:
Don't bother putting film in it, just walk round town holding it and wait for all the admiring looks… |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrBB
Joined: 26 Mar 2014 Posts: 79 Location: Croatia
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DrBB wrote:
Looks better than my c-curtagon, but - bit pricey for my wallet, why so expensive? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 961 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
DrBB wrote: |
Looks better than my c-curtagon, but - bit pricey for my wallet, why so expensive? |
Some sellers think any old German lens is worth a fortune. I paid less than $50 for mine, but it has the problem with the DOF scale. I think that's about a fair price for a user lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paulius
Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Posts: 321 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paulius wrote:
Here is a picture taken with Retina Curtagon 35/2,8. on Canon 5D m-k II. Aperture is f4.
[/url]
Last edited by Paulius on Wed Nov 26, 2014 11:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paulius
Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Posts: 321 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paulius wrote:
And central portion:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paulius
Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Posts: 321 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paulius wrote:
However corners are blur.
Is Exacta version works the same way?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|