Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Scanned with Plustek OptikFilm 8200 series
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:39 am    Post subject: Scanned with Plustek OptikFilm 8200 series Reply with quote

I had this film in my Leica M6 since last Christmas un-scanned so I took the opportunity to try out a 'Plustek OptikFilm ' 8000 series scanner from a camera club mate , at 3.600 DPI to see how it compares with my CANON 9000F Mk II at 2,400 DPI. It scanned with a 'Blueish' cast which I corrected in FastStone Image Viewer as I would in the darkroom with filters.
[/b]35mm f1.4 Summilux


50mm f2 Summicron



PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

...

Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 6:48 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I used Vuescan Professional with the Scanner set to 'Generic Colour Film' as that gives better results than trying to match the film with the Vuescan 'Pre-sets' . YES -- I am happy with the results but I cannot tell any 'Difference' between the Plustek and my Canon 9000F Mk II flatbed.


PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 3:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

...

Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 6:48 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BlazerOne, at a minimum, I would suspect he would see an increase in image definition with the Plustek scanner. A difference between 3600 ppi and 2400 ppi should be noticeable. If he didn't see a difference, then it sounds to me like 2400 ppi or less was the possible resolution limit of the film. But from personal experience using flatbed scanneras at 2400 ppi and another scanner at 4000 ppi, if the film was a hi-rez film, like slides, there should be a substantial difference in resolved detail between these two resolutions.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

...

Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 6:48 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think the PLUSTEK does give a higher resolution than the Canon 9000F Mk II -- I CAN see a difference now. I have to use the CANON for Medium Format though.


PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2020 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That Canon should work great for medium format. I have an Epson 4990, roughly equivalent to the Canon. It does a really nice job with my medium format shots, set to 2400 ppi.

These days, I dupe my 35mm slides and negs with my NEX 7 and a dupe rig I've cobbled together. It's 24.3mp sensor delivers 4000x6000 res images, which is plenty good enough for me.