View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Manichaean
Joined: 03 Oct 2013 Posts: 68
|
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2019 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Manichaean wrote:
padam wrote: |
Konica AR 35/2
|
I recently bought one of these. Very sharp and great colors. But very hard to find in decent condition and for reasonable price. As well as other Konica fast primes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arninetyes
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 312 Location: SoCal
Expire: 2013-03-26
|
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2019 2:57 am Post subject: /Users/richard/Desktop/CactusFlowers_DSC_1760sm.jpeg |
|
|
Arninetyes wrote:
If you can stretch your budget a bit higher, I highly recommend the Carl Zeiss 35/2 Distagon. I got mine for under $400, and it's easily my favorite fast 35. It's excellent close up and distant, has superb color saturation and contrast, and is beautifully built with perfect focus mechanism and feel.
Here's close up of a blooming cactus.
And a pic of desert dandelions, stopped down for depth of field. The distant mountains are rendered very sharp.
_________________ The longer I use autofocus lenses,
The greater my preference for manual focus grows. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1121
|
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2019 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
There's a voigtlander 35 1.4 on sale for 540€ , not cheap budget , but there aren't many options so fast around, in Sony mount |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2019 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Well, since it hasn't been mentioned yet, I thought I should -- the Nikon 35mm f/1.4. This lens, back in the day, used to be very pricey, but it seems that it has dropped down to "reasonable" in terms of prices now. I just had a look on eBay and I found several listings ranging from $250 to $300. In its day it was considered "the" fast 35mm. I dunno how it fares against more modern fast 35s, but I'll wager it still hangs in there reasonably well.
I owned a pre-AI model that had been AI'd by Nikon back when I was a camera dealer almost 30 years ago. I got to use it only briefly before I sold it, but it sure was fun to use while I had it. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2019 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
Well, since it hasn't been mentioned yet, I thought I should -- the Nikon 35mm f/1.4. This lens, back in the day, used to be very pricey, ... In its day it was considered "the" fast 35mm. I dunno how it fares against more modern fast 35s, but I'll wager it still hangs in there reasonably well.
I owned a pre-AI model that had been AI'd by Nikon back when I was a camera dealer almost 30 years ago. I got to use it only briefly before I sold it, but it sure was fun to use while I had it. |
I have the Nikkor AiS 1.4/35mm (slightly improved optics compared to the the earlier pre-Ai), and i've been using it recently during a trip to Rome. The lens clearly is a "character lens", which means it is very soft wide open (even in the center), and has a lot of "smearing" towards the edges. This can be used to get nice images of candlelight scenery, and for "soft" portraits. If one needs good corner-to-corner resolution, f8 or f11 is recommended. Lateral CAs are quite pronounced, but can be easily removed by software. The lens clearly has the "1960s" glow, and lots of aberrations wide open. Depending on your work, you may like this - or not!
Some fast vintage lenses such as the Minolta MC-X 1.8/35mm or the Carl Zeiss CY Distagon 1.4/35mm have a distinctively more balanced correction, and modern 1.4/35mm lenses (starting with the Sigma) are completely different - very sharp, even in the corners, even at f1.4.
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Shriver
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 Posts: 193
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
John Shriver wrote:
The Canon LTM 35/1.8 is well-behaved, small, light, and well-built. Not as sharp as a modern lens wide open, of course. About my favorite LTM lens. Good chance of getting one in your budget. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2019 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Here's the little overview i did some years ago:
100% crops from the corners of the Sony A7II (24MP FF).
Maybe it's useful for a first impression.
Stephan.
EDIT: click on the image to view it at 100%!! _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
orly_andico
Joined: 02 Jul 2008 Posts: 253 Location: Philippines
|
Posted: Fri May 10, 2019 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
orly_andico wrote:
CV 35/1.4 in M-mount? works on Sony.
It's soft and has a lot of CA at f/1.4 so I would consider it an f/1.8 or f/2 with an "emergency" f/1.4 mode.
Got mine used for $330. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Antoine
Joined: 08 Jan 2016 Posts: 298 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Antoine wrote:
Thanks Stephan,
Looks to me the Minoltas 35mm 1.8 are among the best performers... despite a bit of CA at list for this limited test. A bit surprising as some consider the MD 35mm 1.8 as a limited performer.... Maybe sample variation? _________________ Antoine
Sony A6000 APS-C and Sony A7 Rii
Minolta Fisheye MD Rokkor 7.5 mm f4, Fisheye MD 16 f2.8 MD R 17mm f4, MD R 20mm f2.8, MC VFC & MDIII 24mm f2.8, MD 28mm f2.0 &3.5, MD II 35mm 1.8, MD 45mm f2.0, MD 50mm f 1.2 & MD I f1.4, MC PG 58mm 1.2, MD 85mm f2.0, MD R 85mm f2.8 Varisoft, MC 85mm f1.7 MD R 100mm f2.5, MD R 100mm f4.0 macro, MD III 135mm f2.8, MD R 200mm f2.8 & 4.0, RF 250mm f5.6, MD 300mm f4.5, MD APO 400 mm f5.6, RF 500mm f8.0, RF 800mm f8.0 *2 300-s and 300-l
100 mm f4 macro bellows (5/4)
Vivitar 17mm f3.5, Elicar 300mm mirror f5.6, Zhongi turbo ii
Sigma 16mm f 2.8 fish eye
Zooms:24-50 mm f4, 35-70 mm f3.5 macro, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5, 50-135 f 3.5, 70-210 f4 and MD APO 100-500 mm f8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Antoine wrote: |
Thanks Stephan,
Looks to me the Minoltas 35mm 1.8 are among the best performers... despite a bit of CA at list for this limited test. |
When it comes to "sharpness", not only in the center but also on the borders and in the corners, the two 1.8/35mm lenses certainly are the best fast lenses tested here (of course many 2.8/35mm vintage lenses are better performers). That said, for some purposes one might prefer the strong "smearing" of a 1.4/35mm Nikkor or a 2/35mm Hexanon...
Antoine wrote: |
A bit surprising as some consider the MD 35mm 1.8 as a limited performer.... Maybe sample variation? |
I have tested two MC (MC-I and MC-II) and two MD 1.8/35mm (MD-II and MD-III). Their performance is very similar.
On other occasions, i have tested a series of several Minolta zooms (e. g. seven samples of the AF 4-4.5/28-135mm and eleven samples of the Minolta MD 3.5/35-70mm). Due to their complicated mechanical construction, these zooms certainly are more susceptible to sample variation than the corresponding primes - nevertheless the results were astonishingly uniform.
There are "lemons", though. Among my >250 Minolta lenses, there was a abysmal MC-II 2.8/135 mm (really bad corners even at f11, maybe a reversed back element), and an obviously weak MD 4.5/75-200mm.
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|