Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Raw vs jpeg

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> The Photographer's Café
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Attila



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 16502
Location: Budapest,Hungary

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:15 pm    Post subject: Raw vs jpeg Reply with quote

I'd like to know about your opinion why need to shoot in RAW format or why not.

Benefits to shoot immeditaly in jpeg.

1) no conversion time
2) storage place is lot less
3) I didn't see any quality difference (might be I am blind)

From RAW

1) better post-processing capability
??
_________________

Olympus E-1,Bessa L,Bessa RF Skopar 10,5cm,Besa I Color Skopar 105mm,Olympus OM2n,Nikon FA,Yashica Eletro 35 GN,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Zeiss Jena:Flektogon 2.8/20mm,4/25mm,2.4/35,2.8/65mm,4.5/4cm Tessar, 8/500mm Fernobjektiv
Pancolar 1.4/55mm,1.8/50mm,1.8/80mm,Tessar 2.8/50mm,Biotar 2/58mm,1.5/75mm,1.5/7,5cm
Carl Zeiss: Sonnar 2.8/135,2.8/180mm,Tessar 4/135mm
Nikon: 3.5/20mm,2.8/28mm,1.4/35mm,1.4/50mm,1.2/50mm,2/50mm,1.8/105mm,2.5/105mm,4/200mm macro,4.5/300mm
Pentax: Pentax 1.2/50mm,1.8/85mm,4/200mm
Helios: Helios-40 1.5/8,5cm,Helios-44-1 2/58mm,Helios-44-2 2/58mm
Olympus OM: 3.5/18mm,3.5/21mm,1.4/50mm,3.5/55mm macro,2.8/135mm,2/90mm macro,35-70mm,60-250mm
Meyer: 4.5/35mm Primagon,Primoplan 1.9/58mm,1.9/75mm,2.8/100mm,Orestegor 2.8/135mm,4.5/40 Helioplan
Leica: 4/100 Macro Elmar,2.8/90 Elmarit last version
Please visit my Ebay shop to support my reviews !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12692
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Raw vs jpeg Reply with quote

Attila wrote:


From RAW
1) better post-processing capability


This.
If you shoot pictures to keep, this is priceless.
For "junk shooting", such as lens testing, JPG is perfect - or do like me, I delete all lens test files (except those that have Melissa in them)
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Flor27



Level 3

Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 1202
Location: Paris, France

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In RAW, you can reveal more details in low light parts of a scene. The missing bits in JPEG are really missing taht way.
_________________
Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lahnet



Level 3

Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 656
Location: Denmark

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I always shoot RAW files. The two most impotent issues in my opinion is the control over exposure and W/B. You also work in 16bit.

About the conversion time, I must say I am having troble to see how it takes more time to PP a RAW file compared to a JPEG.

I am using CS3 and I do most thing when the pictures is still in RAW. Then I open it in photoshop and make the final things if needed. In the end I save as JPEG. I do not keep RAW files on my PC unless special occasions.
_________________
Henrik
Lahnet-Foto
My FLICKR
Lens list
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Attila



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 16502
Location: Budapest,Hungary

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also followed to shoot in RAW and kept only the best RAW files, but I was lazy to wait for jpeg convert, so I started shoot everything in jpeg seems I wrong exposition control is important. I am pretty satisfied with ACDSEE explosure control it works pretty fine with Jpeg.
_________________

Olympus E-1,Bessa L,Bessa RF Skopar 10,5cm,Besa I Color Skopar 105mm,Olympus OM2n,Nikon FA,Yashica Eletro 35 GN,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Zeiss Jena:Flektogon 2.8/20mm,4/25mm,2.4/35,2.8/65mm,4.5/4cm Tessar, 8/500mm Fernobjektiv
Pancolar 1.4/55mm,1.8/50mm,1.8/80mm,Tessar 2.8/50mm,Biotar 2/58mm,1.5/75mm,1.5/7,5cm
Carl Zeiss: Sonnar 2.8/135,2.8/180mm,Tessar 4/135mm
Nikon: 3.5/20mm,2.8/28mm,1.4/35mm,1.4/50mm,1.2/50mm,2/50mm,1.8/105mm,2.5/105mm,4/200mm macro,4.5/300mm
Pentax: Pentax 1.2/50mm,1.8/85mm,4/200mm
Helios: Helios-40 1.5/8,5cm,Helios-44-1 2/58mm,Helios-44-2 2/58mm
Olympus OM: 3.5/18mm,3.5/21mm,1.4/50mm,3.5/55mm macro,2.8/135mm,2/90mm macro,35-70mm,60-250mm
Meyer: 4.5/35mm Primagon,Primoplan 1.9/58mm,1.9/75mm,2.8/100mm,Orestegor 2.8/135mm,4.5/40 Helioplan
Leica: 4/100 Macro Elmar,2.8/90 Elmarit last version
Please visit my Ebay shop to support my reviews !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jesito



Level 3

Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 2410
Location: Sitges, (Spain)

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also shoot always raw.
If you have to adjust levels, jpg degrades quickly, and I find myself too often correcting things that had to be done properly when shooting....
Once the picture adjusted, you can save it in .jpg and delete the raw, if the space matters.
Best regards.
Jes.
_________________
Jesito's backsack:
Zooms Sigma 18-200, Tamron 35-135 and 70-210 short, 70-210 long, 28-70 CF Macro (Adaptall)
Fixed CZJ Planar 50mm 1.7, Helios 44-2, Cosinon 28mm, CZJ Sonnar 135, Industar-61, Jupiter-9, Industar-50, CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tamron 24mm, Tamron 135mm, Sands Hunter 135mm, Weltblick 135mm
DSLR Canon 350D, Pentax *1stDS, SIGMA SD-9
TLR/6x6/645 YashicaMat, Mamiya 645E, Petri 6x45, Nettar
SLR Minolta X300, Fuji STX II, Praktica VLC3, Pentax P30t, Pentax SF7, EXA500, EXA 1A, Spotmatic(2), Chinon CM-4S,
Rangefinders Chinon 35EE, Konica C35 auto, Olympus 35RC, Canonet 28, Yashica Lynx, FED-2, Yashica electro 35, Argus C3, Regula Cita III, Voigtlander Vitoret LR, Welta Welti-I, Argus C4, Kodak Signette 25, Zorki-4, Bessa-R
Compact Film Konica C35V, Voigtlander Vitorets, Minox 35 ML, Canon Prima Super 105
Compact Digital Caplio GX100, Aiptek Slim 3000, Canon Powershot 520


Life is that boring wasted time in between two pictures
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
patrickh



Level 4

Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 3605
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raw IMHO definitely gives more detail, especially in the shadows, but even in the highlights. You also have more ability to correct exposure errors/idiosyncracies (and who hasn't made a mistake in an initial setting to ruin a whole session?). My processing is done with Bibble, which I find very fast on my iMac. It also runs on Micros##t and Linux. Another recent advantage in Bibble (compared with PS) is the ability to have plugins that operate on the RAW file. Remember - every time you save a jpeg it degrades further. There are also plenty of other raw processors that are highly regarded. I have also found that developments over the past few years in software has allowed me to go back and redo some of my earlier efforts to great advantage.
There have been numerous debates on this subject in other forums - relating to all makes of camera - and I believe the consensus is that for quality you cannot beat raw.
As for space - with 300G discs at $100 here in the US, it is almost a non-problem. Additionally you can store massive amounts on a CD or even a DVD and keep them off the main machine.

My two pennorth


patrickh
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D70 Nikon D200 Canon 40D
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, Nikkor 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 3004.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Kiron 28/2 Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Flektogon 35/2.4, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Arsat 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro,Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Jupiter 135/4, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8, 35/2.8
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12692
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My advice in any case is, for the pictures that are really worth,
MAKE PRINTS
MAKE PRINTS
MAKE PRINTS

Don't let them in digital only. If something happens to your stored file you lose everything. I make double DVD backups of stuff, but I tell you, some old CDs and DVDs that I have saved in the early 2000s are now corrupted - BOTH of them. So double copy saving is not a 100% guarantee.

While on the other hand, simple prints, home made black and white prints (my father had the dark room) that I have from the 60s, are still there, in good shape. I can scan them high-res and print them larger if needed.

Do print.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Farside



Level 3

Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 1879
Location: Ireland

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
My advice in any case is, for the pictures that are really worth,
MAKE PRINTS
MAKE PRINTS
MAKE PRINTS

Don't let them in digital only. If something happens to your stored file you lose everything. I make double DVD backups of stuff, but I tell you, some old CDs and DVDs that I have saved in the early 2000s are now corrupted - BOTH of them. So double copy saving is not a 100% guarantee.

While on the other hand, simple prints, home made black and white prints (my father had the dark room) that I have from the 60s, are still there, in good shape. I can scan them high-res and print them larger if needed.

Do print.


I agree with archival printing where possible if the image is imporant. A tip for long-lasting CDs and DVDs - Burn at slow speed and use only good brands. The last point is obvious, the first less so.
_________________
Dave

The Lenses of Farside

"The largest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and
prosperity is no longer socialism. It is, instead, the ambitious,
arrogant, unscrupulous ideology of environmentalism."

-- Czech President Vaclav Klaus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7849
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, I agree.

I shoot in RAW+JPG, look at the photos, delete the bad one, keep the mediocre ones as JPG (to save space) and the good one as RAWs.
I have copies on DVD and on three harddisks.
And about four times a year, I print the best pics.

This makes me feel rather save. But complete safety is an illusion...
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS 50e, EOS 500, Spotmatic SPII, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;3.5/135;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: CZJ Flek 4/20; Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35; Summicron 2.0/50 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Zeiss 2.8/50; Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; MIR38 3.5/65; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Attila



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 16502
Location: Budapest,Hungary

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I always make two DVD copies from my pictures, I had never problem with VERBATIM DVD-s, they are were always reliable , but I agree with Orio need to print the most important pictures especially from family.
_________________

Olympus E-1,Bessa L,Bessa RF Skopar 10,5cm,Besa I Color Skopar 105mm,Olympus OM2n,Nikon FA,Yashica Eletro 35 GN,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Zeiss Jena:Flektogon 2.8/20mm,4/25mm,2.4/35,2.8/65mm,4.5/4cm Tessar, 8/500mm Fernobjektiv
Pancolar 1.4/55mm,1.8/50mm,1.8/80mm,Tessar 2.8/50mm,Biotar 2/58mm,1.5/75mm,1.5/7,5cm
Carl Zeiss: Sonnar 2.8/135,2.8/180mm,Tessar 4/135mm
Nikon: 3.5/20mm,2.8/28mm,1.4/35mm,1.4/50mm,1.2/50mm,2/50mm,1.8/105mm,2.5/105mm,4/200mm macro,4.5/300mm
Pentax: Pentax 1.2/50mm,1.8/85mm,4/200mm
Helios: Helios-40 1.5/8,5cm,Helios-44-1 2/58mm,Helios-44-2 2/58mm
Olympus OM: 3.5/18mm,3.5/21mm,1.4/50mm,3.5/55mm macro,2.8/135mm,2/90mm macro,35-70mm,60-250mm
Meyer: 4.5/35mm Primagon,Primoplan 1.9/58mm,1.9/75mm,2.8/100mm,Orestegor 2.8/135mm,4.5/40 Helioplan
Leica: 4/100 Macro Elmar,2.8/90 Elmarit last version
Please visit my Ebay shop to support my reviews !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
patrickh



Level 4

Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 3605
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

@Elan

It is quite possible to print from a TIFF - and there you are really talking space!

patrickh
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D70 Nikon D200 Canon 40D
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, Nikkor 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 3004.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Kiron 28/2 Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Flektogon 35/2.4, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Arsat 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro,Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Jupiter 135/4, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8, 35/2.8
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12692
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ElanR wrote:

As far as I know, all printers convert the image to JPEG before printing. So regardless of the input, the final image is printed from a JPEG file.


And this is the reason why I custom convert all my tif files prior to giving them to the photo shop for prints. I prefer to convert them my way, rather than let a crappy machine preset do the conversion for me. Especially with regards to colours.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> The Photographer's Café All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group