Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
RAW convertor comparison site

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Photo Software and Digital Processing
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bob955i



Level 3

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 1844
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 8:26 am    Post subject: RAW convertor comparison site Reply with quote

Worth a look....

http://photomann.multiply.com/journal/item/59
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7849
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for link! Very interesting.

A friend of mine and me tried something similar, but we ended up not publishing it, since the settings and parameters have great influence on the developing process in each converter.

I think it is the best way to try for yourself and then decide which performance and workflow you like best.
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS 50e, EOS 500, Spotmatic SPII, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;3.5/135;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: CZJ Flek 4/20; Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35; Summicron 2.0/50 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Zeiss 2.8/50; Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; MIR38 3.5/65; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bob955i



Level 3

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 1844
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
the settings and parameters have great influence on the developing process in each converter.


I found that too when comparing DPP with RSE - for some images DPP was the one, while for some others it was RSE.

Since then, I got C1LE bundled with a Sandisk memory card so I've got yet another converter to try out....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12691
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I find Lightroom's (which I own as former Rawshooter owner) performance to be below average, and I am surprised of how many people rate it the best in their judgements.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bob955i



Level 3

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 1844
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@ Orio: Did you find Rawshooter to be below par?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12691
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bob955i wrote:
@ Orio: Did you find Rawshooter to be below par?


No. I find Rawshooter the best of what I have tried. Of course I can relate this only to the cameras I own. However, Canon's own conversion generally still gives the best results in my opinion. Rawshooter is useful for when you need to convert images with a high dynamic range.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7849
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Due to workflow I prefer ACR to Canon's solution or Rawshooter. But you can get good results with each of these progs. I also like C1 (pretty similar to Rawshooter).
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS 50e, EOS 500, Spotmatic SPII, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;3.5/135;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: CZJ Flek 4/20; Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35; Summicron 2.0/50 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Zeiss 2.8/50; Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; MIR38 3.5/65; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bob955i



Level 3

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 1844
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have C1LE but haven't really used it as yet
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Photo Software and Digital Processing All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group