Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!
SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Pentor 100mm f/2.8: better than average?
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Home   Oversized Gallery
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:02 pm    Post subject: Pentor 100mm f/2.8: better than average? Reply with quote
1.


2.


3.


4.


5.


6.


PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Very good shoots can sell any lens to good, seriously , nice lens indeed!
Please show a picture from lens itself!


PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
better than average?

great series, great portraits, seems you master the 5D now


PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Thanks Attila & Poilu! Yeah, I'm getting to grips with the 5D. The only complaint is still that my photos are nicer when reviewing on my PC than on the camera itself. Just like the old times: you never know what you'll get until you get home! Laughing

The lens itself:





PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Do you have any idea from maker ? I saw Porst lenses in similar finish, everybody guess always Tomioka Laughing Laughing


PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I'm still unsure about the maker. This is an interesting topic though:

http://forum.mflenses.com/chinonflex-100mm-f-2-8-in-m42-mount-t18348.html


PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Hi Peter!
I don't know if it's "better than average" but it's for sure good enough Very Happy ...My fav is the 3rnd one, very well done but the portraits are also lovely!


PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Thanks Pascal! Wink


PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
What to say,
Are You beleave now that 83mm Takumar doesn't mean anything if you are to make a good photo (it has only collectable overvalue).
Yours last beautifull photos confirm that THE HEAD makes the photo,
not a camera.
Congratulations Peter!

Ir semso


PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Peter: Were your pictures taken with a FF camera?


PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Peter, you're not a useful tester: whatever lens you test, it looks like the best lens in the market Laughing


PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Peter - Great pics.

I think the lens looks a lot like my Chinon 200/3.5. Maybe Tomioka?


PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
woodrim wrote:
Peter: Were your pictures taken with a FF camera?


Yes! As always the EXIF in my pictures is intact; so you can see which camera I have used (the 5D MkI). Maybe an EXIF plugin for your browser is a good idea?

Orio wrote:
Peter, you're not a useful tester: whatever lens you test, it looks like the best lens in the market


This is becoming a running gag on this forum Laughing

Martinsmith99 wrote:

I think the lens looks a lot like my Chinon 200/3.5. Maybe Tomioka?


Maybe, maybe not. But for me it's most important how it performs. I did forget that the diaphragm of this lens is still stuck wide open, so all shots were made wide open Cool Cool


PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Spotmatic wrote:
woodrim wrote:
Peter: Were your pictures taken with a FF camera?


Yes! As always the EXIF in my pictures is intact; so you can see which camera I have used (the 5D MkI). Maybe an EXIF plugin for your browser is a good idea?


Can you recommend one? Are they free?


PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Firefox have free exif extension.
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Home   Oversized Gallery
Page 1 of 1