View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 7:56 pm Post subject: Pentax SMC Macro Takumar 100mm f4 WO. |
|
|
kryss wrote:
On a7ii.....click for large.
_________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2927 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
is it the m42 version? That is the one I have and it is excellent. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2018 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Many thanks,mine is PK mount.. _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2927 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Looks really good. As I understand it, the optics didn't change with the mount on this? _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
The way I see it, it doesn't matter if the optical formula changed with the mount or not. I also own the M42 version and it is an incredible lens. At least as good as this one. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
M42 & PK versions share optical formula, a true heliar.
If the formulas were different surely the differences would produce different results under some conditions. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Thanks Guy's,today I will shoot Canon FD 100mm f4 WO for comparison... _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2018 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I also own the Canon FD 100mm f/4, as well as the SMC Pentax 100 macro. One day a couple years ago, we had a bunch of flowers in bloom, so I dragged out most of my macro lenses to take pictures of them, including the Canon and Pentax. Honestly, I couldn't tell the difference between the two. I have examples, but on another computer. When I get to it, I'll post some. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2018 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Canon 100mm f4 macro. not much difference from Pentax.
_________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16541 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
nice ones from well known performers! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Thanks Klaus.. _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Okay I'm finally at the other computer where the images are stored. Here are several pairs of shots I took with both lenses one afternoon. As you can see, both lenses did a great job. The camera was my NEX 7, set to ISO 100. I used a tripod as well.
SMC Tak 100:
Canon FD 100:
SMC Tak 100:
Canon FD 100:
SMC Tak 100:
Canon FD 100:
See what I mean? It's a toss-up. They're both outstanding macro lenses.' I have more comparisons, but I think this is sufficient. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Very nice Michael,I agree, even I would say.Maybe the Pentax is lighter in weight? _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eno789
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 159 Location: California
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eno789 wrote:
Asahi S-M-C Macro-Takumar 100mm ƒ/4 (m42), Sony A7
_DSC2607 by Brian Zhou, on Flickr
_DSC2584 by Brian Zhou, on Flickr
_DSC2624 by Brian Zhou, on Flickr
_DSC2608 by Brian Zhou, on Flickr
_DSC2616 by Brian Zhou, on Flickr _________________ Sharpness from lenses; Softness from me.
Nikon DSLR, Sony Mirrorless, Panasonic mu-4/3 - Having fun with MF lenses
https://www.flickr.com/groups/painterly_bokeh |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2927 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Very nice eno. I especially like the blue iris. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Had one, sold it. Should have kept it - as above posts illustrate very well. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eno789
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 159 Location: California
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
eno789 wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
Very nice eno. I especially like the blue iris. |
Thanks jamaeolus. Fortunately the wide open glow in the background on that blue iris actually helped a little bit. _________________ Sharpness from lenses; Softness from me.
Nikon DSLR, Sony Mirrorless, Panasonic mu-4/3 - Having fun with MF lenses
https://www.flickr.com/groups/painterly_bokeh |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
kryss wrote: |
Very nice Michael,I agree, even I would say.Maybe the Pentax is lighter in weight? |
Yeah, I would say the SMC Tak is lighter than the Canon FD model. My SMC Tak 100 came with a metal hood as well, while my Canon didn't. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|