View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
rudolfkremers wrote: |
cooltouch wrote: |
An interesting thought experiment. When asked for a favorite lens, invariably I also think of a favorite camera that I would use it with. And if I were limited to just a single lens, I would want one that has proven itself to me to be a winner in a variety of settings. And what I keep coming up with is not just a lens. It is a camera. Simply because the lens in this camera is not interchangeable.
So, it would be a Zeiss Super Ikonta B with the coated 80mm f/2.8 Opton Tessar in a Synchro Compur shutter. My favorite Pocket Hasselblad.
I prefer the square format of the "B" because I don't have to worry about recomposing for verticals and I don't have to think about cropping unless I really want to -- I like square photos. |
I have this camera and lens in very good condition. I've been too time limited to try it out though. Your pics are very encouraging I must say.
Are they hard to learn to use well? What film do you use? |
Sorry, I missed your response. No, the Super Ikonta is not hard to learn how to use. It typically has a very good rangefinder, part of which rests on the lens standard and part of which is internal to the camera. The only thing I'd recommend that you make sure works properly is for the lens's focusing ring to turn smoothly. Sometimes, with the advancement of age, the grease in the helicals can become the consisitency of wax and will need to be replaced. The Super Ikonta BX (which I've owned) comes with a selinium cell meter, which may or may not work. I've owned a BX and its meter didn't work. Not a problem, I just carry a good quality hand-held light meter when I've been out and about with that camera.
As for film, I've used most any medium format film I can get my hands on. Tri-X and Fujichrome Provia are two of my favorites. I also like Kodak Portra a lot. I prefer Portra 160, but 400 is excellent as well. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
barryreid
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 285 Location: London
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
barryreid wrote:
If I had to pick one fixed prime lens it would be my Canon TS-E 24mm, which is an awesome lens. I'd like to be able to pack a 1.4x Extender with it too, but I guess that's not allowed... _________________ Canon + Contax + Minolta + Nikon + Olympus + Pentax + Yashica = Adaptall-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rudolfkremers
Joined: 10 Jun 2014 Posts: 723 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2015-08-08
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rudolfkremers wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
rudolfkremers wrote: |
cooltouch wrote: |
An interesting thought experiment. When asked for a favorite lens, invariably I also think of a favorite camera that I would use it with. And if I were limited to just a single lens, I would want one that has proven itself to me to be a winner in a variety of settings. And what I keep coming up with is not just a lens. It is a camera. Simply because the lens in this camera is not interchangeable.
So, it would be a Zeiss Super Ikonta B with the coated 80mm f/2.8 Opton Tessar in a Synchro Compur shutter. My favorite Pocket Hasselblad.
I prefer the square format of the "B" because I don't have to worry about recomposing for verticals and I don't have to think about cropping unless I really want to -- I like square photos. |
I have this camera and lens in very good condition. I've been too time limited to try it out though. Your pics are very encouraging I must say.
Are they hard to learn to use well? What film do you use? |
Sorry, I missed your response. No, the Super Ikonta is not hard to learn how to use. It typically has a very good rangefinder, part of which rests on the lens standard and part of which is internal to the camera. The only thing I'd recommend that you make sure works properly is for the lens's focusing ring to turn smoothly. Sometimes, with the advancement of age, the grease in the helicals can become the consisitency of wax and will need to be replaced. The Super Ikonta BX (which I've owned) comes with a selinium cell meter, which may or may not work. I've owned a BX and its meter didn't work. Not a problem, I just carry a good quality hand-held light meter when I've been out and about with that camera.
As for film, I've used most any medium format film I can get my hands on. Tri-X and Fujichrome Provia are two of my favorites. I also like Kodak Portra a lot. I prefer Portra 160, but 400 is excellent as well. |
I should get the camera back from the repair shop next week or so. Pretty excited and bought some portrait 400 in anticipation _________________ https://www.rudolfkremers.com
https://www.flickr.com/photos/rudolfkremers/
https://www.facebook.com/rudolf.kremers
https://www.omni-labs.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
barryreid wrote: |
If I had to pick one fixed prime lens it would be my Canon TS-E 24mm, which is an awesome lens. I'd like to be able to pack a 1.4x Extender with it too, but I guess that's not allowed... |
Why not? This is all just a mind game anyway. Besides, a teleconverter is not unlike a filter to a lens -- it's not a standalone lens, just a supplement to one.
rudolfkremers wrote: |
cooltouch wrote: |
An interesting thought experiment. When asked for a favorite lens, invariably I also think of a favorite camera that I would use it with. And if I were limited to just a single lens, I would want one that has proven itself to me to be a winner in a variety of settings. And what I keep coming up with is not just a lens. It is a camera. Simply because the lens in this camera is not interchangeable.
So, it would be a Zeiss Super Ikonta B with the coated 80mm f/2.8 Opton Tessar in a Synchro Compur shutter. My favorite Pocket Hasselblad. |
I should get the camera back from the repair shop next week or so. Pretty excited and bought some portrait 400 in anticipation |
Wait till you see the photos that Super Ikonta provides. It's a great camera. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vroger
Joined: 23 Jul 2014 Posts: 623 Location: MN
Expire: 2016-10-21
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
vroger wrote:
Sigma 200-500mm F2.8 APO EX DG ? http://www.sigmaphoto.com/product/200-500mm-f28-apo-ex-dg
found at jsmoral.com
:0) _________________ Roger Lund
Canon EOS-M, Fuji X-E2, Helois 44-0 Vintage, Helois 44-4, Canon FD 50mm 1.8, Jupiter 8 50mm F2, Jupiter 3 50mm F1.5, Canon Serenar 50mm 1.9, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM, Canon Serenar 85mm F2, Leica 50mm f2 summar, E.Ludwig 50mm F2.9, Rekagon will.wetzlar 50mm 2.8,, a.schacht ulm travenar 135mm F3.5, CZJ 29mm 2.8 Hoya 28mm 2.8, CZ Tessar 50mm 2.8, MIR 37mm. 2.8, Porst Color Reflex MC 50mm 1.7, Vivitar 28mm 2.8 mc cf
http://photography.rogerlund.net
For sale: Canon EOS-M and MF Adapters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vroger
Joined: 23 Jul 2014 Posts: 623 Location: MN
Expire: 2016-10-21
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
vroger wrote:
In terms.... of something that is actually good. lol.
As cool as a Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM is ......... Or even the canon 200mm 1.8..
The Carl Zeiss' 50mm Planar f/0.70? hmm
I would love to have the Canon S-type 50mm f/0.95... or the Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/.95. if I had to pick. _________________ Roger Lund
Canon EOS-M, Fuji X-E2, Helois 44-0 Vintage, Helois 44-4, Canon FD 50mm 1.8, Jupiter 8 50mm F2, Jupiter 3 50mm F1.5, Canon Serenar 50mm 1.9, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM, Canon Serenar 85mm F2, Leica 50mm f2 summar, E.Ludwig 50mm F2.9, Rekagon will.wetzlar 50mm 2.8,, a.schacht ulm travenar 135mm F3.5, CZJ 29mm 2.8 Hoya 28mm 2.8, CZ Tessar 50mm 2.8, MIR 37mm. 2.8, Porst Color Reflex MC 50mm 1.7, Vivitar 28mm 2.8 mc cf
http://photography.rogerlund.net
For sale: Canon EOS-M and MF Adapters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011 Posts: 800 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
Nordentro wrote: |
perhaps Distagon 35mm 1.4 |
this would be my choice too _________________ Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
vroger wrote: |
In terms.... of something that is actually good. lol.
As cool as a Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM is ......... Or even the canon 200mm 1.8..
The Carl Zeiss' 50mm Planar f/0.70? hmm
I would love to have the Canon S-type 50mm f/0.95... or the Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/.95. if I had to pick. |
Yup, those are all primo fast lenses. Also the Canon 85mm f/1.2 SSC Aspherical and later L series.
You know, that Sigma zoom reminds me of another old Canon classic that is pretty rare these days: the FD 150-600mm f/5.6. Not nearly as fast as the Sigma, but it was the first super-zoom of this type, far as I know. I remember seeing all those Canon ads in National Geographic magazine back in the 1980s, where this lens was displayed. Back then, the lens could be bought for a few thousand bucks. Now, its value is up there with that Sigma's, if not higher. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|