Home
SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Olympus Trip AF 31 - Fuji Superia 200
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:41 pm    Post subject: Olympus Trip AF 31 - Fuji Superia 200 Reply with quote

Crapy film and entry level film camera so don't expect much...

I couldn't make better pictures with fine lenses + SLR camera with this film.







PostPosted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

****I couldn't make better pictures with fine lenses + SLR camera with this film.****

...........................maybe your scanner isn't working properly?


PostPosted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Excalibur wrote:
****I couldn't make better pictures with fine lenses + SLR camera with this film.****

...........................maybe your scanner isn't working properly?


My scanner is fine, no problem. Fuji Superia 200 produce crap result. One of the worst film what I used.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

***One of the worst film what I used.***

Horses for courses..............it's a great general purpose film, so what film can improve this ordinary shot of a house?

Fuji superior 200, Canon 28mm
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/img396.jpg


PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Excalibur wrote:
***One of the worst film what I used.***

Horses for courses..............it's a great general purpose film, so what film can improve this ordinary shot of a house?

Fuji superior 200, Canon 28mm
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/img396.jpg


I got better result virtually with any film even cheap no name films, than superia 200.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't blame you using cheap film to test a camera, but it is almost a crime
to take a picture of your wife with such film. Laughing I've yet to try the plasticky
Exakta P&S (maybe POS, HA!) and will probably use Memories 200 film.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 6:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:


I got better result virtually with any film even cheap no name films, than superia 200.


But you couldn't win an argument against superior 200asa, just because if I and every member (who liked superia) kept posting shots........you are going to like a photo eventually and then have to admit that the photographer can use superia 200 asa and get better results than you.

All superia 200asa with different lenses:-

Vivitar 28mm:-
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/Photo12_11.jpg

pentax 35mm f3.5 m42
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/Pentax35mmf3-5M42.jpg

testing out my SP Tamron 35-80mm
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/Photo10_9.jpg

Konica 40mm
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/wedscenery3.jpg

My first attempt at low light and night shots in colour, canon 28mm
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/IMG073-1.jpg
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/sunset2.jpg

Have I failed to convince you that at least Superia 200 has something going for it, as a general purpose film?


PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Katastrofo wrote:
I can't blame you using cheap film to test a camera, but it is almost a crime
to take a picture of your wife with such film. Laughing I've yet to try the plasticky
Exakta P&S (maybe POS, HA!) and will probably use Memories 200 film.


Smile Memories 200 a good film I saw your result.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Excalibur wrote:
Attila wrote:


I got better result virtually with any film even cheap no name films, than superia 200.


But you couldn't win an argument against superior 200asa, just because if I and every member (who liked superia) kept posting shots........you are going to like a photo eventually and then have to admit that the photographer can use superia 200 asa and get better results than you.

All superia 200asa with different lenses:-

Vivitar 28mm:-
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/Photo12_11.jpg

pentax 35mm f3.5 m42
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/Pentax35mmf3-5M42.jpg

testing out my SP Tamron 35-80mm
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/Photo10_9.jpg

Konica 40mm
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/wedscenery3.jpg

My first attempt at low light and night shots in colour, canon 28mm
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/IMG073-1.jpg
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/sunset2.jpg

Have I failed to convince you that at least Superia 200 has something going for it, as a general purpose film?


Your result is nice no trouble at all with Superia 200.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fuji 100asa can be pretty as well:-

http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/canon28.jpg
Canon 28mm FD bayonet

Greens are good in this test shot
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/chris779.jpg


PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila, do you make any sharpening of your scanning?

Τhe colors seem enough good to me.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

magnet-2009 wrote:
Attila, do you make any sharpening of your scanning?

Τhe colors seem enough good to me.


No extra sharpening I did use same setting as usual on my other pictures.

I did try 2x I got always shitty result, so I never try more. Samples sent by Excalibur shows good value. Perhaps my rolls wasn't good stored in hot environment before I took it. Perhaps labs wasn't good any of them possible.

I will try to avoid from this film in future and use those what I like better and produce better result for me.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are right. I tried to make a fast tuning but without good results. There is no information [ refer to the Jesito's boat photo] to work with.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

magnet-2009 wrote:
You are right. I tried to make a fast tuning but without good results. There is no information [ refer to the Jesito's boat photo] to work with.


Thanks ! If something really crappy like this series, hard to make it better or impossible.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like the two first pictures, due to th link with the sitting people Very Happy

now about the Superia 200, i like this film and manage to have decent results, most of pictures i posted here are done with this film. i mean its not a crap film, at least for me. ok there are betters but for the price and results its a very good compromise.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hexi wrote:
I like the two first pictures, due to th link with the sitting people Very Happy

now about the Superia 200, i like this film and manage to have decent results, most of pictures i posted here are done with this film. i mean its not a crap film, at least for me. ok there are betters but for the price and results its a very good compromise.



Try to take pro film expired cold stored, same price far better result.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I will, but for now i've took the easiest film in order to try developing in C41 and have regular results, which is the case. I have 3 rolls left, and 3 of Kodak Supra 400 in 12poses

i plan to try Agfa Vista next , saw a very good offer on ebay, i think that i posted the link.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hexi wrote:
I will, but for now i've took the easiest film in order to try developing in C41 and have regular results, which is the case. I have 3 rolls left, and 3 of Kodak Supra 400 in 12poses

i plan to try Agfa Vista next , saw a very good offer on ebay, i think that i posted the link.


Well my fuji 200 asa was out of date and I bought 100 rolls for 32, and nowadays cant resist picking up Kodak gold etc at boot sales for 10p each.