| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bratboy_y2k
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:51 pm Post subject: not a repair question....camera film advance... |
|
|
bratboy_y2k wrote:
Hey there, I was just curious about mechanical and electronic film advance mechanisms in film cameras. Can anyone enlighten me on how they work? Specifically what decides the advance length? Thank you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peterqd
 Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 8068 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
A 135 film has notches (or holes) which engage on the teeth of a sprocket roller. One wind of the lever turns the roller and the film is
advanced by exactly 8 notches, which is a standard number for one 36mm wide frame on all films. Cameras designed for taking half
frame pictures advance the film only 4 notches per frame.
120 Medium format film has no notches. On earlier cameras the film was advanced by hand roller, lining up printed numbers on the film
backing paper with a small window in the camera back. More modern cameras advance the film automatically by one turn of the lever. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gardener
 Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
It's just pure mechanics - typically there's a circular piece with a notch that is connected to winder shaft. At the end of the wind notch hits a stopper and blocks further movement. Releasing shutter will also unlock the stopper and allow next wind cycle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bratboy_y2k
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bratboy_y2k wrote:
I totally get the perforation count and advancement. I'm really curious if it would be a big deal to make a modification so that it only advances half the frame as in a half frame camera. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lloydy
 Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7768 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
The shutter opens for the full frame, you would have all sorts of problems with blanking half the frame, and depending on the type of shutter - the direction it moves etc - would the exposure be compromised? _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gardener
 Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
It would be easier to acquire a quality half-frame camera, like Pen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kansalliskalaCafe
 Joined: 23 Jul 2015 Posts: 602 Location: South Finland, countryside
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskalaCafe wrote:
| peterqd wrote: |
120 Medium format film has no notches. On earlier cameras the film was advanced by hand roller, lining up printed numbers on the film
backing paper with a small window in the camera back. More modern cameras advance the film automatically by one turn of the lever. |
Usually(?) there is a small roller with tiny teeth that follows the outer paper of the film. When this roller has turned specific amount of rotations, the mechamism stops. _________________ (my normal account password still on another computer) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bratboy_y2k
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bratboy_y2k wrote:
There shouldn't be an issue with the shutter system and exposure. A camera would be doing the same thing with a full or half frame. I'm looking at one thing at a time. Film advance first, and wondering how the electronic advance works. Is there a mechanical sensor or is it a servo? I have no idea. I have thoughts on how to blank off half the frame but if the 4 perf pull is impossible I won't even look at the rest. I'm looking at the Pen FT's but I like the idea of a modern half frame and after dealing with cine cameras and seeing them modded I was just wondering about a 35mm... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gardener
 Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
A. You do realize that film is not pulled by perforations, right? They are more like guides/stays. The mechanics that determine length of the advance are under the bottom cover.
B. You need to advance a full frame to cock the shutter. You can bypass that manually if the camera has double exposure button, but modding the camera to make that automatic? You'd have to have some serious mechanical engineering skills to design the parts, and a place to manufacture them.
C. You'd need a camera with vertically traveling shutter, otherwise your exposure times will be messed up.
D. You'd need to design an efficient system to block the light from the other half of the frame.
Actually, here is what you can do. Get a good film SLR with proper shutter - something like FM or FA. Block half of the frame. Carefully measure how far you need to move the arm to advance half the frame. Put a stopper in the top cover that would not let the arm move past the desired point. Then your your shooting would be like this - advance, press double exposure button, cock shutter, fire. You can probably do a second mod, to make double exposure button always on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10362 Location: California
Expire: 2021-06-22
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| bratboy_y2k wrote: |
| There shouldn't be an issue with the shutter system and exposure. A camera would be doing the same thing with a full or half frame. I'm looking at one thing at a time. Film advance first, and wondering how the electronic advance works. Is there a mechanical sensor or is it a servo? I have no idea. I have thoughts on how to blank off half the frame but if the 4 perf pull is impossible I won't even look at the rest. I'm looking at the Pen FT's but I like the idea of a modern half frame and after dealing with cine cameras and seeing them modded I was just wondering about a 35mm... |
After shutter completion, film advances, prior to next shutter cycle...
Depending on mechanics, a wheel that turns one turn could be replaced with a wheel 1/2 the diameter, for example.
Depending on electro-mechanics, a camera with a processor might be modified with a software hack, or the mechanical mod may work.
Why the bother? What is the result? The result is worth it? _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony A7Rii, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses:
Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200
Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300
Macro-Takumar 1:4/50
Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm
Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element),
Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100
Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100
SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
Other lenses:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bratboy_y2k
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
bratboy_y2k wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
| bratboy_y2k wrote: |
| There shouldn't be an issue with the shutter system and exposure. A camera would be doing the same thing with a full or half frame. I'm looking at one thing at a time. Film advance first, and wondering how the electronic advance works. Is there a mechanical sensor or is it a servo? I have no idea. I have thoughts on how to blank off half the frame but if the 4 perf pull is impossible I won't even look at the rest. I'm looking at the Pen FT's but I like the idea of a modern half frame and after dealing with cine cameras and seeing them modded I was just wondering about a 35mm... |
After shutter completion, film advances, prior to next shutter cycle...
Depending on mechanics, a wheel that turns one turn could be replaced with a wheel 1/2 the diameter, for example.
Depending on electro-mechanics, a camera with a processor might be modified with a software hack, or the mechanical mod may work.
Why the bother? What is the result? The result is worth it? |
If someone wants to much around, and it works, absolutely! For the same reason people do crazy assed stuff on hackaday all the time! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lloydy
 Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7768 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Sat here messing with two cameras, an old Zenit with cloth shutter and a Chinon CE-5 with metal leaf shutter.
The Zenit has two curtains moving sideways in line with the film, designed to give the right aperture / speed by both curtains acting as one to give an image circle that is centred.
The Chinon's metal leaf shutter works in a vertical plane - right angles to the film - but again has two leaves that work in unison and gives a central image circle.
As shutter speeds increase the closer the two shutters are together, effectively a thin strip moving across the film plane, but in different directions for each camera.
Any blanking of the image circle would surely have to be done equally on each side of the center? If so, then the time the curtain / shutter travels past the blanked off section would be lost time, which would require adjustment to achieve a correct exposure time?
or am I overthinking this?  _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peterqd
 Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 8068 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
| Gardener wrote: |
| A. You do realize that film is not pulled by perforations, right? They are more like guides/stays. |
Can you enlarge on that? I don't understand what else could transport the film if it's not the sprocket roller and perforations.
The film cannot be pulled by the take-up roller, as this has a slipping clutch to allow for the increase in diameter as more film is wound on.
To transport only half a frame it might be possible to file off half the teeth on the sprocket roller so that the film remains static whilst the
roller completes the rest of its rotation for every wind of the lever. I have no idea whether this is feasible. The only other way would be
to change the gear ratio in the transport mechansim so that the roller revolves more slowly - 0.75 revolutions per frame instead of 1.5.
Either way would preserve the double wind and double exposure lock mechanism.
I don't foresee any problems with either a vertical or a horizontal focal plane shutter, and it would be quite simple to blank off half the
image area with tape to avoid overlapping images. The main problem I see is that the taken image will only be half what you see in the
viewfinder and the orientation would be at 90°, i.e. portrait becomes landscape and vice versa. _________________ Peter - Moderator
Last edited by peterqd on Sat Jan 30, 2016 2:09 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gerald
 Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
Maybe the best reference on shutters is the book "Photography - Theory and Practice" by J.R. Clerc.:
https://ia601403.us.archive.org/6/items/PhotographyTheoryAndPractice/aa001.pdf
Shutters are in chapter XII _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gardener
 Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
| Lloydy wrote: |
Any blanking of the image circle would surely have to be done equally on each side of the center? If so, then the time the curtain / shutter travels past the blanked off section would be lost time, which would require adjustment to achieve a correct exposure time?
or am I overthinking this?  |
My thinking is that in either case you have an imager that is illuminated through a slit created by two moving curtains. As long as the length of this opening is smaller than the dimension of the image perpendicular to its movement the exposure time will be correct. So on metal shutter, exposure will be fine, and on cloth shutter slow speeds will be messed up. If you are interested, I can find a moment and try to time it.
But your mentioning the image circle got me thinking - yes, we can probably mod a camera to use half of a frame, but what of IQ? A user would be forced to use closed aperture at all times, or he will get wild variations in sharpness over the frame. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gardener
 Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
| peterqd wrote: |
| Gardener wrote: |
| A. You do realize that film is not pulled by perforations, right? They are more like guides/stays. |
Can you enlarge on that? I don't understand what else could transport the film if it's not the sprocket roller and perforations.
The film cannot be pulled by the take-up roller, as this has a slipping clutch to allow for the increase in diameter as more film is wound on.
. |
I agree - I was wrong on that part. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lloydy
 Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7768 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
| Gardener wrote: |
| Lloydy wrote: |
Any blanking of the image circle would surely have to be done equally on each side of the center? If so, then the time the curtain / shutter travels past the blanked off section would be lost time, which would require adjustment to achieve a correct exposure time?
or am I overthinking this?  |
My thinking is that in either case you have an imager that is illuminated through a slit created by two moving curtains. As long as the length of this opening is smaller than the dimension of the image perpendicular to its movement the exposure time will be correct. So on metal shutter, exposure will be fine, and on cloth shutter slow speeds will be messed up. If you are interested, I can find a moment and try to time it.
But your mentioning the image circle got me thinking - yes, we can probably mod a camera to use half of a frame, but what of IQ? A user would be forced to use closed aperture at all times, or he will get wild variations in sharpness over the frame. |
I agree, and think the best method would be to use a horizontal, metal leaf shutter camera, and blank off 1/4 of the frame each side of the film plane opening, then find some way of modifying the film transport to work accordingly. At least the lens is central to the 1/2 frame, and the speeds would still be correct as they would correspond to the only original dimension of the film frame - the vertical one, whereas the horizontal cloth shutter would be working with 1/2 the distance of the original frame. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bratboy_y2k
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bratboy_y2k wrote:
| Gardener wrote: |
| Lloydy wrote: |
Any blanking of the image circle would surely have to be done equally on each side of the center? If so, then the time the curtain / shutter travels past the blanked off section would be lost time, which would require adjustment to achieve a correct exposure time?
or am I overthinking this?  |
My thinking is that in either case you have an imager that is illuminated through a slit created by two moving curtains. As long as the length of this opening is smaller than the dimension of the image perpendicular to its movement the exposure time will be correct. So on metal shutter, exposure will be fine, and on cloth shutter slow speeds will be messed up. If you are interested, I can find a moment and try to time it.
But your mentioning the image circle got me thinking - yes, we can probably mod a camera to use half of a frame, but what of IQ? A user would be forced to use closed aperture at all times, or he will get wild variations in sharpness over the frame. |
The imaging area would have to be blanked 2 perfs on each side. The shutter would defiantly be traveling over the blanked area to actually get to the exposing area and this would be lost time but who cares right? I'm so not an expert but learning what I can. I would have thought that most modern cameras were metal shutters. I don't think there would be any issues with sharpness lost because it would be like enlarging the middle half of a negative.
I get that the orientation would be reversed like in an Olympus Pen FT where landscape means turning the camera 90 degrees. No biggie, it would be cool.
I thought the hardest part would be blanking the frame out. I thought tape might work but would wondered how to keep it taught and placed right so you don't get fuzzy overlapping edges. Marking the viewfinder would be simple. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gardener
 Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
| bratboy_y2k wrote: |
| I thought the hardest part would be blanking the frame out. I thought tape might work but would wondered how to keep it taught and placed right so you don't get fuzzy overlapping edges. Marking the viewfinder would be simple. |
You'd find a piece of thin black plastic, cut the hole of the appropriate size and then glue it in in the mirror box. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bratboy_y2k
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
bratboy_y2k wrote:
| Gardener wrote: |
| bratboy_y2k wrote: |
| I thought the hardest part would be blanking the frame out. I thought tape might work but would wondered how to keep it taught and placed right so you don't get fuzzy overlapping edges. Marking the viewfinder would be simple. |
You'd find a piece of thin black plastic, cut the hole of the appropriate size and then glue it in in the mirror box. |
That's what I was thinking but doesnt it really have to be super flat otherwise it will interfere with the film? Do you know what I mean? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peterqd
 Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 8068 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
If you think about how a focal plane shutter works, I hope you'll agree that it doesn't matter what frame size you have or where it is positioned.
The shutter has two curtains - the first which allows light through to the film/sensor and the second which blocks it again. The amount of
exposure time for any "pixel" on the film or sensor, wherever it is within the frame, is determined by the time between the first and
second curtains.
Obviously both curtains need to travel at a constant speed across the frame to obtain an even exposure, and this speed remains constant
whatever exposure time is selected. The exposure time is adjusted, not by the travel speed of the shutter curtains, but by altering the
width of the gap between the curtains, i.e. the time between when the first curtain opens and the second curtain closes. For slow
exposures the gap is actually wider than the frame itself, so it appears that the shutter opens fully for a short time. For faster speeds the
gap is smaller than the frame width, so it appears that a slit moves across the frame. However the important point to understand is that,
whatever exposure time is selected, every "pixel" within the frame receives the same amount of exposure time, but not all at the same
instant. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gerald
 Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
In fact, the curtain speed doesn't need to be constant. A real curtain comes out of immobility and its speed increases continuously as it runs through the focal plane. For the exposure to be uniform, it is the necessary and sufficient that the graphs of distances traveled versus time for both curtains be parallel (a shift in time, or a delay) as shown below. In a well adjusted shutter, the size of red segments, which give the exposure time, is constant, but the size of green segments, which give the width of the slit between curtains, increases continuously.
 _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist.
Last edited by Gerald on Sun Jan 31, 2016 5:39 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gardener
 Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
| bratboy_y2k wrote: |
| Gardener wrote: |
| bratboy_y2k wrote: |
| I thought the hardest part would be blanking the frame out. I thought tape might work but would wondered how to keep it taught and placed right so you don't get fuzzy overlapping edges. Marking the viewfinder would be simple. |
You'd find a piece of thin black plastic, cut the hole of the appropriate size and then glue it in in the mirror box. |
That's what I was thinking but doesnt it really have to be super flat otherwise it will interfere with the film? Do you know what I mean? |
You are going to put at back of mirror box, not in the film chamber. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peterqd
 Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 8068 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
| Gerald wrote: |
| In fact, the curtain speed doesn't need to be constant. A real curtain comes out of immobility and its speed increases continuously as it runs through the focal plane. For the exposure to be uniform, it is the necessary and sufficient that the graphs of distances traveled versus time for both curtains be parallel (a shift in time, or a delay) as shown below. In a well adjusted shutter, the size of green segments, which give the exposure time, are constant, but the size of red segments, which give the width of the slit between curtains, increase continuously. |
Totally agree - I just didn't want to make it that complicated.
I think you have the colours confused though - on your graph the exposure time is in red and the slit width is green. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gerald
 Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
| peterqd wrote: |
| I think you have the colours confused though - on your graph the exposure time is in red and the slit width is green. |
I don't know if I got it right. Do the colors I chose have a special meaning? Or do you think I've made a mistake? _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|