View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 406 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 10:17 am Post subject: Nikon Repro Nikkor 85mm f1.0 |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
Here's an interesting beastie, an symmetrical industrial lens with 12 elements in 8 groups, used for highest quality 1:1 reproductions. Unfortunately because of the short flange distance, it is not possible to shoot at much lower magnifications, but for me it has a wonderful look shot wide open.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
_________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 516
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
Very interesting. My JML 64mm f0.85 is another example of a superfast lens optically designed for closeups only (whilst not perfectly symmetrical).
I did think that depth of field of macro lenses was sufficiently thin anyway, until I did a comparison and found a noticeable, useful benefit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2921 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Very nice artistic images 👍 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 406 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
eggplant wrote: |
Very interesting. My JML 64mm f0.85 is another example of a superfast lens optically designed for closeups only (whilst not perfectly symmetrical).
I did think that depth of field of macro lenses was sufficiently thin anyway, until I did a comparison and found a noticeable, useful benefit. |
The Nikkor is unique in that it can resolve 200 lp/mm, much higher than usual superfast lenses. I just posted some shots in the digital gallery shot with a FJW Industries 90mm f1.0 lens that covers MF and can be adapted to focus to infinity on mirrorless. Nice but nowhere near the resolution of the Nikkor. _________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 516
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
kymarto wrote: |
eggplant wrote: |
Very interesting. My JML 64mm f0.85 is another example of a superfast lens optically designed for closeups only (whilst not perfectly symmetrical).
I did think that depth of field of macro lenses was sufficiently thin anyway, until I did a comparison and found a noticeable, useful benefit. |
The Nikkor is unique in that it can resolve 200 lp/mm, much higher than usual superfast lenses. I just posted some shots in the digital gallery shot with a FJW Industries 90mm f1.0 lens that covers MF and can be adapted to focus to infinity on mirrorless. Nice but nowhere near the resolution of the Nikkor. |
I think I remember seeing some of the FJW, might've been yours- quite unique in the (considerably) long flange distance but I haven't tested out many 90mm 'X-Ray' lenses.
The issue with the 'Milky look' is people taking ones designed for infinity, and unit-focusing them at incredibly short distances they weren't designed for- a byproduct of the unachievably short flange distance.
If you look back the very fast 50 in a company's lens lineup would always have worse minimum focus capabilities.
...However much this makes sense, I am not sure if it really matters, or whether I should blame people for that expectation. At any rate these lenses were never designed for full frame coverage at infinity, so it is a good way to ward people off They will never get the shallow depth of field across a full frame.
I did see a test of a Rayxar on a Nikon Z on nikongear (now down?), focused on a bookcase a few meters away, and you could clearly see very nice sharpness in it's image circle.
As for your gallery photos, it is certainly a pretty stellar rendering, but I can't quite settle on the amount of optical vignetting in the shots shown (which should give us clue for coverage) - any more samples you could post? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 406 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
More shots like those I could post. Those shots are not corrected for vignetting, there is no falloff in the 35mm frame. I took the lens off and shifted it holding it next to the body, trying to determine the image circle. Itvs certainly larger than full frame, appears to be around 50-60mm. _________________ Vintage lens aficionado
Last edited by kymarto on Wed May 25, 2022 8:35 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16541 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
_________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3071 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3214 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
I guess everything is f/1 in those pictures.
Very difficult to nail the focus. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 516
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
kymarto wrote: |
More shots like those I could post. Those shots are not corrected for vignetting, there is no falloff in the 35mm frame. I took the lens off and shifted it holding it next to the body, trying to determine the image circle. Itvs certainly larger than full frame, appears to be around 50-60mm. |
Well that's interesting, and definitely worth posting some more. To be fair, the image circle will always look larger when wide open, usually given at f/16, but no aperture control... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|