 Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:05 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Orio wrote:
I once compared my CZJ Sonnar 2.8/200 with my Nikkor AI 4/200 and the Sonnar was much better. BUT - those comparisons are too dependant on the variations on the single copies. One should be able to test, say, three different copies of each lens model, pick the best ones of each and then compare, in order to reduce the impact of the copy variation factor.
I have verified now, with my experience, that even the best built lenses, like Leica's, do suffer from copy variations, although maybe not as dramatically as with cheaper brands.
Bottom line, whenever one compares lenses head to head, should always keep in mind that he's comparing individual copies and that copies may differ.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
