View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Razster
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 Posts: 101
|
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:53 am Post subject: Nikon Micro-Nikkor-P.C MF 55mm f/3.5 Non-AI (Samples) |
|
|
Razster wrote:
So I haggled my local Pawn shop down from $69.95 to $40.00.
I told the pawn shop owner that I have seen this lens sitting there for 6 months collecting dust, and showed him the $40 in my hand
Taken on my Canon 20D, with a Nikon adapter.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:15 pm Post subject: Micro Nikkor |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
$40 ? I should emigrate to wherever you live
Very nice find, and good pictures too - I like number 3 especially. _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
Excellent quality. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Razster
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 Posts: 101
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Razster wrote:
They have a Nikkor-UD AI 20mm for $40
I tested it on my camera and it is super tack on. Nothing wrong with it but some scratches on the body.
Glass is perfect. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Razster wrote: |
They have a Nikkor-UD AI 20mm for $40
I tested it on my camera and it is super tack on. Nothing wrong with it but some scratches on the body.
Glass is perfect. |
One of the best ultrawide what I ever had. Quiet rare common market price above 200 USD even if awful looking. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Razster
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 Posts: 101
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Razster wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Razster wrote: |
They have a Nikkor-UD AI 20mm for $40
I tested it on my camera and it is super tack on. Nothing wrong with it but some scratches on the body.
Glass is perfect. |
One of the best ultrawide what I ever had. Quiet rare common market price above 200 USD even if awful looking. |
I guess I should have bought that before the micro
It will be ok, I hid it behind some old CTV lenses they had.
They also have a 300mm Super Tak M42 for $50
Is it worth a look? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Razster wrote: |
Attila wrote: |
Razster wrote: |
They have a Nikkor-UD AI 20mm for $40
I tested it on my camera and it is super tack on. Nothing wrong with it but some scratches on the body.
Glass is perfect. |
One of the best ultrawide what I ever had. Quiet rare common market price above 200 USD even if awful looking. |
I guess I should have bought that before the micro
It will be ok, I hid it behind some old CTV lenses they had.
They also have a 300mm Super Tak M42 for $50
Is it worth a look? |
Micro is a great lens as you know already, 300mm Tak also. Market value is around 200 USD too . You must be leave on moon or in a rich American colony _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Razster
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 Posts: 101
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Razster wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Razster wrote: |
Attila wrote: |
Razster wrote: |
They have a Nikkor-UD AI 20mm for $40
I tested it on my camera and it is super tack on. Nothing wrong with it but some scratches on the body.
Glass is perfect. |
One of the best ultrawide what I ever had. Quiet rare common market price above 200 USD even if awful looking. |
I guess I should have bought that before the micro
It will be ok, I hid it behind some old CTV lenses they had.
They also have a 300mm Super Tak M42 for $50
Is it worth a look? |
Micro is a great lens as you know already, 300mm Tak also. Market value is around 200 USD too . You must be leave on moon or in a rich American colony |
Pawn/Loan shops my friend... They have baskets full of these lenses sitting in a locked cabinet collecting dust.
I was introduced to them yesterday by the woman who runs the shop - she said they have been there for years collecting dust and that she wants them out!
There are 100mm Nikon AF macro's for $50 with clean glass and a bunch of 28/105 nikons, 35/140's etc
I just don't have the time to sit and test them all.
I will be headed to Reno in order to explorer all the Pawn/Loan shops for lenses in a month
But I see these lenses all the time go for dirt cheap. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
I have a 1974 PC diamond grip version and could not understand why it did so well at infinity.
Supposedly the 55/2.8 shoots better at infinity than the 3.5--that's what I thought--In fact in my case the opposite is true--the 55/2.8 is better close in----but not better than the OLD ones.
centers 100% @ f/8
55/2.8:
below the 3.5 @ f/8
the 3.5 is a bit shorter and fatter: 237 grams 60USD
the 2.8: 291 grams 85USD
well according to bjorn and MIR there are at least 4 verisons of the 55/3.5 which have significant differences.
Mine has been reworked for good distance performance, while it is NOT as good for macro as the older ones.
the first F mount actually went 1:1 without a tube. That thing is worth some money very few made.
anyway, from MIR
"55mm f/3.5 Micro-Nikkor-P Auto
The first significant change in the physical appearance of Micro-Nikkor lenses may have been occurred between 1974-1975. It was in line with a common Nikkor lens updating program which covered many other lenses as well. The most distinguish difference is the focusing grip where a diamond-ridged design was adopted and a scalloped aperture was still retained. There are two scales for the reproduction ratio, one with the lens alone and another when an Extension Tube is used, were engraved on the distance ring. But above all, this lens has an entirely optical composition in a new 5 elements in 4 groups design instead of 5 elements in 3 groups design used on previous version"
This fact is utterly overlooked by nearly everyone--no mention in nikon tales, rockwell does not mention it, and far and wide a 55/3.5 is a 55/3.5 with only coatings and grips changing. _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 1922 Location: Slovenija
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
NikonD wrote:
my 55/2.8 is sharp at infinity AND at close-up even wide open |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10471 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
cograts Razster, nice samples, you find a bargain shop! _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BenediktW
Joined: 24 Jan 2008 Posts: 336 Location: Solingen, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BenediktW wrote:
The Pre-Ai 55mm Micro-Nikkor F3,5 is one of the best lenses I know, without any limitation and compared to the best lenses of all brands.
Ah, I almost forgot: The adress of this shop, please. I am just checking flights... _________________ http://www.1979fotographie.de/
Nikon D90, Sony NEX-3
AF-Nikkors 24mm F2,8, 35mm F1,8 DX, 85mm F1,8, 28-105mm F3,5-4,5D IF
Nikon MF: Nikkor 20mm F4, Nikkor 50mm F2 Ai, Micro-Nikkor-P 55mm F3,5, Nikkor 135mm F2,8 Ai, Nikkor 200mm F4
Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135mm F2,8 [for sale], Vario-Sonnar 80-200mm F4 T* (C/Y) with Leitax for Nikon-F
Minolta MD-Rokkors: 28mm F2,8, 45mm F2
M42 Lenses: Mamiya/Sekor SX 21mm F4, SX 28mm F2,8, SX 55mm F1,8, SX 135mm F2,8, 400mm F6,3 [for sale], Asahi-Pentax Super-Tak. 28mm F3,5 and 55mm F1,8, CZJ Tessar 50mm F2,8, Vivitar 135mm F2,8
Mamiya 645 Lenses: Mamiya Sekor C 80mm F2,8 N, 300mm F5,6, 105-210mm F4,5 ULD [for sale] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
indianadinos
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1310 Location: Toulouse, France
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
indianadinos wrote:
Razster wrote: |
Pawn/Loan shops my friend... They have baskets full of these lenses sitting in a locked cabinet collecting dust.
|
And what about feeding the LBA of the "poor" members of this forum sharing the address of the site (or, even better, the listing of the lenses and their prices) ?
BTW, the Micro-Nikkor 55/3.5 you found is a really fine lens, i currently use it on my K10D with a Nikon-to-M42 adapter ... _________________ Please visit my blogs Shooting with a Pentax K10D / FF Visions
Takumar: 24/3.5, 28/3.5, 35/2, 35/3.5, 50/1.4, 55/1.8, 85/1.8, 105/2.8, 120/2.8, 135/3.5, 150/4, 200/4
Pentax-K: M28/2.8, K28/3.5, M50/1.4, A50/1.7, M50/4 Macro, K85/1.8, K105/2.8, K135/2.5, M200/4, M70-150/4
Zeiss: Flektogon 20/2.8, 20/4, 35/2.4, 35/2.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Biotar 58/2, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer: Primagon 35/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Orestor 135/2.8
Schacht/Steinheil: Travenar 90/2.8, Travenon 135/4.5, Quinar 135/2.8, Quinar 135/3.5
Russian: MIR 37B, Industar 50/3.5, Helios 44M & 44M-2, Jupiter 37A
P6: Flektogon 50/4, Biometar 80/2.8, Orestor 300/4
Nikkor: Nikkor-O 35/2, Micro 55/3.5, Nikkor-S 50/1.4, Nikkor-Q 135/2.8
Fuji: EBC 28/3.5, EBC 55/3.5 Macro, EBC 135/2.5
Misc Lenses: Kiron 105/2.8 Macro, Tamron SP90/2.5
... and a few other Vivitar, Tamron, Sigma and Soligor lenses ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChromaticAberration
Joined: 23 Dec 2010 Posts: 819 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChromaticAberration wrote:
This rapidly became one of my fetish lenses but after looking at some macro M42 hardware, I doubt I will be investing in one of these. _________________ Body: Fujifilm X-E1
Landscapes: Samyang 12mm f/2 NCS CS
Macro: Vivitar Series 1 105mm ƒ/2.5
Portrait: Helios-44 58mm ƒ/2.0
Low-light: SMC Takumar 50mm ƒ/1.4
_________________
Marketplace feedback
_________________
a pнoтograpн ιѕ neιтнer тaĸen or ѕeιzed вy ғorce. ιт oғғerѕ ιтѕelғ υp. ιт ιѕ тнe pнoтo тнaт тaĸeѕ yoυ. one мυѕт noт тaĸe pнoтoѕ.” – нenrι carтιer-вreѕѕon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
BenediktW wrote: |
The Pre-Ai 55mm Micro-Nikkor F3,5 is one of the best lenses I know, without any limitation and compared to the best lenses of all brands.
Ah, I almost forgot: The adress of this shop, please. I am just checking flights... |
Which pre-AI 55/3.5?
There are basically five versions, and two formulas.
The original preset 1:1
The early non-comp
The compensating aperture version---best as macro--not good at infinity
The diamond grip: new formula--now great at infinity, not quite as good macro.
The diamond PC: now multicoated.
These are all pre-AI
Mine is the last mentioned, took it out tonite:
this version seems frankly superb at infinity
all handheld, most wide open
image of my version
http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/c5535.jpg
Again, Bjorn does not consider this one worth using professionally for macro work. _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kram
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1344 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kram wrote:
uhoh, yours looks like a great lens to me!
Do you know the history of the 55/2.8 Micro? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
Kram wrote: |
uhoh, yours looks like a great lens to me!
Do you know the history of the 55/2.8 Micro? |
just what I read here:
http://imaging.nikon.com/history/nikkor/26/index.htm
My understanding is there is only one version, one formula. Fantastic lens plauged by terrible choice of lubricants.
Bjorn had his cleaned three times and gave up.
Mine is now sticky
here some samples
now another infiinity shot and crop from the 55/3.5 PC
100%
crop is from upper right of original
to me it acutually looks slightly better than the 2.8, but anyway it's obviously no slouch at inifinity. _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kram
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1344 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kram wrote:
Thanks again uhoh! I love my 55/2.8 but am currently trying a Zeiss 60/2.8 which I feel is better. This is a bit of hair-splitting though as both are very good.
Last edited by Kram on Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arninetyes
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 312 Location: SoCal
Expire: 2013-03-26
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arninetyes wrote:
Enjoy it! It's a fabulous lens and an excellent bargain.
I have one of these gems, a compensating version. I got it from eBay, including the 1:1 ring, for $45. It's in excellent condition, with glass as clean as my recently serviced 25-50/4 Zoom Nikkor. I guess no one was watching ebay that day.
This is one of the lenses on my "must keep" list. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eno789
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 159 Location: California
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2016 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eno789 wrote:
I acquired a compensating type Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/3.5 recently. First walk with the lens, and I feel it's good at macro, mid-, and far distance.
Macro-distance by Brian Zhou, on Flickr
Mid-distance by Brian Zhou, on Flickr
Far-distance by Brian Zhou, on Flickr _________________ Sharpness from lenses; Softness from me.
Nikon DSLR, Sony Mirrorless, Panasonic mu-4/3 - Having fun with MF lenses
https://www.flickr.com/groups/painterly_bokeh |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Focusthrow
Joined: 12 Sep 2017 Posts: 209
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Focusthrow wrote:
Nice shots everyone. These were taken with a non-AI version of the 55mm Nikkor Micro: specifically, this is a “K” version. All shots were taken @ f/4 or f/5.6. Best jt
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
56 DIN
Joined: 24 Apr 2010 Posts: 1656 Location: Germany Erbach /ODW
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
56 DIN wrote:
are these model houses, or why did you use a micro Nikkor?
joke aside, it is still a great series of lenses these 55 Nikkors and your pics are showing it for one of them in a perfect way _________________ Thomas
NEX & manual lenses
Nikon & manual lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2927 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
_________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
About the house pictures, are you pressed up against a fence? Just wondering why we don't see the whole house...
It feels like it has this tension between an almost complete house, and a detail shot, I quite like them as they are. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Focusthrow
Joined: 12 Sep 2017 Posts: 209
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Focusthrow wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
About the house pictures, are you pressed up against a fence? Just wondering why we don't see the whole house...
It feels like it has this tension between an almost complete house, and a detail shot, I quite like them as they are. |
Your intuitions are good, sensing something restrictive, though “tension” might be replaced with a better word. That day, I had nothing wider than 55mm. So, while it varies from home to home, there were situations where backing up, (more), was not possible. Sometimes, I’m on the edge of the sidewalk, other times, backed into the street (not recommended btw) to get a particular composition: perhaps the tension you sense is my dodging cars while I’m trying to discern focus & grab the shot. LOL More seriously: the observations expressed in your comments are thought provoking & welcome.
But, where did you ever see any one shot where an entire home is encapsulated in the composition? Though your point, that an entirety of one side of the home is incomplete, is understood. However, this has the advantage of being ably to more fully fill the frame: there is a school of shooting which preaches always “Fill the frame!” Anyway, I strive to challenge myself & to not fall into limited ways of seeing the world--the net effect is to promote learning.
Here are a couple more with 55mm (on APS-c, so effectively 82.5mm) where freedom in which to move was not an issue--from the High Peaks region of New York & the Presidential range of New Hampshire, respectively. Best, jt
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|