| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PhantomLord
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 476
Location: Szczecin, Poland
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:10 pm Post subject: Near lake - OM10 - Zuiko 50/1.8 - Agfa Vista Plus 200 |
 |
|
PhantomLord wrote:
Hi,
A few photos taken with Olympus Zuiko 50mm f/1.8, Olympus OM10 and Agfa Vista Plus 200 (Poundland Film).
I really like this lens and the body and apart from setting exposure compensation which is painful, everything works great.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
Mateusz
_________________
Mateusz
No good story ever starts with drinking tea.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mateuszmolik/sets/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izvar
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Posts: 252
Location: Moldova
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
izvar wrote:
Nice images, very good colors, reminds me of Fuji
_________________
“The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat.”
― Confucius |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PhantomLord
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 476
Location: Szczecin, Poland
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PhantomLord wrote:
It's believed that this new Agfa Vista Plus 200 is in fact made by Fuji and is the same as Fuji c200. I really like this film a lot. It's cheap but still delivers very nice photos and as you said Fuji colours.
Mateusz
_________________
Mateusz
No good story ever starts with drinking tea.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mateuszmolik/sets/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5019
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Well you certainly know how to get the best results from Vista + ISO 200 ...well done
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skida
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 1826
Location: North East England
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skida wrote:
| Excalibur wrote: |
| Well you certainly know how to get the best results from Vista + ISO 200 ...well done |
+1
Lovely results.
_________________
Lots of 35mm Film Cameras
Lots of Lenses
New Vlog on Youtube called "The Olduns Shot"
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBHCOHaIrcYr7s3is1EcqxQ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PhantomLord
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 476
Location: Szczecin, Poland
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
PhantomLord wrote:
Thank you, it means a lot coming from you guys.
What I don't know how to handle is Kodak Gold 200. I'm getting very badly results from this negative. I rated it at ISO 160 like I do with most 200 negatives, but people faces look terrible on Kodak Gold and I don't know why. Now I'm trying rating it at different speeds and shooting in very particular conditions to find out what I could do wrong. I remember that my father was using almost solely Kodak Gold 100 or 200 and the photos look great.
Any tricks or tips  ?
Mateusz
_________________
Mateusz
No good story ever starts with drinking tea.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mateuszmolik/sets/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5019
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
| PhantomLord wrote: |
Thank you, it means a lot coming from you guys.
What I don't know how to handle is Kodak Gold 200. I'm getting very badly results from this negative. I rated it at ISO 160 like I do with most 200 negatives, but people faces look terrible on Kodak Gold and I don't know why. Now I'm trying rating it at different speeds and shooting in very particular conditions to find out what I could do wrong. I remember that my father was using almost solely Kodak Gold 100 or 200 and the photos look great.
Any tricks or tips ?
Mateusz |
Well I'm out of date doing head and shoulder shots with Kodak Vericolor using 120 film many moons ago, and so for portraiture today it might be easier to change film.......many guys reckon Kodak Portra is very good but haven't tried it myself.
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PhantomLord
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 476
Location: Szczecin, Poland
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
PhantomLord wrote:
I have Portra 160 waiting for special occasion as it's a little too expensive for casual shooting, at least for me. It's just in the last week I was watching photos taken many years ago by my father on Kodak Gold and I wonder if the film had changed or I'm doing something wrong  .
_________________
Mateusz
No good story ever starts with drinking tea.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mateuszmolik/sets/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Great result , I love them all!
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 3168
Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Fabulous shots from that film and OM combo!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PhantomLord
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 476
Location: Szczecin, Poland
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PhantomLord wrote:
Thank you guys.
Mateusz
_________________
Mateusz
No good story ever starts with drinking tea.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mateuszmolik/sets/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5019
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
| PhantomLord wrote: |
| I have Portra 160 waiting for special occasion as it's a little too expensive for casual shooting, at least for me. It's just in the last week I was watching photos taken many years ago by my father on Kodak Gold and I wonder if the film had changed or I'm doing something wrong . |
Well I look forward to know what you think of Portra esp for portraiture and skin tones. As for Gold 200 I've never disliked it for general shots and always had good results but it was\is a Joe public film and IMO would not be the best for facial shots...of course some one is going to show a portraiture shot with Gold and prove me wrong  
Also more R&D was usually put into ISO 400 film so it wouldn't surprise me if Gold 200 hasn't changed much over years.
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
