View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wuxiekeji
Joined: 15 Aug 2012 Posts: 213
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2014 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wuxiekeji wrote:
Marek wrote: |
On the other hand, the M39 ext. tubes and so forth look damn sexy (aluminium) |
You can get anodized aluminium extension tubes for Canon and without the electronic contacts (since for MF you don't need them) for pennies on eBay. _________________ Canon EOS 6D | Canon EOS 60D | Canon EOS-M | Voigtlander Nokton 1.4/35 | Zeiss Distagon C-Y 4/18 | Zeiss Distagon ZF 2/28 | Samyang 1.4/35 | Zeiss Planar C-Y 1.4/50 | Zeiss Planar C-Y 1.4/85 | Zeiss Makro-Planar C-Y 2.8/100 | Zeiss Sonnar C-Y 2.8/135 | Nikkor ED Ai-S 2.8/180 | Canon FD SSC Fluorite 2.8/300 | Tair-3S 4.5/300 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
Hi, I was just curious what can be red from the serial numbers "tattooed" on my silver (sometimes black) darlings?
Code: |
Helios 44-2 - 78148082
Tair 133 - N024965
Tair 300 PhS - 4557 (?!)
Telemegor 180 - 1653960
Trioplan 100 - 2529542
Triotar 135 - 4732709 |
What I'm interested in is obviously its "date of birth"!
Are last two numbers on Russian lens year of production or am I just far too tired and getting paranoid?
Marek _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
Hi, respecting my strong butterfly focus, I assumed Volna-9 macro might be a good pick for me for its market value - any thoughts?
Is IQ good enough to do a really solid macro? Any known problems tied to this ugly small lens? _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
Hi, I'm looking for an old manual lens type I've never done much research about - wide angle (the wider, the better).
Any recommendations? I want to shoot both indoor finished interior scenes for my stepfathers' business and butterflies The only wide angle I've ever messed with was Flektogon 35 my friend has.
Must go for a reasonably good price, since I'm unemployed again
Thanks! _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hemeterfilms
Joined: 04 Jul 2012 Posts: 80 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
hemeterfilms wrote:
All of the suggestions so far are admirable but rather exotic for a beginner and quite expensive. Why not get a Minolta 35 -70mm f3.5 macro . It would suit your butterfly interest, is of very high quality and still amazingly cheap |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kenetik
Joined: 02 Mar 2014 Posts: 524
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
kenetik wrote:
I agree the Minolta 35-70 is a good choice. Another choice would be the Vivitar 28-90 Series 1. Do some searches on here, that lens really is nice. _________________ ________________________________________________________
I buy lots of lenses and sometimes I even use them... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
Thanks! Minolta looks sharp and super-cheap. Vivitar looks rather soft.
What I forgot to mention in my first post - any silver German, Russian alternative?
(And wider than 35mm?)
What about Primagon or Flek 35? _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Older f/2.8 Flek is better built than f/2.4 version. Primagon very good, but slow. Then there is MIR 20mm. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
AH, just thought... have you considered Lydith? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
AH, just thought... have you considered Lydith? |
+1. Good but cheap lens. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16542 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Flares easily and not really sharp, there is better than that... _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
calvin83 wrote: |
woodrim wrote: |
AH, just thought... have you considered Lydith? |
+1. Good but cheap lens. |
Zebra, not silver. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
Flares easily and not really sharp, there is better than that... |
There is no other cheap <35mm German, Russian alternative. Any other choice in your mind? Pentacon 28 2.8? _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
Guys, please, is there any significant difference between EXA TO EOS adapter for postwar vs. prewar EXA lenses?
I just lost the auction for this old daddy, but I'd like to know for the future. The prewar ones tend to look even more lovely.
In other words, would EXA TO EOS adapter fitting well on my postwar Trioplan 100 also fit, lets say, on that Telemegor 150 from the link above? _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
I'm no expert, but I don't see why it wouldn't fit. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
It will fit. If it does not , it is might be the problem of the adapter. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
I'm no expert, but I don't see why it wouldn't fit. |
I was told (or warned) so, so I'm asking here, among the experts Thanks for opinion. I really should have won the old daddy. _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 961 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
Marek wrote: |
Sorry for doublepost
As I've red this many times, what about Primotar 135, or Diaplan 80/100?
Might that be a clever, better move to reach another sexy circles (made with lens almost no one actually owns) FOR REAL BARGAIN or am I out of major brain functions for the rest of the night?
Plain and simple - any experience, guys?
woodrim: thanks! Didn't find this one Bad googling, bad googling. I'll check it out tomorrow. |
If you want circles - pretty much anything made by Meyer will work. The trioplan 1.8/100 has the right combination of focal length and speed that it is famous for its sparkling bokeh - but even the el-cheapo Domiplan makes similar bokeh wide open.
Fujinon lenses also produce a very meyer-like bokeh:
The above pictures were made with the 2.2/55 fujinon wide open - a lens which carries no price premium to pay for internet hype threads!
There is a Fujinon 2.8/100 too, which I doubt costs as much as the 1.8/100 Trioplan online - and is sharper wide open. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
Hello, I already have a Trioplan, it's Domiron I'd kill for now
(I won one of the first Trioplan related auctions reasonably soon after my post you just quoted) _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
Sometimes I feel like screaming 6.739 CZK equals €244
_________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
Heavy bastard probably built of melted Soviet WW2 tanks arrived this Monday
Here are some older ones
Since March '13 I buy only silvers _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
It's not my "very first" time at all already but I found my latest transaction too ordinary and uninsteresting, so I'm continuing here.
I just bought pretty well looking silver Primotar 135/3.5 for $75 + customs and postage, hoping to be a reasonable price.
It was actually for $110 with possibility to negotiate. As my great grandfather was half Jew, I negotiated and did so successfully
Possibly a very fresh lucky auction, I believe this item to disappear till tomorrow's lunch.
Unlike blacks, I believe silver Primotars (in nice condition) are fairly rare in Central Europe. _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
You started this thread only this past spring, looking for recommendations, and now you're influencing what we buy. Or at least me. I have recently purchased 5.5/150 Telemegor, 5.5/180 Telemegor, and 3.5/135 Primotar. Unfortunately, only 150mm is silver. Maybe if I strip the black paint, they will all be silver? These join my other Meyer lenses; Lydith 3.5/30, Primagon 4.5/35, Helioplan 4.5/40, Domiplan 2.8/50, Trioplan 2.9/50, Primotar 3.5/80, Orestor 2.8/100, Orestor 2.8/135, and Orestegor 4/300. Is it safe to say I'm a fan? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Forgot to mention 3.5/75 Trioplan. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
Congratulations to Telemegor 150, I myself understimated one older auction with very nice pre-war version of this little big lens going for a reasonable price. Must have bought pre-war Tele-Tessar to find an inner harmony again
Also, Trioplan 75 and/or Orestors both look like lens I certainly wouldn't throw out from the window. _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|