View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:45 pm Post subject: My new lens: 1936 Leitz Elmar f= 9cm 1:4 |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
I could not resist bidding (and winning) on a 1936 9cm Elmar offered locally....
Condition was a bit of a gamble, but even if it's not really usable, it would make a sweet display-item, for the money I paid.
I received it yesterday, and the condition is much better than the ad-pics led me to expect. Focus is a bit stiff but RF-coupling seems to work well. It' allegedly cleaned (due to fungus) some time ago; in any case, the glass looks perfectly acceptable.
A few testshots, no interesting content:
#1: @ f/5.6, TTL-flash
#2: gloomy wheather @ f/9:
#3: crappy snap of how it looks mounted; the lens actually looks better than on this pics:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiftyonepointsix
Joined: 30 Apr 2017 Posts: 292
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiftyonepointsix wrote:
https://cameraderie.org/threads/what-do-you-look-for-in-your-gear.47454/page-2#post-336760
I picked up a post-war coated Elmar for $43 off Ebay, and one with coating marks for $20 at a camera show. The post-war lenses came apart for me, the pre-war lens- not sure, but I think the elements were Stamped into place. Some internal haze on the pre-war lens makes it a bit too-low contrast for the M Monochrom, but gives a "Kodachrome" character on the M9.
Look for a Yellow or Orange 34mm filter for use on the M Monochrom. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
I agree the contrast is not super-high, but enough to be adjusted to taste. My copy was cleaned, and I see no haze.
It accepts the filters from my Summaron 3.5cm f/3.5, for which I have an orange filter.
Since it's uncoated, a hood is a higher priority at this moment The hood from the Summaron is really too small for this one for general use. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiftyonepointsix
Joined: 30 Apr 2017 Posts: 292
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiftyonepointsix wrote:
Walz made a beautiful hood for this lens. I lucked into one at a camera show-
The haze in mine is not bad, visible with a strong light through the lens. But enough to lower contrast from when the lens was new. It irritates me that I can't get to the surface that needs cleaning. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
Friday I made a few portraits with it, the somewhat low contrast is really no issue. A matter of adjusting levels in post, and from there on set contrast to taste. Besides, the gentle rendering is a good starting point. It is noticeably soft wide open, so soft that I can even notice it on the crappy LCD of the Monochrom
After the Triotar-experience, I also checked my Elmar with a stronger flashlight; no haze, just many dust-specks.
Last edited by Sjak on Sun Dec 16, 2018 8:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16541 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
_________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
I have the helicoids for a 9cm and a 13.5cm I guess someone took out the optics for some reason and forgot to replace them, I've been trying to keep an eye out for the optical blocks, no luck so far. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
I have the helicoids for a 9cm and a 13.5cm I guess someone took out the optics for some reason and forgot to replace them, I've been trying to keep an eye out for the optical blocks, no luck so far. |
Maybe those were spare parts? Or maybe the glass itself was beyond cleaning (in the perception of the owner)? Old Leitz glass is sometimes very prone to scratching etc. The little mysteries of old lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
I have the helicoids for a 9cm and a 13.5cm I guess someone took out the optics for some reason and forgot to replace them, I've been trying to keep an eye out for the optical blocks, no luck so far. |
Sjak wrote: |
Maybe those were spare parts? Or maybe the glass itself was beyond cleaning (in the perception of the owner)? Old Leitz glass is sometimes very prone to scratching etc. The little mysteries of old lenses |
I rather suspect that the lens heads removed for the use with the 16464K helicoid to minimize the MFD. I barely use my lenses with the original helicoids.
BTW, I have the optics from a 1958 9cm Elmar in almost pristine condition (still in parts from an unsuccessful CLA-attempt) but it's not worth the effort to send it to Calgary. Those lenses are very cheap and the postage would be far too expensive. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|