View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 1:41 pm Post subject: More Jupiter 9! Highlights and Anastasia |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Let me begin by saying the rendering of highlights was completely intentional. I know how the Jupiter does this especially wide open, I like it, so I picked an area which would guarantee some. I know most will not like the image because of them. Comments and criticisms are very much appreciated! Thanks
Same specs as my previous post with the cat:
Lens: Jupiter 9 at f2
Camera: st701
Film: Kodak 160vc
Scanner: Canoscan 700f
Retouched for dust and slight exposure adjustment (+0.10). No other corrections.
~Marc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
I like it, good capture, and backlit subjects can be a pain to expose enough
detail. More importantly, does Anastasia like it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Quote: |
More importantly, does Anastasia like it? |
She has the typical girl trait of hating every picture she is in. Funny thing though, despite that fact she throws out some good poses and doesn't mind my incessant picture-taking.
Here's another:
Again wide open. Only retouched for dust spots. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Another nice shot, Marc. With this particular subject you can't go wrong, unless you miss focus entirely! The last shot is for the wall. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5019 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Any reason why you couldn't use a small amount of frontal flash? You can always experiment by placing white hankerchiefs over the flash gun if using a lens wide open. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Quote: |
Any reason why you couldn't use a small amount of frontal flash? |
No reason, just didn't. The fujica camera that I use does not have a hot or cold shoe so I'd need to get on my separate bracket. I wasn't keen on over complicating a simple lens test. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
Personally, I love the specular highlights in these images. And that's
just it - the opinion of "bokeh" varies with personal opinions.
That said, I love the second image with the very fine pose and
good colors. You've really made Anastasia stand out from the background,
and have brought out her singular beauty. What a
great model! And you do very well with the Fujica. _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5019 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
***No reason, just didn't. The fujica camera that I use does not have a hot or cold shoe so I'd need to get on my separate bracket. I wasn't keen on over complicating a simple lens test.***
Well you welcome criticism:- in the 2nd photo your model has a green cast on her skin, on my monitor............even photoshop will automatically correct it, and not using flash can sometimes give you problems in shade.
Ignore above and appologies if my monitor needs calibrating. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
I fully welcome criticism, so thanks. I guess on my monitor it doesn't so much appear as a cast, but rather just a cool image overall. I wouldn't let photoshop auto correct it (the program just turns everything purple) but a slight adjustment to the green slider is probably in order. I should definitely try to experiment with fill flashes. Despite having a decent flash, I've never used it. Thanks for the tip. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Second photograph is a really WOW capture!
I have problems with the first one. Seems the bokeh rendering of the lens is doing a better job than the subjects' face was light at the moment of capturing (sorry for my bad English)
Cheers
Tobbs _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Quote: |
Seems the bokeh rendering of the lens is doing a better job than the subjects' face was light at the moment of capturing (sorry for my bad English) |
It was a hard capture overall to make. She was spinning (you can tell because of her hair) so I'm more surprised the photo came out at all. But yes, I would have to agree with you in this case. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|