Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Mirror Lenses
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 6:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Sigma 600 does a very good job, especially considering the focal length. It has a longer focus throw than the Vivitar 600mm solid cat I have and is easier to focus.








PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whow, good images in this thread! I have to use my russian mirror lens 3M-5A more often!


PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The many good images in this thread animated me to take out the Tokina again this morning.

My impression from today is that while the very far and very near are not as sharp as I would wish, the middle distances are quite OK.

Focus bracketing is of course critical.

One from this morning straight out of LR



PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tamron 55B at Pentax K20D


Fox by Ouwesok, on Flickr


Common Kestrel by Ouwesok, on Flickr


Grey Leg Goose by Ouwesok, on Flickr

Also usefull for shy insects

Green-eyed Hawker by Ouwesok, on Flickr


PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bernhardas wrote:
The many good images in this thread animated me to take out the Tokina again this morning.

My impression from today is that while the very far and very near are not as sharp as I would wish, the middle distances are quite OK.

Focus bracketing is of course critical.

One from this morning straight out of LR



Gorgeous shot Bernhardas. The Tokina is a very good lens, as shown in your pic here it has excellent contrast and can be very sharp, and I still think this lens is a bargain.. I think that being better at less than infinity and long distance is probably true of all mirrors.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="kenetik"]
bernhardas wrote:
The many good images in this thread animated me to take out the Tokina again this morning.

My impression from today is that while the very far and very near are not as sharp as I would wish, the middle distances are quite OK.

Focus bracketing is of course critical.

One from this morning straight out of LR


Gorgeous shot Bernhardas. The Tokina is a very good lens, as shown in your pic here it has excellent contrast and can be very sharp, and I still think this lens is a bargain.. I think that being better at less than infinity and long distance is probably true of all mirrors.


Thanks.

Well they are definitely a bargain,as the whole set in good condition can often be found for half the price of a Tamron.
I think at some point of timne I will definitely try one of the other better Mirrors but my Budget for this year was already blown in March Embarassed


PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here again 3 samples with Leica 8/500mm mirror and Nikon D700








Many thanks Olivier. Will send you within the next days a PM !


Wink


PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thx Rolf !
I love these pictures, particularly the Hamburger clown ! Very Happy


PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks, folks, keep them coming. Rolf: My wallet shivers when I see the Leica name.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

3M-5CA again Smile


PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And the Soligor C/D 300mm


PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nordentro: Now that's what I like. The first one has some good pop, the second has pop, poop too.


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just curious. Do everyone use lens shade for mirror lens? I wonder if you loss much contrast by not using it.


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here are some of my examples. Tamron 55BB shot on a mixture of crop sensor (Canon 550D, T2i) or full frame (SONY A7)


#1

#2

#3

#4

#5


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 4:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

drjs wrote:
Just curious. Do everyone use lens shade for mirror lens? I wonder if you loss much contrast by not using it.


The two that I have flare BADLY so I always use a deep hood. An example of the Tokina 500 where sunlight hit the front element despite the hood being on:



PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Tamron 55B has a built-in Hood. So I always use it.
Congrats drjs for your pictures !
Very neat and clear, good contrast, good composition.

Seeing your moon shot, it made me remember these ones I uploaded in a topic comparing different lenses mounted on the Olympus PEN E-P2 : Canon EF 70-200 F4 + Kenko extender x1,4 ; Tamron 55B + Tamron SP 01F doubler ; Tamron 55B alone.
That makes respectively in eq full frame format : 560mm, 2000mm, 1000mm.
http://forum.mflenses.com/moon-shots-with-different-combos-tamron-sp-500-f8-t64913,highlight,%2Bmoon.html

Here is the 55B alone
Pen E-P2 + Tamron SP 500 F8 without doubler. ISO 400, 1/160s.
That makes 1000mm eq 24x36 as the m4/3 format is half the full frame format.
cropped to fill the frame


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 10:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great images here. The best mirror thread so far.

Below few samples with Leica 8/500mm mirror and D700/D800







Wink


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 10:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

3M-5A on EOS 5D



PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for all these wonderful pictures. I am a true believer that in the age of excellent ISO performance, focus peaking and automated exposure compensation via auto ISO, these mirror lens will find many new interesting applications where it was impossible in the film days.

Further, I also want to observe that most of the examples don't seem to exhibit the donut shaped brokeh which was suppose to be super common when using mirror.


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

drjs wrote:

Further, I also want to observe that most of the examples don't seem to exhibit the donut shaped brokeh which was suppose to be super common when using mirror.

Happy to oblige Smile




PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

woodrim wrote:
Nordentro: Now that's what I like. The first one has some good pop, the second has pop, poop too.


3D poop! Laughing


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did a bit of a comparison today between the Canon FD 500 / 8 -which has slight fungus, a Tamrom 55B 500 / 8 and a Phoenix ( Samyang ) 500 / 8.
I took the same series of pictures with each lens, used the Sony A6000 and a Benbo tripod, I did try some hand held but I can't hold a camera steady enough to get consistent results, I'd much rather use a tripod or monopod.
I have adjusted the levels on most of these, mainly to be kind to the Phoenix / Samyang for which I haven't got the right hood, I used a collapsible rubber hood which was long enough but far too wide, and wasn't enough. I tried the lens later with a roll of black card for a hood and the difference was amazing.
All shot at ISO 500. The furnace is about 3/4 mile away and the power poles just over a mile. I started to shoot some pictures showing the donut bokeh, but a guy turned up with a ride on grass cutter and made a dust storm!


Canon FD








Phoenix / Samyang








Tamron








The Canon is very good, especially considering it has some fungus and has been taken apart to clean the worst. It's the sharpest, and the easiest to focus.
The Tamron is close though, it's a very nice lens and well worth the money they sell for. Which is about the price of a new Samyang, which isn't quite in the same league. This lens demands the longest, tightest hood possible, even pointed away from the sun. If that is done then it isn't bad, it's advantage is that it is light and compact making it a walkabout lens. It doesn't have a tripod mount unlike the Canon and the Tamron, but the light weight is no problem using the cameras tripod mount.


Last edited by Lloydy on Thu Jul 31, 2014 10:13 pm; edited 4 times in total


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love this thread. Again D700 and Leica 8/500 mm mirror







Wink


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 8:17 pm    Post subject: TAMRON 55BB Reply with quote

(my second one the bad one I started a thread about went back..) A couple of shots from the bird reserve. Pentax K-r.




PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Registered to post a few examples of the Tamron 55B 500m mirror lens - including a couple of donuts. I picked mine up from Ludlow market for £80. I really like it - a valuable addition to the 'armoury'. These were taken with a D90. I have a D7000 now, so curious to see how it performs on that.








Thanks for all the valuable info on manual lenses. I have a burgeoning Tamron Adaptall collection that has the benefit of fitting both my D7000 and a backup Sony A700. On the basis of this forum I bought a Helios 44-2 which is a joy too.

[EDIT - Thanks, Mo, for posting my photos below. I'm not sure why they're no displaying on my post. The URLs are complete in the 'posting box' and the message previews ok, but the URLs don't seem to have translated to the forum page ] Confused


Last edited by Flapper on Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:55 pm; edited 1 time in total