View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sceptic
Joined: 01 Jun 2013 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
sceptic wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
Sometimes you drop lucky, and you just did. |
Yes, it seems I did. I have bought quite a few not-so-good camera kits from the same store (mostly to contribute to their work, their profits go to charity) and they usually ask the same price almost regardless of the actual lenses included (they really have no clue what they´re selling), so I figured I´ve earned this one _________________ Sony A7R and wildly varying flora of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I've had some great deals myself, but this one is a real steal. I expect it to be nothing less than outstanding. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sceptic
Joined: 01 Jun 2013 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2015 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
sceptic wrote:
The adapter arrived yesterday (Rainbow Imaging on eBay has China prices and US delivery times, i.e. not four weeks to Europe) so, naturally, I had to shoot something and post it here.
That something turned out to be my glass of Coke and my daughter's bike (36 MP versions available by clicking the links):
Minolta MC TELE ROKKOR-PF 100/2 test shot (f/4) by scepticswe, on Flickr
Minolta MC TELE ROKKOR-PF 100/2 test shot (f/2) by scepticswe, on Flickr
Focusing turned out to be ever so stiff when trying to fine tune the focus point, so perhaps I'll strip her down and grease her up... _________________ Sony A7R and wildly varying flora of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2015 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Beautiful. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padam
Joined: 09 Oct 2012 Posts: 175 Location: Hungary
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padam wrote:
Great performance (as expected) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
My experience with that lens is limited. Only two of them. One was a time ago, very nice lens I remember. The actual is very good one too.
Only a bit strong the CA in backlight situations, especailly at F/2 to F/4.
If you want to use it with a bright back (f.e. clear or white wall, bright window, etc) perhaps you will need to subexposed the subject, or have strong CA.
There are a lot of those lenses with problems with the coating in the internal rear elements. I saw some.
Horacio. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|