Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
| lumens pixel wrote: |
However I really do not need all the noise about how good the MD 100 2,5 is. I am still convincing myself I do not need it since I own the 85 F2,0, the 75-150 and the Canon 100 2,8.
The difference between 85 and 100 does look like one step forward? Right?
Oh wait! I just also bought the 70-210 F4.
Help me please. |
Did you know: last week MDIII 100/2.5 in great condition was sold for measly $167.5 with US-only shipping?
I bled with every new bid.
Sorry, I guess I'm not really helping  _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |