View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pich900
Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 1745 Location: The Netherlands/Zwolle
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
pich900 wrote:
an other quick shot with this lens, kid's portrait at school during the Saint Nicholas event....:
light PP and crop (click for full resolution)...
and B&W conversion with silver effex:
_________________ All my lenses are for sale, nikkor, Angenieux, Zeiss etc.....
Regards,
Pascal
-------------------------------------------------------
Nikon D700 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
significantimagery
Joined: 20 Apr 2013 Posts: 75 Location: Kansas City
|
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
significantimagery wrote:
Here are some more photos taken with this lens at its closest focus:
I thought this flare was interesting:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
romans001
Joined: 06 Aug 2013 Posts: 41 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
romans001 wrote:
Hello all
i am very much interested in buying cyclop 85/1.5 but i am worried that some of them have protruding rear element
how should i know if i am buying the right one without that? cyclop version 1 is ok?
any ideas how to recognize which cyclop is "ok" for m42?
what about these?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4710 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
romans001 wrote: |
Hello all
i am very much interested in buying cyclop 85/1.5 but i am worried that some of them have protruding rear element
how should i know if i am buying the right one without that? cyclop version 1 is ok?
any ideas how to recognize which cyclop is "ok" for m42?
what about these?
|
I think this is the wrong version (protruding type). The barrel is different on the non protruding type.
Click here to see on Ebay.de _________________ Lars | Lens collection | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
romans001
Joined: 06 Aug 2013 Posts: 41 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
romans001 wrote:
much appreciate
i thought the same
ps: i am wondering how could someone bought this lens for 10Eur or similar price, crazy,
today i lost one auction, 200Eur was not enough
UPDATE: seller responded to my question and he said that there is no protruding element |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 1998 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
I think it's because it has been shaved. I have this cyclop (non Helios), and it has an useless(apparently) rear element.
Btw, I think it's not the right topik to speak about it , this one would fit better : http://forum.mflenses.com/cyclop-the-one-eyed-monster-t15612,highlight,%2Bcyclop.html _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark
Joined: 01 Dec 2012 Posts: 251 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mark wrote:
Nice lens! Was it attached to night vision system as well? Or where did you find it? _________________ Latest post on my blog (no new posts):
http://lightbeam-photography.blogspot.hu/2013/10/sword-lilies.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eugen Mezei
Joined: 17 May 2008 Posts: 265
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|