View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2018 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
tb_a wrote: |
Piktuolis,
I have already mentioned it before, but nobody reacted to my question.
As I have the same camera as you (K20D) it always comes to my mind that it produces somehow slightly different colors compared to my other cameras. When I look at your pictures I have somehow the same feeling. However, I haven't used mine recently. Which color settings are you using in your camera? Did you somehow reduce the intensity of the colors?
I still had no time to play around to find it out myself. Maybe it's the different sensor produced by Samsung in this Pentax model. It may also be that I am getting somehow crazy and it's all only my personal imagination... |
It is quite common that different cameras, more specifically different sensors produce different colors. I see this very clearly when I use my Olympus M5 MkII vs Panasonic GH4 (actually all of them). Oly is much colder, less saturated and has less intense colors, Panasonic sensors always had intense, more saturated and more vibrant colors. But I always use to match the camera settings. Same when I used Canon, later Nikon. Always and still, quite some visible difference... _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
tb_a wrote: |
Piktuolis,
I have already mentioned it before, but nobody reacted to my question.
As I have the same camera as you (K20D) it always comes to my mind that it produces somehow slightly different colors compared to my other cameras. When I look at your pictures I have somehow the same feeling. However, I haven't used mine recently. Which color settings are you using in your camera? Did you somehow reduce the intensity of the colors?
I still had no time to play around to find it out myself. Maybe it's the different sensor produced by Samsung in this Pentax model. It may also be that I am getting somehow crazy and it's all only my personal imagination... |
It is quite common that different cameras, more specifically different sensors produce different colors. I see this very clearly when I use my Olympus M5 MkII vs Panasonic GH4 (actually all of them). Oly is much colder, less saturated and has less intense colors, Panasonic sensors always had intense, more saturated and more vibrant colors. But I always use to match the camera settings. Same when I used Canon, later Nikon. Always and still, quite some visible difference... |
Well, that's an old comment I made some years ago. Meantime it's more than clear to me as well.
As I just finalized another lens comparison test I also realized again that old Takumar lenses generally tend to produce slightly warmer colors compared to other manufacturer's lenses when used on the same camera/sensor. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6008 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
tb_a wrote: |
As I just finalized another lens comparison test I also realized again that old Takumar lenses generally tend to produce slightly warmer colors compared to other manufacturer's lenses when used on the same camera/sensor. |
Yes, that is something that I have also noticed and it is a part of the charm of old Takumars.
The Meyer Primagon usually gives less saturated and more muted colour - a feature which I like very much.
Of course software like Lightroom doesn't necessarily agree and with auto exposure post production it tries to "enrich" the image.
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6008 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
A couple more from this very nice lens
Tom
#1
#2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I love the Primagon, one of my favourite lenses. Funnily enough, I always thought it gave bright, vivid colours. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2929 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
_________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 244 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
Old topic but to the point. I picked up a Meyer 35mm 4.5 Primagon recently and it arrived the other day. Yes, at 4.5 it is "slow" but wow this is a good lens. With my testing so far I no reservations about using it wide open at 4.5. It is sharp and contrasty. Beautiful lens.
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 761 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
connloyalist wrote: |
Old topic but to the point. I picked up a Meyer 35mm 4.5 Primagon recently and it arrived the other day. Yes, at 4.5 it is "slow" but wow this is a good lens. With my testing so far I no reservations about using it wide open at 4.5. It is sharp and contrasty. Beautiful lens. |
I love mine. It's got a very distinct character different from any other lens. Awesome Meyer-Optik bokeh too.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 244 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
KEO wrote: |
connloyalist wrote: |
Old topic but to the point. I picked up a Meyer 35mm 4.5 Primagon recently and it arrived the other day. Yes, at 4.5 it is "slow" but wow this is a good lens. With my testing so far I no reservations about using it wide open at 4.5. It is sharp and contrasty. Beautiful lens. |
I love mine. It's got a very distinct character different from any other lens. Awesome Meyer-Optik bokeh too.
|
Curiosity question (and slightly off topic). What is the Steinheil München lens I see in you profile pic?
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 761 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
connloyalist wrote: |
Curiosity question (and slightly off topic). What is the Steinheil München lens I see in you profile pic? |
It's the 135mm Culminar f/4.5 in LTM. You can pick them up really cheap, but they're delightful little lenses. Tiny! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10539 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
KEO wrote: |
connloyalist wrote: |
Curiosity question (and slightly off topic). What is the Steinheil München lens I see in you profile pic? |
It's the 135mm Culminar f/4.5 in LTM. You can pick them up really cheap, but they're delightful little lenses. Tiny! |
Steinheil Münchkins! _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 761 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
KEO wrote: |
connloyalist wrote: |
Curiosity question (and slightly off topic). What is the Steinheil München lens I see in you profile pic? |
It's the 135mm Culminar f/4.5 in LTM. You can pick them up really cheap, but they're delightful little lenses. Tiny! |
Steinheil Münchkins! |
That's a good nickname for the Culminar 135 4.5.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|