Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Meyer Optik Gorlitz Primotar 180mm f/3.5
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:24 am    Post subject: Meyer Optik Gorlitz Primotar 180mm f/3.5 Reply with quote

Well, only seven months it took me to finally modify this lens mount.
http://forum.mflenses.com/funky-mount-on-primotar-t74045,highlight,+primotar.html

I made it a tad too short, so it goes past infinity. I'll have to insert a spacer to get it right or maybe make it a closer focus. I really don't need infinity for how I will be using it.

I like the lens and can see myself using it frequently for its bokeh. It's almost sharp at wide open (most pictures) and sharpens up quickly with a little stop down. I'll be using it mostly wide open.





















PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very good results, I just got one like it very cheap but not very good condition.


PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice! Congratulations. Smile I have one in M42 in good condition but haven't used it much. It's too big and heavy for me.


PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It has a very good rendering, I guess.

What about CA?

Light from the back?

Sun in the pics?

Thanks and congratulations. It seems to be a solid good lens


PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

papasito wrote:
It has a very good rendering, I guess.

What about CA?

Light from the back?

Sun in the pics?

Thanks and congratulations. It seems to be a solid good lens


I have seen some, but not much. Here is an image loaded full size, taken at f/3.5 1/4000 and nit perfect focus. Some blue can be seen in the chain at the right.

Lens is big and heavy, but not nearly as bad as some others I have. The 2.8/180 Sonnar and 4/300 Meyer are much worse. This Primotar is in very good shape. Excellent glass, smooth focus, and nice to look through. It is better than I expected. My 3.5/135 Primotar is not as nice to use. I paid only $32 including shipping - I suspect because of the mount type.


PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like Dog


PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

woodrim wrote:
papasito wrote:
It has a very good rendering, I guess.

What about CA?

Light from the back?

Sun in the pics?

Thanks and congratulations. It seems to be a solid good lens


I have seen some, but not much. Here is an image loaded full size, taken at f/3.5 1/4000 and nit perfect focus. Some blue can be seen in the chain at the right.

Lens is big and heavy, but not nearly as bad as some others I have. The 2.8/180 Sonnar and 4/300 Meyer are much worse. This Primotar is in very good shape. Excellent glass, smooth focus, and nice to look through. It is better than I expected. My 3.5/135 Primotar is not as nice to use. I paid only $32 including shipping - I suspect because of the mount type.
}

Very very low CA. Almost negligible.

Really I can't see it practically.

Great lens to me.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arghhhh. I just had a blade slip out of position.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oooohhhhh.....I feel your pain Sad


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lloydy wrote:
oooohhhhh.....I feel your pain Sad


Thanks. Sent desperate message in repair forum, hoping that spotmatic responds.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

M.O.G. lenses are pretty simple, the only issue is the amount of blades - if it's similar in construction to the Pentacons? There shouldn't be any rocket science in there.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 9:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just found my way through it. The front most ring does unscrew. The lens needs a little more effort and has those opposing notches for a tool. Once inside I was able to reposition the renegade blade, but seems maybe slightly bent. Testing it revealed that it will come out again if turned past f/5.6. My cure was to set the perture stop at f/5.6 and never go beyond. I use it mostly at wide open anyway.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's most likely oil on the blades, even if it's not obviously visible - just around the edges and the slots the blades operate in. I've had Pentacons that looked free from oil that suddenly threw blades, I've put them back and it's happened again. I've taken the glass out and left all the mechanicals in place and just soaked the whole thing in industrial degreaser, then lighter fuel, then soapy water, then dried thoroughly before applying a tiny bit of grease to the helicoid. And it's worked. These old lenses can be very robust and aren't harmed by a bit of vigorous cleaning, and the glass often comes out in two blocks.
I boiled a Soligor 135 in a strong mixture of water soluble degreaser and it worked a treat, but I did get banned from doing it ever again, the smell was through the house for days! Rolling Eyes


PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Once you get all the grease off, a bit of graphite lube inthe blades works nicely. Be sue to thoroughly blow off the excess after working it in.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice results - well worth the effort of mount construction and now, aperture blade repair.

P.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 5:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems like this might be a common problem with this lens. Mine too had a blade displaced when I got it. It was an easy fix though, can't even remember what neede to be done.


PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like Dog

Nice job! The image results made it worth it.

I concur that it's a film of sticky oil on the blades. Suffered the same issue with a Minolta TC 135mm f/4.


PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

luisalegria wrote:
Once you get all the grease off, a bit of graphite lube inthe blades works nicely. Be sue to thoroughly blow off the excess after working it in.


I would be hesitant to use anything with particulates near optics, personally.


PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think it is a lube issue anyway. It appears there is an out-of-perfect-flat probably caused by attempting to move the ring when blade out of position. I can see it go out of flat when turning, and especially past f/5.6. I do not want to open up a can of worms by trying to remove and repair. I have proven to myself over and over again that I should not do that. However, I have thought about a clever and unorthodox method of preventing the blade from slipping out of its place. If I do it, I'll share.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When is corner performance important?



PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2020 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm sorry for reviving such an old topic.

I've got a primotar 180mm with some aperture problems. I've managed to easily remove the front element. But the entire thing will need to come out of the barrel for the aperture repair. How on earth do you remove the rear mount on that lens? where is it supposed to split? (I've got the m42 variant).

Kind regards,
Jorn


PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2020 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The mount seems a permanent part of the rear half of the lens. The two halves unscrew, leaving the glass and diaphragm in the front half. There may be some small screws that need to be loosened to allow separation of the halves - one of mine did, the other didn't. I bought a parts lens just for the rear half with M42 mount.


PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2020 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks so much for the reply, this project has been killing me!
Where do the two halves split? Above or below the focus ring?


PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 12:50 pm    Post subject: worth trading two helios lenses? Reply with quote

Since the topic is alive again, I have somebody who wants to trade one of these in M42 for two Helios lenses, one Helios 44m and one older Zebra 44-2 ... Would you consider this to be a fair trade? (and yes, I have other Helios lenses that I use, these are "extras" for trading or selling)


PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 2:58 pm    Post subject: Re: worth trading two helios lenses? Reply with quote

karthikrr wrote:
Since the topic is alive again, I have somebody who wants to trade one of these in M42 for two Helios lenses, one Helios 44m and one older Zebra 44-2 ... Would you consider this to be a fair trade? (and yes, I have other Helios lenses that I use, these are "extras" for trading or selling)


Given the cheap prices for Helios 44, I would do that in a heartbeat if the big Primotar is in good condition optically. Make sure the diaphragm is working properly. Also, and especially since it's M42, I recommend using it with a helicoid to improve the minimum focusing distance. I have used mine several times recently.


#1


#2


#3


#4


#5