View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:24 am Post subject: Meyer Optik Gorlitz Primotar 180mm f/3.5 |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Well, only seven months it took me to finally modify this lens mount.
http://forum.mflenses.com/funky-mount-on-primotar-t74045,highlight,+primotar.html
I made it a tad too short, so it goes past infinity. I'll have to insert a spacer to get it right or maybe make it a closer focus. I really don't need infinity for how I will be using it.
I like the lens and can see myself using it frequently for its bokeh. It's almost sharp at wide open (most pictures) and sharpens up quickly with a little stop down. I'll be using it mostly wide open.
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EDGARVE
Joined: 24 Nov 2015 Posts: 89 Location: Mexico
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
EDGARVE wrote:
Very good results, I just got one like it very cheap but not very good condition. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
Nice! Congratulations. I have one in M42 in good condition but haven't used it much. It's too big and heavy for me. _________________ my flickr stream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
It has a very good rendering, I guess.
What about CA?
Light from the back?
Sun in the pics?
Thanks and congratulations. It seems to be a solid good lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
papasito wrote: |
It has a very good rendering, I guess.
What about CA?
Light from the back?
Sun in the pics?
Thanks and congratulations. It seems to be a solid good lens |
I have seen some, but not much. Here is an image loaded full size, taken at f/3.5 1/4000 and nit perfect focus. Some blue can be seen in the chain at the right.
Lens is big and heavy, but not nearly as bad as some others I have. The 2.8/180 Sonnar and 4/300 Meyer are much worse. This Primotar is in very good shape. Excellent glass, smooth focus, and nice to look through. It is better than I expected. My 3.5/135 Primotar is not as nice to use. I paid only $32 including shipping - I suspect because of the mount type. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
_________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
papasito wrote: |
It has a very good rendering, I guess.
What about CA?
Light from the back?
Sun in the pics?
Thanks and congratulations. It seems to be a solid good lens |
I have seen some, but not much. Here is an image loaded full size, taken at f/3.5 1/4000 and nit perfect focus. Some blue can be seen in the chain at the right.
Lens is big and heavy, but not nearly as bad as some others I have. The 2.8/180 Sonnar and 4/300 Meyer are much worse. This Primotar is in very good shape. Excellent glass, smooth focus, and nice to look through. It is better than I expected. My 3.5/135 Primotar is not as nice to use. I paid only $32 including shipping - I suspect because of the mount type. |
}
Very very low CA. Almost negligible.
Really I can't see it practically.
Great lens to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Arghhhh. I just had a blade slip out of position. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
oooohhhhh.....I feel your pain _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
oooohhhhh.....I feel your pain |
Thanks. Sent desperate message in repair forum, hoping that spotmatic responds. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
M.O.G. lenses are pretty simple, the only issue is the amount of blades - if it's similar in construction to the Pentacons? There shouldn't be any rocket science in there. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Just found my way through it. The front most ring does unscrew. The lens needs a little more effort and has those opposing notches for a tool. Once inside I was able to reposition the renegade blade, but seems maybe slightly bent. Testing it revealed that it will come out again if turned past f/5.6. My cure was to set the perture stop at f/5.6 and never go beyond. I use it mostly at wide open anyway. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
It's most likely oil on the blades, even if it's not obviously visible - just around the edges and the slots the blades operate in. I've had Pentacons that looked free from oil that suddenly threw blades, I've put them back and it's happened again. I've taken the glass out and left all the mechanicals in place and just soaked the whole thing in industrial degreaser, then lighter fuel, then soapy water, then dried thoroughly before applying a tiny bit of grease to the helicoid. And it's worked. These old lenses can be very robust and aren't harmed by a bit of vigorous cleaning, and the glass often comes out in two blocks.
I boiled a Soligor 135 in a strong mixture of water soluble degreaser and it worked a treat, but I did get banned from doing it ever again, the smell was through the house for days! _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Once you get all the grease off, a bit of graphite lube inthe blades works nicely. Be sue to thoroughly blow off the excess after working it in. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009 Posts: 826 Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
pdccameras wrote:
Nice results - well worth the effort of mount construction and now, aperture blade repair.
P. _________________ Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
It seems like this might be a common problem with this lens. Mine too had a blade displaced when I got it. It was an easy fix though, can't even remember what neede to be done. _________________ my flickr stream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WNG555
Joined: 18 Dec 2014 Posts: 784 Location: Arrid-Zone-A, USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WNG555 wrote:
Nice job! The image results made it worth it.
I concur that it's a film of sticky oil on the blades. Suffered the same issue with a Minolta TC 135mm f/4. _________________ "The eyes are useless when the mind is blind."
Sony ILCE-6000, SELP1650, SEL1855, SEL55210, SEL5018. Sigma 19/30/60mm f2.8 EX DN Art.
Rokinon 8mm f3.5 Fish-Eye, 14mm f2.8 IF ED UMC. Samyang 12mm f2.8 ED AS NCS Fish-Eye.
And a bunch of Manual-Focus Lenses
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
devinw
Joined: 19 Aug 2016 Posts: 207 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
devinw wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Once you get all the grease off, a bit of graphite lube inthe blades works nicely. Be sue to thoroughly blow off the excess after working it in. |
I would be hesitant to use anything with particulates near optics, personally. _________________
Camera: Sony a6300
E-Mount: Zeiss/Sony 16-70 f/4, Samyang 12mm f/2
Rokkor: MD PG 50mm f1.4, MD 100mm Macro f3.5, MD 135mm f2.8, MD Zoom 35-70mm f3.5, MD Zoom 75-150 f4
Canon FD: nFD 50mm f1.4, Tokina AT-X 100-300mm f4
My Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/westonde/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I don't think it is a lube issue anyway. It appears there is an out-of-perfect-flat probably caused by attempting to move the ring when blade out of position. I can see it go out of flat when turning, and especially past f/5.6. I do not want to open up a can of worms by trying to remove and repair. I have proven to myself over and over again that I should not do that. However, I have thought about a clever and unorthodox method of preventing the blade from slipping out of its place. If I do it, I'll share. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
When is corner performance important?
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jbladel
Joined: 05 Sep 2020 Posts: 6 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2020 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jbladel wrote:
I'm sorry for reviving such an old topic.
I've got a primotar 180mm with some aperture problems. I've managed to easily remove the front element. But the entire thing will need to come out of the barrel for the aperture repair. How on earth do you remove the rear mount on that lens? where is it supposed to split? (I've got the m42 variant).
Kind regards,
Jorn _________________ I have no idea but I'm going to do it anyway |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2020 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
The mount seems a permanent part of the rear half of the lens. The two halves unscrew, leaving the glass and diaphragm in the front half. There may be some small screws that need to be loosened to allow separation of the halves - one of mine did, the other didn't. I bought a parts lens just for the rear half with M42 mount. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jbladel
Joined: 05 Sep 2020 Posts: 6 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2020 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jbladel wrote:
Thanks so much for the reply, this project has been killing me!
Where do the two halves split? Above or below the focus ring? _________________ I have no idea but I'm going to do it anyway |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karthikrr
Joined: 04 Jun 2019 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 12:50 pm Post subject: worth trading two helios lenses? |
|
|
karthikrr wrote:
Since the topic is alive again, I have somebody who wants to trade one of these in M42 for two Helios lenses, one Helios 44m and one older Zebra 44-2 ... Would you consider this to be a fair trade? (and yes, I have other Helios lenses that I use, these are "extras" for trading or selling) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 2:58 pm Post subject: Re: worth trading two helios lenses? |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
karthikrr wrote: |
Since the topic is alive again, I have somebody who wants to trade one of these in M42 for two Helios lenses, one Helios 44m and one older Zebra 44-2 ... Would you consider this to be a fair trade? (and yes, I have other Helios lenses that I use, these are "extras" for trading or selling) |
Given the cheap prices for Helios 44, I would do that in a heartbeat if the big Primotar is in good condition optically. Make sure the diaphragm is working properly. Also, and especially since it's M42, I recommend using it with a helicoid to improve the minimum focusing distance. I have used mine several times recently.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|