View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 4:00 pm Post subject: MC Quantaray 85-300mm/F5 - Any good? |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Seems no info online about this lens.
Got it from ebay, looks great, but is for C/FD mount, so what about image quality? does it worth to be converted to modern mount? _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 748 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
No tellin'! Ritz Camera went to several different suppliers for their Quantaray branded lenses. Some are Sigma. Probably all are from the lowest cost supplier. _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
It's zoom ring "click shifts", and enables macro down to 1:2. Maybe this give a clue? _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Seen fairly often in other brands like Soligor.
My guess is most likely made by Sun, one of the last series before they got out of the consumer lens business.
No idea about quality, not many people have properly tested it, probably.
Why dont you test it and tell us.
BTW, what camera have you got ? _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Definitely a Sun - here is a Spiratone ad from 1981 identifying it as such -
http://books.google.com/books?id=vN2DsQuik3oC&pg=PA164&lpg=PA164&dq=sun+85-300+f/5&source=bl&ots=BuIvCrN38e&sig=LwvztRchZBF26BCet2JX_5COSv4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=7BhMU6KNLqWEygHEsYDIAw&ved=0CCUQ6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=sun%2085-300%20f%2F5&f=false _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
I have SLT-A57, so not easy to mount. I bought it for another purpose, where I need separate zoom and focus rings, but it looks so solid, it's tempting to try. _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Canon-FD-Lens-to-Minolta-MA-Sony-Alpha-Mount-Adapter-Ring-Infinity-focus-Glass-/271218519769?pt=US_Lens_Adapters_Mounts_Tubes&hash=item3f25e22ed9
There is an adapter available, not that expensive, but it has a correcting lens. This will degrade quality, increase effective focal length, decrease effective aperture, etc.
Better is to change the mount. I have done this often, and with third party FD mount lenses its not usually that hard.
I do this regularly to Pentax PK, Alpha is almost the same register so it should work just as well. I get a little past infinity on all the ones I have converted (requiring adding spacers), so there should be some margin of error for Alpha.
Your lens may be different, but its worth looking. Its a fun project anyway.
Start with a glassless M42 adapter like this
http://www.ebay.com/itm/M42-to-Minolta-AF-Sony-a100-a300-a350-a700-a900-adapter-/301152356067?pt=US_Lens_Adapters_Mounts_Tubes&hash=item461e1446e3
Dismantle the FD mount on the lens, until you reveal the mount screws (that hold the FD mount on the lens body)
drill and countersink screw holes on the M42 adapter to match the screws holding the FD mount.
Replace the FD mount with the drilled M42 adapter, if possible using the same screws.
Voila, an Alpha mount lens. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Well, I have adapting experience of the following systems to Sony Alpha:
Petri breech lock:
Easy, unscrew there, cut off that pin, manufacture new shim, install.
Vivitar PK mount lens made by Kobori:
Same as Petri, since these Vivitars have HUGE rear brass component, which can be easilly removed and new mount fitted.
Konica Hexanon series:
Real pain in the back, too much machine working and new part manufacture, does not worth.
Osawa for Mamiya ZE:
As long as you have CNC, no significant problems found, but you need to manufacture a part, which will connect aperture ring with aperture adjustment hardware. But does not worth trying, nothing special for these lens.
Vivitar for C-FD (Tokina made):
Needs a lot of machine work, and also has a specific issue - due to silly design of C-FD mount, it is not simply possible to change the mount, you have to re-calculate reduction ratio of a mechanism that connects aperture to dial, since original one has kind of reduction ratio, so movement of dial by say 10mm, translates into 5mm movement of aperture lock.
Vivitar for OM (Kobori made):
Same as PK Vivitars by Kobori.
Forgot to mention, I have acces to CNC and lathe, so none of above modernisations done by me, can be done without that hardware. _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
This one is probably not a problem for you then. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
As said, C/FD mount is very tricky _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Tried today.
As hard as Hexanon adaptation _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Thats unfortunate. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Did some indoor tests today. Since have no control over aperture currently, all shots @ F5. I had to hand held the lens vs camera, so results does not worth uploading, but in general, look promising. Will do some outdoor tests tomorrow.
If anyone would like to re-work this lens, you should note that there is two ways of achieving the desired result:
1. Shorten rear tube (it allows so) and all corresponding prongs, pins etc. And use some C/FD adapter to your mount.
2. Completely remove the aperture control mechanisms, excluding the ring dial, and incorporate new (slimmer) one, which will allow adapter to fit in a way, allowing infinity focus (the way I'm doing it). _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Pictures of the mount+conversion would be interesting. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
I'm in desperate need for damaged Minolta AF lenses, but with intact mount _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Use an M42-Sony Alpha adapter. These are very cheap. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Yes I'm using but they are very thin and have no holes pre-drilled to mount on lens body making holes im them makes them even weaker, and using thick ones means infinity focus go away. _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Same with the PK adapters.
I am just careful in making the holes and especially the countersink. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Did some shots today. Nothing to write home about, especially at 300mm.
Here are two crops from top left corner @F5, 85 and 300mm.
_________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Corners arent that big a deal with long tele.
The important part is center sharpness and CA, etc. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Centers also won't get anyone excited
85mm:
300mm:
_________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
No, thats pretty poor. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
In absolute terms, quality not that bad (compared to other el cheapo lens).
Here's Tokina 60-300/4-5.6 Minolta AF @ 300/5.6:
But ye olde Tair-3, 300@4.5 shows who is who:
_________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|