Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Lens with most aperture blades?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SCHNEIDER-KREUZNACH SYMMAR 12/370mm LF lens: 19 blades.


PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a few more:

Focusing:
Asahi Pentax Tele-Takumar (M42) 200/5.6: 10 blades
Enna Tele-Ennalyt (M42) 240/4.5: 10 blades
Meyer Helioplan (Exakta) 40/4.5: 12 blades

Non-focusing:
Steinheil Culminar VL (M42-EN) 105/4.5: 16 blades
(actually a bellows-macro lens, but I'll call it ENlarging)


PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shoot wide open and you'll never need to care about blade count.


PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I omitted these previously as I thought 10 blades isn't “enough”, but since there are others with that number on the list:

Pentacon 30mm f/3.5 (probably Meyer Lydith too) – 10 blades
MIR-1V 37mm f/2.8 – 10 blades
Steinheil-München Quinar 135mm f/2.8 – 10 blades
Sony or Minolta STF 135mm f/2.8 t/4.5 – 10 blades


PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ramiller500 wrote:
Shoot wide open and you'll never need to care about blade count.


99% i do. Nevertheless circular apertures are still very cool.

Arkku wrote:
I omitted these previously as I thought 10 blades isn't “enough”


Big list is fine but to make it to the Hall of fame i guess 15 is minimum.


PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think listing the 'shorties' with only 10-14 blades is interesting as showing trends in makers, mounts, and FL's towards more or fewer blades.

Also of interest would be a list of variants. My most prominent entry there would be a CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 -- my big black M42 version (#10791837) has only 5 blades, while my little aluminum Exakta version (#3637326) has 12 blades. That is why I included mount information in all that I've listed, because lens versions can vary so much.

We often assume that more blades --> better boken. Yet at the other end of the blade-count spectrum, my Schneider Betavaron 50-125 enlarger zoom has only 5 blades that form a distinctly stellar aperture as they close down, yet give an ultra-creamy bokeh. Perhaps the lens' 800g of glass has something to do with that, eh?


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:21 am    Post subject: muiti blade lenses Reply with quote

My Peerotar 135mm f2.8 Has 20 blades and my Tele Vivitar 200mm f3.5 preset has 18 blades


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Kryss,

Do you have a picture of that Peerotar ?

From what I now know of that brand the lens could be a Komura, Fujita or Kyoei.


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:58 am    Post subject: Re: Lens with most aperture blades? Reply with quote

no-X wrote:
updated:

Schneider Xenar 3.5/240: 30 blades
Noflexar 5.6/400mm: 24 blades
TAIR-11A 2.8/135mm: 20 blades
Komura Koki Tokyo 2.8/135mm: 20 blades
Meyer-Optik Görlitz Orestegor 4/300mm: 19 blades
CZJ Biotar T 5.8/2, 58/2 (manual): 17 blades
TAIR-3S 4.5/300mm: 16 blades
Steinheil München Culminar 135 & 85mm: 16 blades
Sankyo Kohki Komura 105mm f/2.5: 16 blades
Isco-Göttingen Tele-Westanar 135mm f/3.5: 15 blades
Ernst Leitz Wetzlar Summarit: 1.5/5cm: 15 blades
Ernst Leitz Wetzlar Hektor 13,5/4,5: 15 blades
Vivitar 85/1.8 (T-mount): 15 blades
Jupiter-9: 15 blades
Meyer Trioplan V 100/2.8: 15 blades
Meyer Orestor (preset Pentacon) 135/2.8: 15 blades
Meyer Telemegor V 180/5.5: 15 blades
Meyer Orestegor 200/4: 15 blades
Meyer Primoplan V 75/1.9: 15 blades
Meyer Primoplan V 58/1.9 (manual, pre-set): 14 blades
CZJ Flektogon T 35/2.8 (pre-set): 14 blades
KMZ Helios 44 58/2 (old KMZ version): 13 blades
ZOMZ Jupiter-3 Π 50/1,5: 13 blades
Meyer Telefogar V 90/3.5: 12 blades
Meyer Trioplan 50/2.8: 12 blades
CZJ Biotar T 58/2 (early pre-set model): 12 blades
CZJ Biometar 80/2.8 (pre-set): 12 blades
CZJ Tessar T 40/4.5 (manual): 10 blades
CZJ Biotar T 75/1.5 (pre-set): 10 blades (round at f/1.8 and f/16)
Meyer Helioplan V 40/4.5 (pre-set): 10 blades
Meyer Primagon V 35/4.5 (pre-set): 10 blades
Asahi Auto Takumar 35/2.3: 10 blades


Seeing lists like these remind me of just how insignificant my lens collection truly is! Laughing


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems to me it was primarily the German companies (and out of those, primarily Meyer) who had an obsession with mucho blades...

However, the best bokeh lenses I have have 6 blades - Helios 44, Petri 1.8/55, and the Pentacons I have (1.8/50 and 2.8/2Cool with more blades have lessser bokeh...

So what is more important for bokeh - optical formula or number of blades?

I'm thinking it's optical formula because the Helios and Petri are both 6 element double gauss designs...


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:21 am    Post subject: Peerotar 135mm f2.8 20 blade Reply with quote

Herewith pics of Peeerotar, I also have a Wollensak 182mm f4.5 enlarging lens with 18blades, focus to infinity with bellows and great for macro.http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20114/1892_DSCF1205_1.jpg
http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20114/1892_DSCF1208_1.jpg


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:22 am    Post subject: Re pics Reply with quote

OOPS not got hang of posting pics yet.


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Kryss,

I think its been established by the Soligor identification crew that that lens is actually a Komura. I have one of each in the Peerotar and Soligor brands.

I'm trying to figure out what else was sold as a Peerotar. There may be another early Japanese maker they sold.


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scheimpflug wrote:
All this mechanical fuss just to make a round hole??

Blades are overrated. Waterhouse stops for the win! Mr. Green


Agree. Beyond 10 curved blades, it makes little importance how many there are.


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kryss, I thought you might want to see the Juplen version of your lens, also Komura made.
Sorry for the bad pic. I hope to have a fully functioning DSLR soon.


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are Komura lenses well regarded?


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
However, the best bokeh lenses I have have 6 blades - Helios 44, Petri 1.8/55, and the Pentacons I have (1.8/50 and 2.8/2Cool with more blades have lessser bokeh...

So what is more important for bokeh - optical formula or number of blades?

I'm thinking it's optical formula because the Helios and Petri are both 6 element double gauss designs...


The optical design is a bigger factor, but lenses with only 6 blades can get (imo) ugly hexagons when there are highlights in the background (or foreground) blur and lines in the bokeh.

Lenses with only 6 blades also give boring diffraction stars with only 6 spikes. I like the stars you get with 9 blades (18 spikes): http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/999661/0#9495246

For macro lenses I would prefer to have a high number of blades like 20 or so. Lenses with 9 blades still often show things like this:
http://1x.com/photo/35951/portfolio/50215
http://1x.com/photo/39005/portfolio/27566

Not everyone minds the "geometric" bokeh, but I would like it better if the highlights in the background were as close as possible to circular.


Last edited by AhamB on Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:09 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thankyou Aham, that is a very good explanation.


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is another one:


A.Schacht Ulm Travenon 4.5/135

17 or 18 (I need to count again Wink)


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some Komuras, the series of large aperture 80-135mm with Ernostar formulas, have a cult following and fetch high prices.

Most other Komuras have usually been ignored, perhaps because Komura was always lousy at marketing.

Some people, I am one of them, think the "lesser" Komuras are often extremely fine lenses also.

http://forum.mflenses.com/komura-135-2-8-preset-unidapter-m42-just-lovely-t16267,highlight,%2Bkomura.html

This has a 12-pointed "star" aperture btw.

http://forum.mflenses.com/super-komura-90-250-4-5-uni-auto-m42-mount-t15360,highlight,%2Bkomura.html

I have a mixed opinion of this particular lens (yours and mine, in the Peerotar/Soligor brands), which I believe is a very early Komura which first came out maybe in 1954 based on catalogs of the time. I need to try it again.


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's my early Viv 200mm f3.5 Preset. 18 blade. I think.







PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carl Zeiss Jena, Tessar 4.5/135


have no lens in front of me, but on Monday.

I think about 20 blades


PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In mint condition..Meyer Gorlitz Telemegor 250mm f5.5 18blade.


PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jeff Zen wrote:
Here's my early Viv 200mm f3.5 Preset. 18 blade. I think.







Splendid addition to my mysterious lens collection identifiable by unique blades turned upward:
http://forum.mflenses.com/mistery-lenses-collection-t23606.html


PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another that may not have been mentioned is the 200 mm Spiratone with 15 blades, forms almost a perfect circle. It looks vaguely like that Vivitar mentioned above but with five fewer blades.