 Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2023 11:06 am Post subject: |
 |
|
kathala wrote:
By chance, I found two raw images in my archive.
The seascape is the 85/1.2 nFD on LT2
The landscape is the 35/1.4 Sigma Art on Metabones. In this case, although the MB covers slightly more, it's the lens that vignettes - which is to be expected with wide angles. Nonetheless, it gives a 28/1, which is quite nice. (Both lenses wide open, without hood etc. of course, and soft vignette removed in post)
#1
#2
Pancolart, quite a few of these old russians were either made for MF initially, or cover more territory than they should (must be a russian thing...)
In the case of the Jupiter-8, I actually confirmed the data several times since I found it hard to believe as well. But though 62 mm image diameter is larger than FF, it will not cover MF - even 645 is 7o mm in diameter, 6x6 is 8o.[/img]
_________________
Photography Reference Tables:
drive.google.com/drive/folders/1aJ5F8XM6t5AK4bydthcDoiwhsh5CUx3N
My Art and Books: ChristianSchnalzger.de
My Exploration of Panoramic Photographic Storytelling:
flickr.com/photos/hach_und_ueberhaupt/
The better you look, the more you see (B. E. Ellis) |
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
